One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Look Closely at This Federal Spending Chart.
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Feb 6, 2016 13:18:45   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
3jack wrote:
Didn't think you would like it because it answers your request for proof of a statement.
You didn't think at all.

It was not a link to the chart, nor was it a link to a time in Obama's 2nd term.

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 13:28:36   #
3jack
 
Super Dave wrote:
You didn't think at all.

It was not a link to the chart, nor was it a link to a time in Obama's 2nd term.


You didn't ask for a link, you asked what republican advocated for less help for the downtrodden and needy. I know remembering what you posted becomes harder as you grow older, but you can go back and re-read your own post.

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 13:41:31   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
payne1000 wrote:
The link you provided does not show who compiles the information. Why should it have any more credibility than the chart posted? You don't post any sources to back up your claims about the solvency of Social security.


Like I said, you're priceless!!! And, damn ignorant!!!! How in the hell do you even get dressed in the morning, or do you need a lot of help???

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2016 13:43:10   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
3jack wrote:
I doesn't have shit to do with military spending, but it says a lot about the republican approach to assisting the needy and poor, so eff yourself and read the article. BTW, why are you responding to a post directed to another poster? Are you his fluffer?


Man, you're even more ignorant than payne1000!! Just when I didn't think there was another person that dumb, then you come along.

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 13:44:02   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
3jack wrote:
I doesn't have shit to do with military spending, but it says a lot about the republican approach to assisting the needy and poor, so eff yourself and read the article. BTW, why are you responding to a post directed to another poster? Are you his fluffer?


It explains his Social Security statement...idiot! Pay attention!

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 14:23:47   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
3jack wrote:
You didn't ask for a link, you asked what republican advocated for less help for the downtrodden and needy. I know remembering what you posted becomes harder as you grow older, but you can go back and re-read your own post.
I asked for the source of your false post.

I can understand why you'd refuse. After all, what good is a lie if you admit it?

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 14:28:23   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
3jack wrote:
I doesn't have shit to do with military spending, but it says a lot about the republican approach to assisting the needy and poor, so eff yourself and read the article. BTW, why are you responding to a post directed to another poster? Are you his fluffer?


Aww bend over and take it like a man....puffer sluff ball. You are a pink and swishy as they come....pathetic at best.

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2016 16:43:34   #
Elwood Loc: Florida
 
payne1000 wrote:
The dark blue slice is the one which should give everyone pause. . .


You have just shown everyone your stupidity. What a bunch of bullshit. Crawl back into your hole you liberturd dimwit. :hunf: :XD: :XD: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 16:45:11   #
Elwood Loc: Florida
 



Reply
Feb 6, 2016 16:47:07   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
payne1000 wrote:
The dark blue slice is the one which should give everyone pause. . .


Wait...I do not see anything at all....nothing even close to it...the part of the chart which shows the budget for YOU and of course, your Camel, Morris!?!

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 16:49:04   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
Elwood wrote:
You have just shown everyone your stupidity. What a bunch of bullshit. Crawl back into your hole you liberturd dimwit. :hunf: :XD: :XD: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:


I cannot even begin to understand how a Muslim (payne) comes on this website and posts the same GARBAGE each and every single time....he is like a broken record....

Perhaps I can "bake him a cake"...with LOTS of Rat Poison....hahahahahah!

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2016 16:50:54   #
Elwood Loc: Florida
 
America Only wrote:
I cannot even begin to understand how a Muslim (payne) comes on this website and posts the same GARBAGE each and every single time....he is like a broken record....

Perhaps I can "bake him a cake"...with LOTS of Rat Poison....hahahahahah!


:lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 7, 2016 08:02:36   #
payne1000
 
America Only wrote:
I cannot even begin to understand how a Muslim (payne) comes on this website and posts the same GARBAGE each and every single time....he is like a broken record....

Perhaps I can "bake him a cake"...with LOTS of Rat Poison....hahahahahah!


Ignorance and malice are self-refuting.

Reply
Feb 7, 2016 08:40:20   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Like most threads, this one has evolved into an insult trading contest.

US exorbitant defense spending is out of control!! The taxpayers deserve better.

A recent investigation has revealed that the Pentagon has failed to account for $8.5 trillion dollars of taxpayer money Congress has allocated toward the U.S. Department of Defense since 1996.

According to the report, out from Reuters, the Pentagon has routinely cooked its books by failing to supply a clear monthly account of the money spent for Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS).

Via Reuters:

Linda Woodford spent the last 15 years of her career inserting phony numbers in the U.S. Department of Defense’s accounts.

Every month until she retired in 2011, she says, the day came when the Navy would start dumping numbers on the Cleveland, Ohio, office of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, the Pentagon’s main accounting agency. Using the data they received, Woodford and her fellow DFAS accountants there set about preparing monthly reports to square the Navy’s books with the U.S. Treasury’s — a balancing-the-checkbook manoeuvre required of all the military services and other Pentagon agencies.

And every month, they encountered the same problem. Numbers were missing. Numbers were clearly wrong. Numbers came with no explanation of how the money had been spent or which congressional appropriation it came from. “A lot of times there were issues of numbers being inaccurate,” Woodford says. “We didn’t have the detail … for a lot of it.”

The data flooded in just two days before deadline. As the clock ticked down, Woodford says, staff were able to resolve a lot of the false entries through hurried calls and emails to Navy personnel, but many mystery numbers remained. For those, Woodford and her colleagues were told by superiors to take “unsubstantiated change actions” — in other words, enter false numbers, commonly called “plugs,” to make the Navy’s totals match the Treasury’s.

The news agency revealed that for the fiscal year 2012, it is “impossible to determine” how much of the $565 billion Congress budgeted for the Pentagon was used for its intended purpose.

The report also reveals numerous examples of unnecessary military spending as well as about a half trillion dollars in unaudited contracts with private companies, meaning there is no way to tell whether goods and services were ever actually delivered to the Defense Department.

“The Pentagon can’t manage what it can’t measure, and Congress can’t effectively perform its constitutional oversight role if it doesn’t know how the Pentagon is spending taxpayer dollars,” Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) said in an email response to Reuters. “Until the Pentagon produces a viable financial audit, it won’t be able to effectively prioritize its spending, and it will continue to violate the Constitution and put our national security at risk.”

Coburn and Senator Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) have introduced bipartisan legislation to limit funding for new Pentagon programs and prohibit the purchase of new technology if the Defense Department is not ready for audits by 2017.

That the Pentagon is bad at tracking taxpayer money is nothing new. In fact, on the day before the terror attacks on 9/11 that lead to more than a decade of ramped up military spending, then Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announced, “According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 Trillion dollars in transactions.”

Rumsfeld went on to say that America’s “adversary is closer to home, it’s the Pentagon bureaucracy.”

The next day, however, the Trade Centers fell and talk about wasteful military spending was forgotten.

http://personalliberty.com/pentagon-cant-account-for-8-5-trillion-taxpayer-dollars/

Reply
Feb 7, 2016 08:42:53   #
rebob14
 
payne1000 wrote:
The dark blue slice is the one which should give everyone pause. . .
OOPPPPSSSS!!!!! What's that soft squishy little thing you're standing on??? One can only wish your graphic was accurate; it would then more closely follow the Constitution.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.