One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
people of faith verses atheists
Page <<first <prev 5 of 89 next> last>>
Feb 29, 2016 20:26:13   #
Kevyn
 
Artemis wrote:
Is this not prayer,If we were to label prayer something different...say our inner conscious thought, a transcending conscious energy?

Is "prayer" more acceptable to the literal scientific world?

At the same time if people who pray could validate prayer as also a conscious energy, could they accept the validation that science/nature is part of God, part of the holy trinity.

Can this be a bridge for the believers and the atheists
Nothing should be more sacred than facts. Where we have reason we don't need faith, where we have no reason we have lost both our connection to this world and to one another. People who harbor strong convictions without evidence belong at the margins of our society not in the halls of power. We should respect the person's desire for a better life in this world, not his certainly that a better one waits for him in the next.

Reply
Feb 29, 2016 20:40:45   #
Artemis
 
Glaucon wrote:
You are offering a false dichotomy: you seem to have divided humans into those who believe any belief system and believe it mindlessly and without any doubt and humans have invented thousands of these beliefs system to believe in mindlessly. Two of these systems are Christianity and Islam, and there countless sub groups of these. On the other side of your dichotomy you have atheism and I guess that would include those who mindlessly believe they know for sure there is no power or force that made everything happen.

I think a more evolved belief system is agnosticism which means I don't know and you don't know the mystery of it all will remain a mystery and humans should feel secure enough to be able to not fool themselves into thinking they know that which, at least at the present time, is unknowable.

Believers and nonbelievers tend to have very strong negative feelings toward those who disagree with them because it is serious threat to their fragile and fanciful belief systems on which they base their security.
You are offering a false dichotomy: you seem to ha... (show quote)




~Thank you Glaucon for you thoughtful feedback, but I feel a dichotomy is exactly what it is, yet my question...does it have to be?

Someone praying to "someone" verses someone meditating may have slight differences, though I don't find either to be mindless, but where we find commonalities is where we can bridge the gap and come closer together rather than intently opposing. In both cases people are reaching beyond our physical three dimensional world, Looking for answers and /or guidance.

One praying to an envisioned single entity, while the other may be reaching for an only an inner consciousness but unknowing may also be reaching out into the unknown and become in touch with a divine source.

Either way people are constantly searching for a connection, some feel or believe in the law of god, some believe in the laws of nature, are they not one in the same?

Possibly if people understood this connection of everything they would not be afraid and stop attacking each other over differences.

Reply
Feb 29, 2016 21:15:22   #
Glaucon
 
Artemis wrote:
~Thank you Glaucon for you thoughtful feedback, but I feel a dichotomy is exactly what it is, yet my question...does it have to be?

Someone praying to "someone" verses someone meditating may have slight differences, though I don't find either to be mindless, but where we find commonalities is where we can bridge the gap and come closer together rather than intently opposing. In both cases people are reaching beyond our physical three dimensional world, Looking for answers and /or guidance.

One praying to an envisioned single entity, while the other may be reaching for an only an inner consciousness but unknowing may also be reaching out into the unknown and become in touch with a divine source.

Either way people are constantly searching for a connection, some feel or believe in the law of god, some believe in the laws of nature, are they not one in the same?

Possibly if people understood this connection of everything they would not be afraid and stop attacking each other over differences.
~Thank you Glaucon for you thoughtful feedback, bu... (show quote)


I meditate regularly and I get a lot from it. It makes me feel good and relaxed and I enjoy it, However, I don't have any fantasies attached to it that I am aware. However, I think It allows me to tap into my unconscious mind and use it.

Reply
 
 
Feb 29, 2016 21:27:26   #
Artemis
 
Kevyn wrote:
Nothing should be more sacred than facts. Where we have reason we don't need faith, where we have no reason we have lost both our connection to this world and to one another. People who harbor strong convictions without evidence belong at the margins of our society not in the halls of power. We should respect the person's desire for a better life in this world, not his certainly that a better one waits for him in the next.



~I could never consider a fact to be sacred, it is simply a fact. Sometimes facts in science can change as new undiscovered information comes forward. Science is always evolving. At one time it was thought all things were matter, now it's revealed all matter breaks down to energy.

It is not the constrictions of religious judgements of the extremists who are against all if not of their deity I am speaking of. It is the state of sharing features or attributes in simple thought or prayer we have in common.

As far as reason it may get you through the day, but faith may get you through the night.

Reason is logic and our ability to understand which is not to be under rated. If one considers reason gives us the ability to have empathy, then yes reason is crucial to our connections to all, yet there are many explainable and illogical occurrences that exist every day. It is humbling how much we don't know and will learn.

I agree Kevyn we need to respect ones right to happiness, and to value the here and now,yet we also have to respect the person who finds comfort in believing he leaves this world to a better place, that is his right also. Thank you for your thoughtful post.

Reply
Feb 29, 2016 21:42:56   #
Artemis
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Actually, that is sort of a good point, if indeed there would be a hell created by a creator. That is one thing I doubt very seriously, that a being with the ability to create life would create a place where some of his creation would suffer eternally.


I'm with you nwtk :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 29, 2016 21:46:50   #
Artemis
 
Searching wrote:
Fear is a powerful emotion. Indeed it is, makes reasonable thoughts take flight for lands unknown when "maybe" sitting tight might be a more sane choice. I don't see Artemis as calling for compromise, but for a way to see those who feel differently in a different light. Yes, compromise seems to be an ugly word these days. You might be quite right about those nonbelievers who fear also hate. However, leaving an opening, a place to perch, if just for a place to safely exchange/acknowledge the differences....can it hurt?
Fear is a powerful emotion. Indeed it is, makes r... (show quote)


Thank you Searching, that's all I'm going for, an exchange of thoughts. I do find it disheartening when some won't even consider a bridge of understanding.

Reply
Feb 29, 2016 22:24:40   #
Artemis
 
Glaucon wrote:
I meditate regularly and I get a lot from it. It makes me feel good and relaxed and I enjoy it, However, I don't have any fantasies attached to it that I am aware. However, I think It allows me to tap into my unconscious mind and use it.


Well if you're not aware of the fantasies you must be doing it wrong :wink: :lol: :lol: sorry couldn't resist, things tend to be dry around here.

Yes I do also, and believe it taps into the preconscious, I also believe that thought is energy.
some interesting tidbits;

John Locke, a 17th-century philosopher, was one of the first to speak and write on consciousness. He believed that our identity was tied to our consciousness, which he essentially defined as what passes through a man’s mind, or memories. He also asserted that our consciousness is not tied to our physical bodies, and that it can survive even after our physical bodies die. In fact, Locke held that consciousness could be transferred from one soul to another.

René Descartes also addressed the idea of consciousness in the 17th century. He set out to answer the question of how it is possible that our consciousness, a non-physical thing, can come from our bodies, a physical thing.

The explanation he came up with was called Cartesian dualism, in short, consciousness resides within an immaterial domain he called res cogitans (the realm of thought), in contrast to the domain of material things, which he called res extensa (the realm of extension). He suggested that the interaction between these two domains occurs inside the brain.

My point being which ever we are doing...we are connecting, to what exactly, is not known yet.

Reply
 
 
Feb 29, 2016 22:29:18   #
Glaucon
 
Artemis wrote:
Well if you're not aware of the fantasies you must be doing it wrong :wink: :lol: :lol: sorry couldn't resist, things tend to be dry around here.

Yes I do also, and believe it taps into the preconscious, I also believe that thought is energy.
some interesting tidbits;

John Locke, a 17th-century philosopher, was one of the first to speak and write on consciousness. He believed that our identity was tied to our consciousness, which he essentially defined as what passes through a man’s mind, or memories. He also asserted that our consciousness is not tied to our physical bodies, and that it can survive even after our physical bodies die. In fact, Locke held that consciousness could be transferred from one soul to another.

René Descartes also addressed the idea of consciousness in the 17th century. He set out to answer the question of how it is possible that our consciousness, a non-physical thing, can come from our bodies, a physical thing.

The explanation he came up with was called Cartesian dualism, in short, consciousness resides within an immaterial domain he called res cogitans (the realm of thought), in contrast to the domain of material things, which he called res extensa (the realm of extension). He suggested that the interaction between these two domains occurs inside the brain.

My point being which ever we are doing...we are connecting, to what exactly, is not known yet.
Well if you're not aware of the fantasies you must... (show quote)
That part of us that is not known to us is most of what we are. Great research on that in recent books, Thinking Fast and Slow and Strangers to Ourselves. Most on here are obviously are not readers, but if your are, you will appreciaate these books.

Reply
Mar 1, 2016 06:19:57   #
rebob14
 
Artemis wrote:
Is this not prayer,If we were to label prayer something different...say our inner conscious thought, a transcending conscious energy?

Is "prayer" more acceptable to the literal scientific world?

At the same time if people who pray could validate prayer as also a conscious energy, could they accept the validation that science/nature is part of God, part of the holy trinity.

Can this be a bridge for the believers and the atheists


The power of intention

Reply
Mar 1, 2016 06:50:00   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
It's a theological construct. You appear to believe in it. So, I'd say you ARE religious. Remember, you said burn in hell. Only a few religions have that view of it.

Did I ever say I am NOT religious? No,I don't think so. I said I am not Christian. You surely know that not all religious people are Christian, don't you?

Reply
Mar 1, 2016 07:26:55   #
Kevyn
 
Tasine wrote:
Did I ever say I am NOT religious? No,I don't think so. I said I am not Christian. You surely know that not all religious people are Christian, don't you?

Even Devil worshipers are welcome in our nation of all faiths.

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2016 07:29:47   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Kevyn wrote:
Even Devil worshipers are welcome in our nation of all faiths.

Worse than that - our "President" welcomes Muslim terrorists in our nation. It can't get worse than that.

Reply
Mar 1, 2016 08:06:57   #
Artemis
 
Glaucon wrote:
That part of us that is not known to us is most of what we are. Great research on that in recent books, Thinking Fast and Slow and Strangers to Ourselves. Most on here are obviously are not readers, but if your are, you will appreciaate these books.


Thank you, I do love to read and will check those out.

Reply
Mar 1, 2016 08:11:16   #
Artemis
 
rebob14 wrote:
The power of intention



That's what it's all about my friend :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 1, 2016 08:31:40   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
I was watching a news clip about a group protesting religion and there was a man in the back ground with a sign saying let Jesus come back and we'll kill him again. If they don't believe why are they so angery at something they don't believe is real?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 89 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.