Every thing this man has to say can and has been independently verified and he is not the only one that has documented it. Even those people that were involved in creating this, got brave and careless and wrote about what they did, years later.

Burying your head in the sand does not undo what was done.
The world does not depend on you to acknowledge reality, for reality to exist.

The t***h is not bulls**t, the t***h is reality and reality is what it is.

Facts are stubborn things, they don't go away and they do not depend on your belief in them to make them exist.

The Creature From Jekyll Island (by G. Edward Griffin)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu_VqX6J93k

Perhaps if you would open your eyes, you would find your world is not what you think it is. What he wrote about is pretty much common knowledge among the proper circles. Rivers, my dear fellow, you are owned LOCK, STOCK, AND BARREL by those who own the UNITED STATES, INC. Like it or not, think its a conspiracy or not. Its a fact, not theory. You and I are nothing more than "Agricultural Assets" (sheep and cattle) to them.. I was a part of a nationwide movement to unseat the IRS from 1988 to 1996. So, you're the one who needs to take your meds of have another bowl of stupid. The IRS and the Fed Gov are counting on people like you..

Agents of a Foreign Government: A Bizarre Saga by Dan Meador (April, 2000)

An internet friend forwarded an article by Bill Cooper, published in the September 1995 issue of Veritas. The title is "B.A.T.F./IRS Criminal Fraud
Wayne Bentson of Arizona collaborated with Cooper, also of Arizona, to produce a documentary article that would spark a revolution if the syndicated media published it. They went through the index's of the Internal Revenue Code section-by-section, listing regulations as they appear in the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules, then tracking the titles and listed heading for the regulation. Because of the index, they were able to verify many of Coopers authorities and conclusions without reading all of the regulations What they found was the Cooper-Bentson conclusions were reinforced by the index.

There are no implementing regulations for section 7621 of the Internal Revenue Code, authorizing the President to establish 'Revenue Districts' within the States of the Union. Thus, we are regarded as one district. With enactment of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 Federal Income Tax administration had for all practical purposes been turned over to the Bureau of Internal Revenue, Puerto Rico which in 1953 via executive name change became the Internal Revenue Service. (Puerto Rico.)

This account may have never come to light but an Illinois attorney and an Idaho United States Attorney put icing on the cake. The Internal Revenue Service is an agency of a government that is technically foreign to the United States, and the Department of Justice does not have authority to defend IRS personnel in civil or criminal matters.

This information also dovetails nicely into the information put forth by Sherry Jackson and Joe Bannister, former IRS agents turned whistleblowers after wrecking peoples lives for years, then researching the t***h and getting their eyes opened. Sherri Peel Jackson has videos on YouTube for all to watch. (IRS not a part of America, by Sherri Jackson)

The Internal Revenue Service is not a part of the several 50 States and is operated under contract by the Treasury Department on behalf of the International Bankers. {conclusion}

Check here for full article by Dan Cooper if the gov hasn't pulled it again: (it is extremely damaging to the claims of the Federal Government that you owe them some form of 'Tax' or they have some form of 'Authority' over your life and property.)

http://www.svpvril.com/irs_dm_bc.html

You may also be interested in; ZeroHedge - Why the Fourth Branch of the US Government Needs To Be Abolished, and Why "Authority" Should Never Be Trusted Find the full article here:

http://zerohedge.com/article/why-fourth-branch-us-government-needs-to-be-abolished...

Further, from The Informer; When is a Social Security number not a Social Security Number AND Will the real Beneficiary please stand up..
Two questions arise when looking at the IRS administration Code of Federal Regulations (CFR's) which is the title to this article. Two separate conclusions from this article are - 1) The corresponding SSN of an Individual may also designate an estate (Making all of us 'Estates'?) and 2) illustrating the outright lawlessness of the Federal Government as only congress has the right to make 'Laws' and Regulations. NOT an agency of a "Foreign Entity" with no authority on "American soil"....

The Informer..... Since 1994, a newsletter dedicated to the T***H about BAD Government.... Stuff the Media won't or doesn't report.

Also, in the class action lawsuit of 1938 Brubaker vs. Union Pacific Railroad, et.al. the judge made an astonishing admission in regards to the Federal Government - "in relation to a state, the Government of the United States is a foreign entity.." (this from a case in 1938).

So, there it is. Add in the subject matter of the original post, and there you have what is called "The Reality of The Situation".. (like it or not)

The first step in solving a problem, is to recognize that there is a problem.

You seem to assume, that because you don't know about something, it doesn't exist.

Try doing some homework and learning some history.

The information has been out there for quite some time, it's really not new.
At least it's not new to people who have paid attention to what's going on around them.

The Creature From Jekyll Island (by G. Edward Griffin)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu_VqX6J93k

You know, pal, you don't know s**t about me...okay? I happen to be a conservative, and a huge Obama h**er and a huge Trump supporter. I just don't buy into the conspiracy crap that some of you so-called conservative mindless twits do. Go back and read what started this thread, it was a posting about the IRS collecting money for the UN. Then, the individual who posted the thread tries to back up his argument with a cited court case that had absolutely NOTHING to do with the original accusation. The original post was nothing more than conspiracy bulls**t...with no actual proof. So, if you want to believe that bulls**t, have at it...but, to call me worthless? Fuck you!

So you're telling me that the Federal Reserve Bank, that has nothing to do with the Federal Government, has nothing in reserve and is not a bank, is not perpetuating the biggest fraud in the history of the world?

Your trying to tell me that there are no c*******ts, g*******ts or one world government people trying to undermine this country?

You trying to tell me that there is no such person as George Sorros or are you telling me that he's just an average business man conducting business?

You can't win a fight if you can't acknowledge the enemies your fighting!

Oh, and then there's the Islamists, I suppose they're just the figment of some conspirialists imagination as well?

So you're telling me that the Federal Reserve Bank, that has nothing to do with the Federal Government, has nothing in reserve and is not a bank, is not perpetuating the biggest fraud in the history of the world?

Your trying to tell me that there are no c*******ts, g*******ts or one world government people trying to undermine this country?

You trying to tell me that there is no such person as George Sorros or are you telling me that he's just an average business man conducting business?

You can't win a fight if you can't acknowledge the enemies your fighting!

Oh, and then there's the Islamists, I suppose they're just the figment of some conspirialists imagination as well?