This will end the Hillary e-mail story (Page 9): TYPICAL, OF LIBTURDISM! MOLDY, WAS SERIOUSLY BRAIN INJURED IN THE WAR!.......{ GOTTA LEAVE HIM ALONE}...

Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich

son of witless wrote:

Just like the rest of the Liberals here. None of you will lower yourselves to providing proof of the things you post.

TYPICAL, OF LIBTURDISM! MOLDY, WAS SERIOUSLY BRAIN INJURED IN THE WAR!.......{ GOTTA LEAVE HIM ALONE}

moldyoldy

Ronald Hatt wrote:

TYPICAL, OF LIBTURDISM! MOLDY, WAS SERIOUSLY BRAIN INJURED IN THE WAR!.......{ GOTTA LEAVE HIM ALONE}

Bush White House email controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The Bush White House email controversy surfaced in 2007 during the controversy involving the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys. Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House emails were available, because they were sent via a non-government domain hosted on an email server not controlled by the federal government. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978, and the Hatch Act.[1] Over 5 million emails may have been lost.[2][3] Greg Palast claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove emails, leading to damaging allegations.[4] In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been lost.[5]

The administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee,[6] for various communications of unknown content or purpose. The domain name is an abbreviation for "George W. Bush, 43rd" President of the United States. The server came public when it was discovered that J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas.[7] Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc."[8]) and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"[9]), but, unlike these two servers, gwb43.com has no Web server connected to it it is used only for email.[10]

The "gwb43.com" domain name was publicized by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who sent a letter to Oversight and Government Reform Committee committee chairman Henry A. Waxman requesting an investigation.[11] Waxman sent a formal warning to the RNC, advising them to retain copies of all emails sent by White House employees. According to Waxman, "in some instances, White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications."[12] The Republican National Committee claims to have erased the emails, supposedly making them unavailable for Congressional investigators.[13]

On April 12, 2007, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel stated that White House staffers were told to use RNC accounts to "err on the side of avoiding violations of the Hatch Act, but they should also retain that information so it can be reviewed for the Presidential Records Act," and that "some employees ... have communicated about official business on those political email accounts."[14] Stanzel also said that even though RNC policy since 2004 has been to retain all emails of White House staff with RNC accounts, the staffers had the ability to delete the email themselves.

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

moldyoldy wrote:

Bush senior gave saddam permission to invade kuwait. Then he attacked him once kuwait gave him what he wanted. Probably sme oil leases. There was no yellow cake in iraq. The CIA gave saddam gas to use against iran, so we are just as guilty for the kurds getting gassed. The main problem is who decided that we have to be the worlds police.

There you go again. Reading the blogs of conspiracy theory crowd. I suggest that you quit smoking crack.

mouset783 Loc: Oklahoma

moldyoldy wrote:

Fox watchers are more misinformed than those who never watch news.

I owe you an apology We were taught honesty and integrity during basic training for those that didn't have it. I hadn't realized it was discontinued during your service. You seem to think your never ending source of far left websites and your uncanny ability to cut and paste has some kind of value. When it comes to stating your own views you fall completely on your face.Yo make a rediculous statement like "he was elected twice by a large margin" A community organizer from the most corrupt city besides DC on the planet are not really excellent qualifications Trust me on this one I grew up in Cicero. I wonder if being the first Black might have helped.I certainly hope this insane logic doesn't follow with first woman.Then you follow that with tripe about Fox news.You sir are on a roll but downhill is not good for you. Have a nice day.

Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich

moldyoldy wrote:

Bush White House email controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The Bush White House email controversy surfaced in 2007 during the controversy involving the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys. Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House emails were available, because they were sent via a non-government domain hosted on an email server not controlled by the federal government. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978, and the Hatch Act.[1] Over 5 million emails may have been lost.[2][3] Greg Palast claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove emails, leading to damaging allegations.[4] In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been lost.[5]

The administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee,[6] for various communications of unknown content or purpose. The domain name is an abbreviation for "George W. Bush, 43rd" President of the United States. The server came public when it was discovered that J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas.[7] Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc."[8]) and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"[9]), but, unlike these two servers, gwb43.com has no Web server connected to it it is used only for email.[10]

The "gwb43.com" domain name was publicized by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who sent a letter to Oversight and Government Reform Committee committee chairman Henry A. Waxman requesting an investigation.[11] Waxman sent a formal warning to the RNC, advising them to retain copies of all emails sent by White House employees. According to Waxman, "in some instances, White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications."[12] The Republican National Committee claims to have erased the emails, supposedly making them unavailable for Congressional investigators.[13]

On April 12, 2007, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel stated that White House staffers were told to use RNC accounts to "err on the side of avoiding violations of the Hatch Act, but they should also retain that information so it can be reviewed for the Presidential Records Act," and that "some employees ... have communicated about official business on those political email accounts."[14] Stanzel also said that even though RNC policy since 2004 has been to retain all emails of White House staff with RNC accounts, the staffers had the ability to delete the email themselves.

Bush White House email controversy br br br From... (show quote)

I think you missed the part about these attorneys, being caught in "scandals", {like the typical librocrat}, ...............& by the way.....didn't Obammy, fire all the Military officers that DIDN'T BUY INTO HIS INSANITY? ? ? ? ?

You think like the typical Libtard, that is cursed with selective memory!

bmac50

You remember what you want to remember and only seem to remember things with a twist. I remember "That sounded like a "dare you" at the time' and Saddam dared, damn fool he was.

moldyoldy wrote:

Then you are blind. I remember when it was revealed by April Glaspie, and then hushed up quickly.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

moldyoldy wrote:

Bush White House email controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The Bush White House email controversy surfaced in 2007 during the controversy involving the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys. Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House emails were available, because they were sent via a non-government domain hosted on an email server not controlled by the federal government. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978, and the Hatch Act. Over 5 million emails may have been lost. Greg Palast claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove emails, leading to damaging allegations. In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been lost.

The administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee, for various communications of unknown content or purpose. The domain name is an abbreviation for "George W. Bush, 43rd" President of the United States. The server came public when it was discovered that J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas. Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc.") and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"), but, unlike these two servers, gwb43.com has no Web server connected to it it is used only for email.

The "gwb43.com" domain name was publicized by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who sent a letter to Oversight and Government Reform Committee committee chairman Henry A. Waxman requesting an investigation. Waxman sent a formal warning to the RNC, advising them to retain copies of all emails sent by White House employees. According to Waxman, "in some instances, White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications." The Republican National Committee claims to have erased the emails, supposedly making them unavailable for Congressional investigators.

On April 12, 2007, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel stated that White House staffers were told to use RNC accounts to "err on the side of avoiding violations of the Hatch Act, but they should also retain that information so it can be reviewed for the Presidential Records Act," and that "some employees ... have communicated about official business on those political email accounts." Stanzel also said that even though RNC policy since 2004 has been to retain all emails of White House staff with RNC accounts, the staffers had the ability to delete the email themselves.

Bush White House email controversy br br br From... (show quote)

Uh...we don't care! We're already doing everything we can to make sure another Bush doesn't end up in the WH! Whattaya want? :lol:

moldyoldy

BigMike wrote:

Uh...we don't care! We're already doing everything we can to make sure another Bush doesn't end up in the WH! Whattaya want? :lol:

A little honesty would be nice. The democrats did not freak out about bush.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

bmac50 wrote:

You remember what you want to remember and only seem to remember things with a twist. I remember "That sounded like a "dare you" at the time' and Saddam dared, damn fool he was.

Ms. Glaspie passed false information . not authorized information. to the Iraqi representative. Ms Glaspie was operating above her pay grade and expressing only her personal best SWAG which was. it seems, completely incorrect.

moldyoldy

After reading up on it I see that cheap Kuwaiti oil was a problem. After saddam invaded we attacked and the oil fields were all burning .the price of oil went up. Bush made a killing

peter11937 Loc: NYS

moldyoldy wrote:

After reading up on it I see that cheap Kuwaiti oil was a problem. After saddam invaded we attacked and the oil fields were all burning .the price of oil went up. Bush made a killing

False statement, prove otherwise.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

moldyoldy wrote:

A little honesty would be nice. The democrats did not freak out about bush.

Er...yeah you did, and in retrospect, I don't blame you! Is that OK for honesty, bro? Now, I'm asking you...please don't vote for that Establishment bitch! On our side...we're doing what we can. You wouldn't believe how entrenched these bastards are!

The difference between our ideologies has been usurped for too long by these dogs who have no conscience, but are guided only by self. Cast off your own Establishment...you may not get another chance for a while.

son of witless

moldyoldy wrote:

A little honesty would be nice. The democrats did not freak out about bush.

And you are qualified to ask for that because why?

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

son of witless wrote:

And you are qualified to ask for that because why?

They freaked out over Bush, which is cool, and this is why; Bush was an Establishment politician. No matter the external forces...a prez can't determine 100% what will happen elsewhere in this fucked up world...an Establishment politician is on the payroll of moneyed interests. Period. He pissed the true believers on the other side off without them being able to put it in the terms I just told you. He lied to the true believers on his own side. He was never for smaller government...ever.

Bill lied to you, true believers! So has Hillary...both from day one! You know they've both always been on the take...special interest vending machines! Bush too!

Screw that! :thumbup: We're doing all we can on our side of the street...hint hint! :lol:

3jack

Super Dave wrote:

No. That ends nothing.

Wrong....... it actually ended before it began. The aftermath is nothing but right wing frothing at the mouth.