One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Look Closely at This Federal Spending Chart.
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Feb 6, 2016 10:33:41   #
payne1000
 
The dark blue slice is the one which should give everyone pause. . .



Reply
Feb 6, 2016 10:43:43   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
payne1000 wrote:
The dark blue slice is the one which should give everyone pause. . .
Source?

Which Republican said that?

Do you have any basis other than your hatred of Republicans to make this post?

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 10:50:21   #
littlebit
 
payne1000 wrote:
The dark blue slice is the one which should give everyone pause. . .


I would do a little bit of research before putting something like this out. Good makes you look really stupid.
Spending
BreakdownBreakdown
Total Government Spending for 2016
Pensions
Defense
Education

Type of Spending Values
Pensions 1.3
Health Care 1.4
Education 1
Defense 0.9
Welfare 0.5
Other Spending 1.6

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/breakdown

It took all of 30 seconds to go to Google search and get an answer.

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2016 10:54:46   #
payne1000
 
Super Dave wrote:
Source?

Which Republican said that?

Do you have any basis other than your hatred of Republicans to make this post?


I don't "h**e" anyone. I have almost equal disrespect for both Democrats and Republicans because they both take orders from the wealthy Neocon cabal which has taken over U.S. foreign policy. My comment was on the size of U.S. military budget which funds illegal invasions of sovereign nations.

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 11:16:29   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
payne1000 wrote:
The dark blue slice is the one which should give everyone pause. . .


I don't know where you got this POS graph, but it is just like all your posts...PURE 100% BULLS**T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In reality, it is ONLY 20% (in this last budget)!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 11:16:46   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
payne1000 wrote:
I don't "h**e" anyone. I have almost equal disrespect for both Democrats and Republicans because they both take orders from the wealthy Neocon cabal which has taken over U.S. foreign policy. My comment was on the size of U.S. military budget which funds illegal invasions of sovereign nations.


You're full of s**t!

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 11:25:59   #
iFrank Loc: San Antonio
 
payne1000 wrote:
The dark blue slice is the one which should give everyone pause. . .


And that's because Obama has given people the need to apply and receive assistance. I blame Obama for causing the dollar to weaken by working against the economy, borrowing billions from any nation that will buy our securities. Then he gives free money to the world with no regard to his oath that he took as POTUS. He a greasy black banana in a suit.

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2016 11:47:58   #
3jack
 
Super Dave wrote:
Source?

Which Republican said that?

Do you have any basis other than your hatred of Republicans to make this post?


Here you go.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/19/pat-toomey-budget-welfare-senate-gop_n_1437613.html

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 11:59:41   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 


WTF does this have to do with the bogus posting on military spending??? Payne1000 shows 57% being spent, when in reality it is 20%.

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 12:27:34   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
That's a 4 year old article.

And your f**e graph isn't on it.

I do appreciate you putting the link up, but it still doesn't add credibility to your obviously false post.

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 12:34:27   #
payne1000
 
littlebit wrote:
I would do a little bit of research before putting something like this out. Good makes you look really stupid.
Spending
BreakdownBreakdown
Total Government Spending for 2016
Pensions
Defense
Education

Type of Spending Values
Pensions 1.3
Health Care 1.4
Education 1
Defense 0.9
Welfare 0.5
Other Spending 1.6

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/breakdown

It took all of 30 seconds to go to Google search and get an answer.


The information provided by your link is not provided by the U.S. government. It is put out by one man who writes for the right-wing "American Thinker." Maybe you need to do a little more research. I would suggest you not post any chart which lists Social Security as a deficit. Social Security pays for itself and always has.

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2016 12:41:41   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
payne1000 wrote:
The information provided by your link is not provided by the U.S. government. It is put out by one man who writes for the right-wing "American Thinker." Maybe you need to do a little more research. I would suggest you not post any chart which lists Social Security as a deficit. Social Security pays for itself and always has.


Man, you're priceless. You post an absolute PHONY chart and have the gall to jump on some one who points it out! Next time try and use RELIABLE sources instead of comic books. BTW, SS does not pay for itself!!!!!! If the average person collects SS benefits for seven years, they have drawn out everything they ever paid in plus interest. That is the problem with SS, people are living longer and drawing out more than they ever paid in. The same is true with Medicare. Go to: http://www.usadebtclock.com/ and note the unfunded liabilities for SS and Medicare.

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 12:47:07   #
payne1000
 
JMHO wrote:
Man, you're priceless. You post an absolute PHONY chart and have the gall to jump on some one who points it out! Next time try and use RELIABLE sources instead of comic books. BTW, SS does not pay for itself!!!!!! If the average person collects SS benefits for seven years, they have drawn out everything they ever paid in plus interest. That is the problem with SS, people are living longer and drawing out more than they ever paid in. The same is true with Medicare. Go to: http://www.usadebtclock.com/ and note the unfunded liabilities for SS and Medicare.
Man, you're priceless. You post an absolute PHONY... (show quote)


The link you provided does not show who compiles the information. Why should it have any more credibility than the chart posted? You don't post any sources to back up your claims about the solvency of Social security.

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 13:04:05   #
3jack
 
JMHO wrote:
WTF does this have to do with the bogus posting on military spending??? Payne1000 shows 57% being spent, when in reality it is 20%.


I doesn't have s**t to do with military spending, but it says a lot about the republican approach to assisting the needy and poor, so eff yourself and read the article. BTW, why are you responding to a post directed to another poster? Are you his fluffer?

Reply
Feb 6, 2016 13:06:17   #
3jack
 
Super Dave wrote:
That's a 4 year old article.

And your f**e graph isn't on it.

I do appreciate you putting the link up, but it still doesn't add credibility to your obviously false post.


Didn't think you would like it because it answers your request for proof of a statement.

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.