Masterful se******n by Trump
Feb 22, 2017 23:32:35 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
I knew better to converse with you. You just can't help being an asshole. In the financial planning world many times the lingo unknow is used when referring to a blind trust. It means of course you are not in control so you really don't know any more what was sold or traded. I have heard that the specific laws do not pertain to the president but members of congress. I will research it. I am sure the Trump people know. I know you consider your time valuable you arrogant prick so don't bother responding to me. I will neither read it or respond. You are a troll and a f**e rumi.
Dr.Dross wrote:
You are one very under-educated person. A blind trust does not mean you (lol, too finny, sorry) "unknow" your property, it means you are not in control of your property. There is only the Constitution that prohibits profiting through his agency as president in gifts, gratuities, or special favor, such as the recent gift from China granting Trump a trademark on his name, that was still in the courts until he personally spoke to Xi Jinping. What a coincidence.
.
.
Feb 22, 2017 23:39:22 #
JFlorio wrote:
Do you even know how a blind trust works? You can't unknow your property. Also there's no legal statute I am aware of demanding Trump put his assets in a blind trust.
That's right, there is not a GD thing to stop Trump from running his billion dollar business and the government in any manner he sees fit, correct!!! So what if he makes a buck or two. He's not taking a salary--look at what Hillary would have done, and she would have taken us for a salary too!!!
Feb 22, 2017 23:44:46 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
I really don't care if he makes a buck or two Petey, as long as it's done legally. Not my business. Did it bother you that Obama is worth millions more than when he became president? Actually doesn't bother me as long as he made it legal. Now I personally would like to see some laws passed that would stop politicians from profiting from, well being politicians. Difference between me and people like you is I v**ed for Trump. I like what he's doing. If he breaks the law I hope they impeach his ass. Your side never wants to hold it's own accountable.
PeterS wrote:
That's right, there is not a GD thing to stop Trump from running his billion dollar business and the government in any manner he sees fit, correct!!! So what if he makes a buck or two. He's not taking a salary--look at what Hillary would have done, and she would have taken us for a salary too!!!
Feb 23, 2017 22:39:59 #
JFlorio wrote:
I knew better to converse with you. You just can't... (show quote)
Extremely funny. Like so many on the Right, after a great gaff, you uselessly scramble to rectify your false or inaccurate statements. You said the opposite of what you now define as "unknow[n]." Before it was something of a joke that Trump would not recognize what he invested in, so why bother. Now you assert, as I did, that he is not in control in a "blind trust." Huge difference! A very silly man. Both of you.
Feb 23, 2017 22:43:17 #
JFlorio wrote:
I really don't care if he makes a buck or two Pete... (show quote)
He cannot make "a buck or two" legally out of his presidency: it is against the Constitution! Any profit or gift or favor domestic or foreign to a president violates the Constitution if he accepts. No wiggle room. And with his lack in decency and t***sparency and honor in refusing to reveal his tax returns, until his impeachment for conflict of interest on two notable counts thus far, the t***h of his nefarious dealings for personal gain riding on his presidency will not be known. But I tell you this now. If Congress attempts to force him to show his tax returns and he has a choice not to if he resigns, he will resign. Something big and destructive to him or his reputation is hidden there.
.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.