One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Planned Parenthood found innocent
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Jan 28, 2016 01:10:55   #
fiatlux
 
no propaganda please wrote:
No charges were presented to Planned Parenthood so they never went to trial. No trial, no declaration of guilty or innocent. so stop claiming they were found innocent that is a misrepresentation.


ELEVEN STATES, seven of them REPUBLICAN controlled, found Planned Parenthood innocent of all charges regarding selling fetal tissue. THEY DID NOT SELL FETAL TISSUE DESPITE THE EXORBITANT AMOUNT OFFERED BY THE CHRISTIAN HOAXERS, of which they stand accused.

Reply
Jan 28, 2016 02:24:37   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
fiatlux wrote:
ELEVEN STATES, seven of them REPUBLICAN controlled, found Planned Parenthood innocent of all charges regarding selling fetal tissue. THEY DID NOT SELL FETAL TISSUE DESPITE THE EXORBITANT AMOUNT OFFERED BY THE CHRISTIAN HOAXERS, of which they stand accused.


Says who?

Reply
Jan 28, 2016 06:52:03   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
fiatlux wrote:
Did you read the part where the tapes were altered and eleven states that investigated, seven of them Republican controlled, found PP innocent of any wrong-doing.


You mean in your dream? No, I didn't

You're seriously saying these people didn't say what they said? It was all computer generated baby sellers?

Spielberg couldn't have pulled that off.

Reply
Jan 28, 2016 12:14:21   #
Gener
 
Glaucon wrote:
We have procedures to, among other things, decide who should be charged with crimes and who should not. That is called due process and it is a basic right under our constitution. Bogus charges were made against Planned Parenthood, the issue was taken to a grand jury. The grand jury found the charges against Planned Parents to be without merit and in the process the grand jury found the criminals who doctored the evidence to have committed crimes for which they are being charged. What is so difficult to understand about that?

I don't quite understand why you resorted to so many insults and silliness over something so obvious to anyone who is intelligent enough to breathe.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you keep talking nonsense and don't know what you are talking about. The grand jury found the charges without merit because it is corrupt, as is our government. If you don't want insults get in touch with reality and quite supporting a corrupt organization, and face the truth about the way things are. You keep posting nonsense. You never listen, so what choice is left but to get hard nosed with you. Start facing reality.

What is it that caused you to diagnose me as a "sick Man?"
We have procedures to, among other things, decide ... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 28, 2016 12:27:46   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
fiatlux wrote:
ELEVEN STATES, seven of them REPUBLICAN controlled, found Planned Parenthood innocent of all charges regarding selling fetal tissue. THEY DID NOT SELL FETAL TISSUE DESPITE THE EXORBITANT AMOUNT OFFERED BY THE CHRISTIAN HOAXERS, of which they stand accused.


OK If they were found innocent that means they went to trial and were found innocent. when was the trial, was it a bench trial or a jury trial. What the truth is that the charges were dropped, maybe for lack of evidence more likely because of the connections between the city government of Houston and PP. If the charges were dropped, which is what happened they were not determined to be either innocent or guilty, just the claim there was insufficient evidence. Lord help us if you or any of the others who do not understand the difference are on a jury, you will use your "feelings" about the people involved to make your decision, ignoring the facts totally.

Reply
Jan 30, 2016 18:30:47   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Glaucon wrote:
When those terrible liberals quit defending our constitution and diss due process, I will try to become a head case, AF also.


Where in the world are the liberals defending our constitution? They are trying to tear down the greatest document ever written because they say it is outdated.

Reply
Jan 30, 2016 18:34:36   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Glaucon wrote:
You are too quick to try to refute things that reveal you as a hard right head case.

The Supreme Court of the state of Texas tried a case and found Planned Parenthood to be not guilty of all charges that were charged. You are partially illinformed and partially misinformed. This kind of factoids is making you look increasingly foolish, closed minded and AF.


Please show me one article that says that the Texas supreme court found PP innocent of charges. It was a grand jury that found PP innocent which was pushed by a liberal prosecutor to a liberal grand jury. Huston iis ran by liberals and the LBGT.

Reply
Jan 30, 2016 19:08:48   #
Glaucon
 
Louie27 wrote:
Where in the world are the liberals defending our constitution? They are trying to tear down the greatest document ever written because they say it is outdated.


RESPONSE:

Our constitution is based on liberalism and I don’t know any liberals who do not defend our constitution and liberalism.

Liberals believe our constitution is not outdated because it includes provisions for keeping it up dated.

Reply
Jan 30, 2016 19:14:23   #
Glaucon
 
Louie27 wrote:
Please show me one article that says that the Texas supreme court found PP innocent of charges. It was a grand jury that found PP innocent which was pushed by a liberal prosecutor to a liberal grand jury. Huston iis ran by liberals and the LBGT.


RESPONSE:

Actually you were partially right: A grand jury found that there was no grounds for indicting Planned Parenthood and the issue didn't get to the Texas Supreme Court. I think the finding of no grounds for indictment means innocence.

Reply
Jan 30, 2016 19:17:30   #
Glaucon
 
no propaganda please wrote:
OK If they were found innocent that means they went to trial and were found innocent. when was the trial, was it a bench trial or a jury trial. What the truth is that the charges were dropped, maybe for lack of evidence more likely because of the connections between the city government of Houston and PP. If the charges were dropped, which is what happened they were not determined to be either innocent or guilty, just the claim there was insufficient evidence. Lord help us if you or any of the others who do not understand the difference are on a jury, you will use your "feelings" about the people involved to make your decision, ignoring the facts totally.
OK If they were found innocent that means they wen... (show quote)


I believe you are right about the Grand Jury findings that there was no evidence for convicting PP of anything.

Reply
Jan 30, 2016 19:41:38   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Glaucon wrote:
RESPONSE:

Our constitution is based on liberalism and I don’t know any liberals who do not defend our constitution and liberalism.

Liberals believe our constitution is not outdated because it includes provisions for keeping it up dated.


I do not think that a Republic is a liberal concept. That is why our fore fathers said this was a Republic. The provision you are talking about is a Constitutional Convention and not just a vote by the ruling party in Congress.

Reply
Check out topic: Susan Collins (Maine)
Jan 30, 2016 20:09:05   #
Glaucon
 
Louie27 wrote:
I do not think that a Republic is a liberal concept. That is why our fore fathers said this was a Republic. The provision you are talking about is a Constitutional Convention and not just a vote by the ruling party in Congress.
We have a liberal republic and I like it.

Reply
Feb 8, 2016 16:44:26   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Glaucon wrote:
We have a liberal Republic and I like it.


Emphatically, I deny your assumption this is a liberal Republic.

Reply
Feb 8, 2016 16:59:07   #
Glaucon
 
Louie27 wrote:
Emphatically, I deny your assumption this is a liberal Republic.



If you emphatically deny that America is a liberal democratic republic, it is definitely and absolutely a liberal democratic republic or it isn't.

Try not to get so twisted up in labels. It can make thinking impossible.

Reply
Feb 8, 2016 17:01:26   #
Glaucon
 
Louie27 wrote:
I do not think that a Republic is a liberal concept. That is why our fore fathers said this was a Republic. The provision you are talking about is a Constitutional Convention and not just a vote by the ruling party in Congress.


Republic is neither a liberal or a non liberal concept. It is how a government operates that makes it liberal or not and we can always change the label.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.