The Dutchman

Keyes: Obama Working with Terrorists to Introduce Martial Law

Alan Keyes, who recently warned that gay marriage is leading to the creation of a totalitarian government, is now arguing that President Obama is using the IRS scandal as a distraction from his plan to allow terrorist attacks to take place and impose martial law.

Speaking with Stan Solomon on Wednesday, Keyes maintained that Obama “could very well be working a strategy that collaborates with and comports with the strategy of the very people who are trying to kill us,” with the goal of bringing America down and “destroying our way of life.”

By collaborating with terrorists to allow these attacks, Keyes continued, Obama will be able to consolidate “the tools and instruments that would be needed to fasten the structure of martial law and totalitarian tyranny on this country by force.”

He concluded that the “implementation of a terrorist strategy [is] aimed at producing the very kind of disorder, confusion, fear and anger that would then provide an excuse for that fastening on the country of martial law.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oDbHTyJk2I&feature=player_embedded

Alan Lee Keyes (born August 7, 1950) is an American conservative political activist, author, former diplomat, and perennial candidate for public office. A doctoral graduate of Harvard University,

FEDUP

Obama himself has said that he wants a third term. The only chance he has of that is by Martial Law.

CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas

Under the subject: "First President to:" you will find that Obama has given $200 million dollars to Hamas, a terrorist organization.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I didn't read all of those "First President to" things but did they include the money Obama has given to the Muslim Brotherhood through the Egyptian government? I guess I better go and look there since the total amount counting planes and tanks is much more than the $200 million.

carmel

How do nuts like this even get press time?? Never in my lifetime have I read/heard such outrageous, mind numbing crap about the President of the United States.

CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas

Quid Pro Quo, carmel: This topic contains two issues that you refer to. First there is Alan Keyes terrorist comment. Keyes is nationally known, respected, and ran for president as I recall. The second dealt with Obama sending $200 million tax payer dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, as nationally reported, and as reported by the Brits, thus:
• First President to send $200 million to a terrorist organization (Hamas) after Congress had explicitly frozen the money for fear it would fund attacks against civilians (Sources: American Thinker, The Independent [UK]).
You call these issues "[o]utrageous, mind numbing crap about the President of the United States." Well lets see. Either Muslim Obama sent the $200 million tax payer dollars or he didn't. Pray tell us, what evidence do you have that he didn't? The Congress had explicitly frozen the money or it did not. Be so kind as to tell us what evidence you have that the Congress did not do that! Why is it do you suspect that you brain dead liberal lemming drones can only stamp your feet, childishly throw a temper tantrum, assert other folks are "nuts", and call their comments "mind numbing crap" when it is applied to your hero Muslim Obama. Why can't you defend Muslim Obama with even alleged facts? No, your only ability to respond to true facts you don't want to hear, is to run your mouth with a vitriolic ad hominem personal attack. But that is why you are a brain dead liberal lemming drone, as you have just so kindly exhibited. Opinion here: add some substance to your comments, or get gone.

carmel

Once again the right has the information wrong. First of all the article is about Obama working with terrorists to introduce martial law. This is mind numbing crap. Secondly, and get your facts straight, the United States sent $450 million to Egypt to shore up the country financially. Egypt had democratic elections and just because they elected people you don't like does not mean we should withdraw from the scene which would be a strategic misstep that pushes Egypt further into the arms of the well-funded and religiously-inspired Saudis and Qataris who have sent $3 billion in aid. It also equates the actions of a few extremists with an entire population that for decades has been a friend of the United States and an important ally in the Middle East.

CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas

Quid Pro Quo, carmel: Why is it do you suspect Obama met with the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood in the White House Oval office a few months ago. I don't know of the $450 million you advised the "United States" sent to Egypt, I only saw the $200 million is said to have sent in violation of the Congressional hold as reported here and in England by the cited authorities. If they are incorrect, it is they that are wrong not me. I only advised of what was reported and cited. Nor do I know if it is even the same moneys involved. The fact that you would couch your statement of the asserted democratic election in Egypt as electing people I don't like, without identifying the Muslim Brotherhood as being elected and now in control of the government of Egypt, says more about your liberal bias than it does even about the fact of the statement. Your statement: "It also equates the actions of a few extremists with an entire population ..." describing the Muslim Brotherhood now in control of the government of Egypt, as "a few extremists" further adequately demonstrates your liberal bent willingness to bias issues.

carmel

You want me to use the term Muslim Brotherhood that's fine with me. I don't see anywhere where you complain about this President or any other President meeting with leaders of Saudia Arabia - the land of Sharia law and the breeding ground for 18 terrorists that drove planes into the World Trade Center and killed thousands of America. Why is that? Could it be oil?

CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas

Quid Pro Quo, carmel: You are letting your insidious imagination carry you away. I don't recall any presidents meeting with the King of Saudia Arabia, except that is when Obama went over to Saudi Arabia and bowed down to the King of Saudi Arabia, as do all good Muslims. Just another fact indicating Obama is a Muslim. Nor am I in support of Saudia Arabia or Saudia terrorists, or any other terrorists, that killed Americans. And hey sure shot, you missed by a mile with your insidious imagination as to your profound suspect that the reason for your strawman you impose upon me, is that it must be about oil. The in fact truth is I don't give a good G-- D--- about Saudi Arabia or Saudi Arabia's oil. I don't believe we should buy any Middle East oil or other foreign oil. We don't need it. We can be energy independent if Muslim Obama would allow the pipe line and allow for exploration and production on government land. It's the libs that support the Muslims, even when they kill Americans, including Obama who precluded the rescue of our Ambassador with order to stand down that resulted in the death of 4 Americans including the Ambassador and two Navy Seals that died saving American lives. So don't try to paint me with support of Saudi Arabia or Muslims killing Americans. With your response, I am now convienced beyond doubt that there is no homologous compatibility between us and I should not waste my time trying to discuss issues with you.

carmel

Your facts are absolutely incorrect. Both Bush's met with the King of Saudia Arabia MANY times and in fact are personal friends of the King. You are truly a sad, sad misinformed person. I feel sorry for your limited world view and your inability to see the truth. I will no longer post as hate filled people like you make me sad to think you can call yourself an American. Take your lies and conspiracy theories someplace else.

CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas

Quid Pro Quo, carmel: I did't say no other president met with the King of Saudia Arabia, I said I didn't "RECALL" if they did. You can't make that into your statement that "You facts are absolutely incorrect." But then you are a liberal dim who can only argue against your own factually incorrect strament. I think what really made me recally any meeting with the King of Saudia Arabia was an American President for the first time in history bowing down to the Saudi King, as your hero Obama sure as h--- did. We didn't bow to King George and American presidents don't bow to Kings, except that is Obama, probably because he is a Muslim beyond reasonable doubt. [That should just make you livid.] As for your ad hominem personal attack: is that the best you can do? It's horse dour'vers. You must be one of those spoilt rich liberal lemming drones hidding out in Jackson Hole Wyoming. I go there to catch your trout once in awhile, and there are a few of you running around spoiling Jackson Hole the best you can. I'll give you the last shot, maybe, depending upon what you say.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Do you have a picture of either Bush bowing deeply to the Saudi king? I have one here of Obama doing just that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WlqW6UCeaY

shoemama

There is another way for Obama to get a third term. In fact, the groundwork is already being laid. A Congressman has already written a bill to overturn the Two-Term Limit law. Both the Senate and the House have to pass it ,however. They intend to make sure that the Democrats take over the leadership in the House and keep the Senate in 2014. As we saw last year, they are willing to do just about anything so that the vote goes their way.
If that doesn't work, then they can always turn to Marshall Law. The new FEMA camps, huge orders of ammunition, and the attempt to negate the Second Ammendment by confiscating guns, would, of course, help in that endeavor.
I would think that Obama would prefer to take over as quietly as possible. He knows that most people wouldn't even notice until his Dictatorship was already accomplished. He is arrogant enough to think that most wouldn't mind!

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Your first suggestion just won't work. It is saying that the Congress can abolish an Amendment and that just isn't so. The 22nd Amendment says that nobody can serve more than two terms as President. In order to change that the Amendment has to be amended and if all the members of both houses of Congress were progressives that wouldn't do it. Only when states, legislatures in all but one, approve an amendment does it become law. It takes either 3/4 of State legislatures or the same number of conventions to amend the Constitution.

I would say that martial law is about the only way Obama can serve more than two terms and am not sure he can press his dictatorship any other day.