One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
American Civil War...
Sep 10, 2017 21:40:38   #
Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
 
American Civil War

UNITED STATES HISTORY

By Jennifer L. Weber, Warren W. Hassler

LAST UPDATED: 7-21-2017

American Civil War, also called War Between the States, four-year war (1861–65) between the United States and 11 Southern states that seceded from the Union and formed the Confederate States of America
.
Prelude To War

The secession of the Southern states (in chronological order, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina) in 1860–61 and the ensuing outbreak of armed hostilities were the culmination of decades of growing sectional friction over slavery. Between 1815 and 1861 the economy of the Northern states was rapidly modernizing and diversifying. Although agriculture—mostly smaller farms that relied on free labour—remained the dominant sector in the North, industrialization had taken root there. Moreover, Northerners had invested heavily in an expansive and varied transportation system that included canals, roads, steamboats, and railroads; in financial industries such as banking and insurance; and in a large communications network that featured inexpensive, widely available newspapers, magazines, and books, along with the telegraph.

By contrast, the Southern economy was based principally on large farms (plantations) that produced commercial crops such as cotton and that relied on slaves as the main labour force. Rather than invest in factories or railroads as Northerners had done, Southerners invested their money in slaves—even more than in land; by 1860, 84 percent of the capital invested in manufacturing was invested in the free (non-slave holding) states. Yet, to Southerners, as late as 1860, this appeared to be a sound business decision. The price of cotton, the South’s defining crop, had skyrocketed in the 1850s, and the value of slaves—who were, after all, property—rose commensurately. By 1860 the per capita wealth of Southern whites was twice that of Northerners, and three-fifths of the wealthiest individuals in the country were Southerners.


“The Undecided Political Prize Fight,” a lithograph depicting the presidential campaign of 1860 and featuring Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas.The extension of slavery into new territories and states had been an issue as far back as the Northwest Ordinance of 1784. When the slave territory of Missouri sought statehood in 1818, Congress debated for two years before arriving upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This was the first of a series of political deals that resulted from arguments between pro-slavery and antislavery forces over the expansion of the “peculiar institution,” as it was known, into the West. The end of the Mexican-American War in 1848 and the roughly 500,000 square miles (1.3 million square km) of new territory that the United States gained as a result of it added a new sense of urgency to the dispute. More and more Northerners, driven by a sense of morality or an interest in protecting free labour, came to believe, in the 1850s, that bondage needed to be eradicated. White Southerners feared that limiting the expansion of slavery would consign the institution to certain death. Over the course of the decade, the two sides became increasingly polarized and politicians less able to contain the dispute through compromise. When Abraham Lincoln, the candidate of the explicitly antislavery Republican Party, won the 1860 presidential election, seven Southern states (South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas) carried out their threat and seceded, organizing as the Confederate States of America.

“The Undecided Political Prize Fight,” a lithograph depicting the presidential campaign …

Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. (LC-USZ62-7877)In the early morning hours of April 12, 1861, rebels opened fire on Fort Sumter, at the entrance to the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina. Curiously, this first encounter of what would be the bloodiest war in the history of the United States claimed no victims. After a 34-hour bombardment, Maj. Robert Anderson surrendered his command of about 85 soldiers to some 5,500 besieging Confederate troops under P.G.T. Beauregard. Within weeks, four more Southern states (Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina) left the Union to join the Confederacy.

The Military Background Of The War

Comparison of North and South

At first glance it seemed that the 23 states that remained in the Union after secession were more than a match for the 11 Southern states. Approximately 21 million people lived in the North, compared with some nine million in the South of whom about four million were slaves. In addition, the North was the site of more than 100,000 manufacturing plants, against 18,000 south of the Potomac River, and more than 70 percent of the railroads were in the Union. Furthermore, the Federals had at their command a 30-to-1 superiority in arms production, a 2-to-1 edge in available manpower, and a great preponderance of commercial and financial resources. The Union also had a functioning government and a small but efficient regular army and navy.

The Confederate States of America consisted of 11 states—seven original members and four states that seceded after the fall of Fort Sumter. Four border states held slaves but remained in the Union. West Virginia became the 24th loyal state in 1863.
The Confederate States of America consisted of 11 states—seven original members and four …

Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.

The Confederacy was not predestined to defeat, however. The Southern armies had the advantage of fighting on interior lines, and their military tradition had bulked large in the history of the United States before 1860. Moreover, the long Confederate coastline of 3,500 miles (5,600 km) seemed to defy blockade, and the Confederate president, Jefferson Davis, hoped to receive decisive foreign aid and intervention. Confederate soldiers were fighting to achieve a separate and independent country based on what they called “Southern institutions,” the chief of which was the institution of slavery. So the Southern cause was not a lost one; indeed, other countries—most notably the United States itself in the American Revolution against Britain—had won independence against equally heavy odds.

http://www.britannica.com/event/American-Civil-War

Reply
Sep 11, 2017 06:24:01   #
Tug484
 
Texas never turned the Republic of Texas over to the jurisdiction of the federal government after it was over.

Reply
Sep 11, 2017 07:10:37   #
okie don
 
Tug484 wrote:
Texas never turned the Republic of Texas over to the jurisdiction of the federal government after it was over.


Tug, I'd heard this too.
Their Constitution is such that they can secede from the Union.

Reply
Sep 11, 2017 18:08:20   #
Tug484
 
Yes. Our legislature was talking about severing a couple of years ago.

Reply
Sep 13, 2017 01:42:21   #
acknowledgeurma
 
okie don wrote:
Tug, I'd heard this too.
Their Constitution is such that they can secede from the Union.

I think the result of the war that followed the last attempt at secession from the United States of America, pretty much confirmed that states cannot secede from the Union, whatever might be in their state constitution.

Reply
Sep 13, 2017 04:49:42   #
okie don
 
acknowledgeurma wrote:
I think the result of the war that followed the last attempt at secession from the United States of America, pretty much confirmed that states cannot secede from the Union, whatever might be in their state constitution.


California keeps talking about it too.

TX is pretty self sufficient in that they have oil and cattle plus much manufacturing.{ I lived in San Antonio 10 yrs}

Reply
Sep 13, 2017 05:54:13   #
Tug484
 
okie don wrote:
California keeps talking about it too.

TX is pretty self sufficient in that they have oil and cattle plus much manufacturing.{ I lived in San Antonio 10 yrs}

In Texas we also have our own Navy.

Reply
Sep 14, 2017 13:50:49   #
acknowledgeurma
 
okie don wrote:
California keeps talking about it too.

TX is pretty self sufficient in that they have oil and cattle plus much manufacturing.{ I lived in San Antonio 10 yrs}

[Irony warning]
And easy access to cheap exploitable labor!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.