One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
This came from a very disgruntled American
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Dec 31, 2013 16:10:04   #
dukeofsc
 
I beg to differ with you all, apparently none of you, well maybe the few who are upset, seems to grasp the fact that this is a "FORCED MANDATE" upon the entire populace without due representation,
(remember: we have to pass it to see whats in it!)
we did this act once before if I recall sometime in the 17 hundreds if I am correct.
When the feds start forcing you to make purchases of any sort, my friends, that cannot be a good sign.

Reply
Dec 31, 2013 17:05:19   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
I am a 77yr old paid into SS for 60yrs & still paying.

I pay taxes on 85 % of my SS.

I pay $364 per month for SS part B & added coverage.

I pay for about the best coverage & I have not used a cent of it to date. I pay because if I should need it I will be glad I have it.


you only pay tax on 85% of your s/s if you make over 32000 above your s/s and are single

Reply
Dec 31, 2013 17:23:37   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
alex wrote:
you only pay tax on 85% of your s/s if you make over 32000 above your s/s and are single


Yes I take in more than 32,000 more per year.

I thought that most would know that is why I would pay taxes on my SS.

I am not crying. I find it easier to spend less than to work harder for money to do things that I can do with out.

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2013 17:44:51   #
squirrelmender Loc: Florida
 
Because his employer health insurance was only 170/month so his new rate is high. I could get a Bronze plan where I would pay 0 for monthly premiums but, have to meet a 6,000 + deductible before the insurance kicks in for any visit to any doctor or ER. . This ins doesn't help me at all considering that I already pay my doctor for the few visits I make each year and it's not enough to even add up to 6,000 so I have to sign up just so the dictator in charge doesn't charge me a fee. Total rip off. Thanks goodness I'm pretty healthy at 59.

Reply
Dec 31, 2013 17:46:13   #
squirrelmender Loc: Florida
 
Because his employer health insurance was only 170/month so his new rate is high. I could get a Bronze plan where I would pay 0 for monthly premiums but, have to meet a 6,000 + deductible before the insurance kicks in for any visit to any doctor or ER. . This ins doesn't help me at all considering that I already pay my doctor for the few visits I make each year and it's not enough to even add up to 6,000 so I have to sign up just so the dictator in charge doesn't charge me a fee. Total rip off. Thanks goodness I'm pretty healthy at 59.

Reply
Dec 31, 2013 19:43:30   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
dukeofsc wrote:
I beg to differ with you all, apparently none of you, well maybe the few who are upset, seems to grasp the fact that this is a "FORCED MANDATE" upon the entire populace without due representation,
(remember: we have to pass it to see whats in it!)
we did this act once before if I recall sometime in the 17 hundreds if I am correct.
When the feds start forcing you to make purchases of any sort, my friends, that cannot be a good sign.
You got it, duke. What is being ignored here is that the ACA is not really about providing "affordable care" at all. The idea that it does is just smoke and mirrors. Healthcare and health insurance are both the mask the ACA wears and its foot in the door, and this has fooled many into seeing only a silver lining on a very dark cloud.

Newsflash: it isn't a cloud, it is a hammer--a BIG ONE.

Reply
Dec 31, 2013 20:12:04   #
dukeofsc
 
I hear ya, this is the point that really irritates me to no end, why in the world or should I say how in the world those who v**ed in favor, (the citizens I mean not the i***ts in DC), you have got to be looking at it with rose colored glass's on, don't get me wrong and I would appreciate no irrate RSVP's via this forum, I'm all for universal healthcare, the problem I have is my uncle "SAM" forcing me to enroll, if you look at this with a clear head and open mind, its more flawed than welfare, and believe you me if you think welfare is the model then there's absolutely no hope for you, this is nothing more than glamorized liberal f*****m, a re gifted present with a new bow, now how stupid are you all going to feel when the deification hits the rotary oscillator and you wind up with a face full?

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2013 23:16:22   #
carolyn
 
jasfourth401 wrote:
Sorry to break it to you Carolyn, but I'm rich and retired at 49. My income guarantees I'll get no subsidies for healthcare, little if any social security and much higher medicare payments than the average American. And I'm okay with that. It's a tiny price to pay for success.

I also find your comment exceptionally sad. It's an angry, bitter, whiny rant based on false assumptions. Do yourself a favor and debate the issues and drop the snarky accusations. It's tacky and low class.


If you paid into SS regardless of your income, you can draw from it so long as you paid in to earn enough credits. They go by credits now, or they did when my husband and I signed up to draw whereas they used to go by quarters paid in.

So you are rich, eh? If you are so rich, then I don't see why you would even worry about healthcare insurance anyway? But to some of us, even a hundred dollar difference per month makes a great difference on what we have to live on all year long. And what makes it so much worse is the fact that so many that have never had a tax-paying job in their lives will get their insurance at zero or practically zero cost with very little deductible. This is nothing more than an award for more people to give up looking for a job and go on the dole. So tell me. What is this government's plan by doing this? Are they wanting our country to fail so they can step in and take control?

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 10:37:21   #
JONDO
 
carolyn wrote:
If you paid into SS regardless of your income, you can draw from it so long as you paid in to earn enough credits. They go by credits now, or they did when my husband and I signed up to draw whereas they used to go by quarters paid in.

So you are rich, eh? If you are so rich, then I don't see why you would even worry about healthcare insurance anyway? But to some of us, even a hundred dollar difference per month makes a great difference on what we have to live on all year long. And what makes it so much worse is the fact that so many that have never had a tax-paying job in their lives will get their insurance at zero or practically zero cost with very little deductible. This is nothing more than an award for more people to give up looking for a job and go on the dole. So tell me. What is this government's plan by doing this? Are they wanting our country to fail so they can step in and take control?
If you paid into SS regardless of your income, you... (show quote)
EXACTLY

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 11:12:15   #
carolyn
 
dukeofsc wrote:
I hear ya, this is the point that really irritates me to no end, why in the world or should I say how in the world those who v**ed in favor, (the citizens I mean not the i***ts in DC), you have got to be looking at it with rose colored glass's on, don't get me wrong and I would appreciate no irrate RSVP's via this forum, I'm all for universal healthcare, the problem I have is my uncle "SAM" forcing me to enroll, if you look at this with a clear head and open mind, its more flawed than welfare, and believe you me if you think welfare is the model then there's absolutely no hope for you, this is nothing more than glamorized liberal f*****m, a re gifted present with a new bow, now how stupid are you all going to feel when the deification hits the rotary oscillator and you wind up with a face full?
I hear ya, this is the point that really irritates... (show quote)


Let's face things logically, shall we? Now the logical question would be why does this government seem to WANT people not to work? What possibility would this have in building a strong country and economy? How could any country survive with the majority on some kind of dole, and jobs at a minimum? And why would any government insist in giving i*****l a***ns, who, according to both federal and constitutional Law, are criminals, along with the employers that hire these criminals for less than starvation wages, amnesty? And put them on an already bloated welfare system that has more than tripled in the last 5 years? And why would a government extend the unemployment benefits to make it more lucrative for a person not to work?

Is this simply the graciousness of an all loving government, or is it, as I believe, a plot to o*******w this government to gain total control of it's citizens?

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 13:16:19   #
JONDO
 
carolyn wrote:
Let's face things logically, shall we? Now the logical question would be why does this government seem to WANT people not to work? What possibility would this have in building a strong country and economy? How could any country survive with the majority on some kind of dole, and jobs at a minimum? And why would any government insist in giving i*****l a***ns, who, according to both federal and constitutional Law, are criminals, along with the employers that hire these criminals for less than starvation wages, amnesty? And put them on an already bloated welfare system that has more than tripled in the last 5 years? And why would a government extend the unemployment benefits to make it more lucrative for a person not to work?

Is this simply the graciousness of an all loving government, or is it, as I believe, a plot to o*******w this government to gain total control of it's citizens?
Let's face things logically, shall we? Now the log... (show quote)
DO I FINALLY SEE AND HEAR SOME COMMON SENSE, ITS ABOUT TIME.

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2014 10:56:05   #
carolyn
 
JONDO wrote:
DO I FINALLY SEE AND HEAR SOME COMMON SENSE, ITS ABOUT TIME.


There has been much logic displayed here before but some seem to want to twist the facts around to fit their left-wing points of view. There has been dozens of times when the B******i scandal has been discussed, with the lie that an amateur video started the whole mess. Now the whole world heard both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, plus his little twerp Carney parrot his big, bad boss on this lie. But it was later proven that the video had nothing to do with this fiasco, and then when Obama later relieved the Commanding General of the African command and a Rear-Admiral for questioning his orders to "stand down," and allow these people, including our Ambassador to be systematically murdered, the left-wing dingbats tried to twist the facts around and fall back on the lie that it was the video that caused the "local uprising."

I just saw an item the other day that they are still trying to bring back this lame-brained reason for this atrocity. And they even said they did not take charge of the remaining witnesses and hide them so investigators can question them. Now the big question arises among some of us. ARE THEY EVEN STILL ALIVE!

Reply
Jan 3, 2014 18:49:32   #
jasfourth401
 
carolyn wrote:
If you paid into SS regardless of your income, you can draw from it so long as you paid in to earn enough credits. They go by credits now, or they did when my husband and I signed up to draw whereas they used to go by quarters paid in.

So you are rich, eh? If you are so rich, then I don't see why you would even worry about healthcare insurance anyway? But to some of us, even a hundred dollar difference per month makes a great difference on what we have to live on all year long. And what makes it so much worse is the fact that so many that have never had a tax-paying job in their lives will get their insurance at zero or practically zero cost with very little deductible. This is nothing more than an award for more people to give up looking for a job and go on the dole. So tell me. What is this government's plan by doing this? Are they wanting our country to fail so they can step in and take control?
If you paid into SS regardless of your income, you... (show quote)


You raise three interesting points. You are correct about the current state of social security and the ability to draw a stipend. This inevitably will change though as government benefits will ultimately be means tested by the time I qualify. It's the road both parties are headed down. On the right, it is pitched as fiscal responsibility. On the left, it is pitched as "fairness." It's coming. Guaranteed.

Your point about being rich and not having to worry about any cost really struck a cord with me. And it's because I worry about every expense. That's how I got to where I am. I always look for ways to save. That won't change. I wear that mantle proudly.

And now your last comment: "And what makes it so much worse is the fact that so many that have never had a tax-paying job in their lives will get their insurance at zero or practically zero cost with very little deductible. This is nothing more than an award for more people to give up looking for a job and go on the dole."

This one left me scratching my head. Please note that people that have never had a tax-paying job can't qualify for any ACA subsidy. These folks go straight to medicaid. The folks you claim to be getting an "award" are those with incomes between 14,000 and 45,000 a year. These are hard working lower to lower middle class people. They number just under 40 million households. These folks haven't given up looking for a job. They have one (or two). They are also not on the dole. They work. They pay taxes. They could use a hand with the high cost of healthcare...essentially a medicare subsidy for those under 65. I see no problem with that logic.

Reply
Jan 3, 2014 19:12:27   #
Richard94611
 
If you think that health care decisions determine for lots and lots of people that they should not work, you are mistaken.

Do Hispanics need health care any less than everyone else ? Are they less deserving ? Should we just let Hispanics with serious illnesses die because they don't have and cannot afford health insurance ?

Do you have something against letting the poor live ? I am not a Christian, but I certainly believe we owe health care help to everyone who needs it. Just my opinion, which I am sure you don't agree with. If you want to be a selfish, greedy bastard, join the majority of the folks in this forum.



carolyn wrote:
This came from a very disgruntled American. It is a long read but I believe every open-minded American will appreciate it. Now I already expect repercussion from the left-wing dingbats but that is to expected, is it not?

I am a 54 year old consulting engineer and make between $60,000 and $125,000 per year, depending on how hard I work and whether or not there are work projects out there for me.

My girlfriend is 61 and makes about $18,000 per ear, working as a part time mail clerk.

For me, making $60,000 a year, under Obamacare, the cheapest, lowest grade policy I can buy, which also happens to impose a $5,000 deductible, costs $482 per month.

For my girlfriend, the same exact policy with the same deductible, costs $1 per month.

Don't believe me? just go to "www.coveredca.gov" which is the Obamacare website for California and enter parameters I've mentioned and see for yourself. BTW, my zip code is 93940. You'll need that to enter.

So OK, clearly Obamacare is a scheme that involves putting the cost burden of healthcare on the middle and upper income wage earners. But there is a lot more to it. Stick with me.

I live in Monterey County, in Central California. We have a large land mass but just 426,000 residents-about the population size of Colorado Springs or Omaha.

But we do have a large Hispanic population, including a large number of i*****l a***ns, and to serve this group, we have Natividad Medical Center, a massive, federally subsidized county medical complex that takes up an area about 1/3 the size of the Chrysler Corporation Automobile Assembly plant in Belevedere, Illinois. Natividad has state-of-the-art oprating rooms, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, fully equipped 24 hour emergency rooms, and much more. And medical attention here is essentially full because almost everyone who winds up here is uninsured.

Last year, 2,735 babies were born at Natividad. 32% of these were born to out-of-wedlock teenage mothers, 93% of which were Hispanic. Less that 20% could show proof of citizenship, and 71% listed their native language as Spanish. Of these 876 births, only 40 were covered under any kind of private health insurance. The taxpayers paid for the other 836. And in case you are wondering about the entire 2,735 babies that were born here, less than 24% involved insured coverage or even partial payment on behalf of the patient to the hospital in exchange for services.

Now consider this. If I want to upgrade my policy to a low- deductible premium policy, such as what I had with my last employer, my cost will be $886 per month. But my girlfriend can upgrade her policy for just $4 per month. A total of $48 per year for a zero-deductible, premium health care policy- the kind you get when you work for IBM (except when you work for IBM your healthcare for this type policy runs from $170 per month or more, not $4 per month.

This is my aside... Is there any wonder that so many have dropped out of the job market? We that kept working are the fools because if we had jumped on the bandwagon when Lyndon Johnson started making it so lucrative to become bums we would not have to worry about anything at all now. Just think! Our food would be paid for, our housing paid for, our utilities paid for, our medical would cost us less that a carton of cigarettes a month, we would have a free telephone with ample minutes paid for each month, Our children would get a free clothing allowance each year, we would get a check each month and we would never have to worry about getting laid off from work because we would never have to worry about the degradation of working at a mean old job.

Aren't the Democrats kind to bums?
This came from a very disgruntled American. It is ... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 3, 2014 20:12:41   #
dukeofsc
 
Keep plucking them heart strings , you'll get what you want from this admin no doubt, back, way back in the day, common sense ruled by a wide margin, today under our touchy felly socialist leaning admin and the younger gen who plead every case before the highest courts regardless of how tort it may be will line right up behind you to supply these and anything else you deem should be supplied for free to the poor mass's who are so by no fault of their own, up to and only until by default they finally realize, due to their giving hearts and plucking them heart strings that everyone's on the dole and there's no one left to supply for the demand, think about it for one second, its a suicide mission, the ultimate outcome is desolation and failure, with great power comes great responsibility, we have the admin right now who wield great power but no ones holding them responsible for their actions, so you tell me whats the final outcome?????

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.