Turk182

The IRS is not who you think they are, IRS agents are neither trained nor paid by the United States government. Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 92, the IRS is trained under the direction of the Division of Human Resources United Nations (U.N.) and the Commissioner (International), by the office of Personnel Management.

In the 1979 edition of 22 USCA 278, "The United Nations," you will find Executive Order 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under the direction of the Secretary of the United Nations. Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91, the IRS entered a "Service Agreement" with the US Treasury Dept (See Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg.5967, Reorganization (BANKRUPTCY!!!)Plan No. 26) and the Agency for International Development.

This agency is an international paramilitary operation and according to the Dept of the Army Field manual (1969) 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sec. 1-7(b) & 1-6, Sec. 1-10 (7) (c) (1), and 22 USCA 284, includes such activities as, "Assumption of Full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area."

The IRS is also an agency/member of a 169 Nation pact called the International Criminal Police organization, or INTERPOL, found at 22 USCA 263a. The memorandum of Understanding (MOU), between the Secretary of Treasury, AKA the corporate governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank" (International Monetary Fund, and the International Bank of for reconstruction and Development), indicated that the Attorney General and it's associates are soliciting and collecting information for foreign principles; the international organizations, corporations, and associations, exemplified by 22 USCA 286f.

According to the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, the Attorney General is the permanent representative to INTERPOL, and the Secretary of Treasury is the alternate member. Under Article 30 of the INTERPOL constitution, these individuals must expatriate their citizenship. They serve no allegiance to the United States of America.

The IRS is paid by "The Fund" and "The Bank". Thus it appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service agents are "Agents of a Foreign Principle" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938" for private, not public, gain !

The IRS is directed and controlled by the corporate Governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank". The Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS collection agency are both privately owned and operated under private statutes. The IRS operates under public policy, not the Constitutional Law, and in the interest of our nation's foreign creditors.

The Constitution only permits Congress to lay and collect taxes. It does not authorize Congress to delegate the tax collection power to a private corporation, which collects our taxes for a private bank, the Federal Reserve, who then deposits it into the Treasury of the IMF !

The IRS is not allowed to state that they collect taxes for the United States Treasury. They only refer to "The Treasury."

Rivers

Where did you come up with this bulls**t?

reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.

This is simple ,, FLAT TAX !! shut down IRS ..

Turk182

You must be walking in "BULLS**T" every day because you went to the school of fools and did not learn the t***h that the government has been hiding for years.
Court Rulings Relating To Income Taxes

SUPREME COURT CASES:
a.. 1818: U.S. v. Bevans, 16 U.S.336. Establishes two separate jurisdictions within the United States Of America: 1. The "federal zone" and 2. "the 50 States". The I.R.C. only has jurisdiction within the "federal zone".
"The exclusive jurisdiction which the United States have in forts and dock-yards ceded to them, is derived from the express assent of the states by whom the cessions are made. It could be derived in no other manner; because without it, the authority of the state would be supreme and exclusive therein," 3 Wheat., at 350, 351.
a.. 1883: Butchers' Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746. Defines labor as property, and the most sacred kind of property
Trezevant v. City of Tampa, 741 F.2d 336 (11th Cir. 1984): US Court of Appeal awarded $65,217.39/hour for false imprisonment.

Rivers

No, I walk around in reality. I don't walk around in fear due to a bunch of conspiracy theories. Take your meds, or have another bowl of stupid.

Turk182

Way to go Rivers.
Now we have just found another shill.
Did you read the court case? I don't print bulls**t, I back up what I say.
Prove it to be different. You can't.

Rivers

Okay moron, WTF does this have to do with the IRS being under the UN and collecting taxes for the UN...your original accusation????

United States v. Bevans
16 U.S. 336 (1818)

Annotate this Case
Syllabus | Case
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Bevans, 16 U.S. 3 Wheat. 336 336 (1818)

United States v. Bevans

16 U.S. (3 Wheat.) 336


Syllabus

Admitting that the third article of the Constitution of the United States, which declares that "the judicial power shall extend to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction," vests in the United States exclusive jurisdiction of all such cases, and that a murder committed in the waters of a state where the tide ebbs and flows is a case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, Congress has not, in the eighth section of the Act of 1790, ch. 9, "for the punishment of certain offenses against the United States," so exercised this power as to confer on the courts of the United States jurisdiction over such murder.

Quaere whether courts of common law have concurrent jurisdiction with the admiralty over murder committed in bays, &c., which are enclosed parts of the sea?

Congress having, in the eighth section of the Act of 1790, ch. 9, provided for the punishment of murder, &c., committed "upon the high seas or in any river, haven, basin, or bay out of the jurisdiction of any particular state," it is not the offense committed but the bay, &c. in which it is committed that must be out of the jurisdiction of the state.

The grant to the United States in the Constitution of all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction does not extend to a cession of the waters in which those cases may arise or of general jurisdiction over the same. Congress may pass all laws which a necessary for giving the most complete effect to the exercise of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction granted to the government of the union, but the general jurisdiction over the place, subject to this grant, adheres to the territory as a portion of territory not yet given away, and the residuary powers of legislation still remain in the state.

Congress have power to provide for the, punishment of offenses committed by perms serving on board a ship of war of the United States, wherever that ship may lie. But Congress have not exercised that power in the case of a ship lying in the waters of the United States; the words "within any fort, arsenal, dockyard, magazine, or in any other place or district of country under the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States," in the third section of the Act of 1790, ch. 9, not extending to a ship of war, but only to objects in their nature fixed and territorial.

Page 16 U. S. 337

The defendant, William Bevans, was indicted for murder in the Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts. The indictment was founded on the 8th section of the Act of Congress of 30 April, 1790, ch. 9. and was tried upon the plea of not guilty. At the trial it appeared in evidence that the offense charged in the indictment, was committed by the prisoner on the sixth day of November, 1816, on board the United States ship of war Independence, rated a ship of the line of seventy-four guns, then in commission, and in the actual service of the United States, under the command of Commodore Bainbridge. At the same time, William Bevans was a marine duly enlisted, and in the service of the United States, and was acting as sentry regularly posted on board of said ship, and Peter Leinstrum (the deceased, named in the indictment) was at the same time duly enlisted and in

Page 16 U. S. 338

the service of the United States as cook's mate on board of said ship. The said ship was at the same time lying at anchor in the main channel of Boston harbors in waters of a sufficient depth at all times of tide for ships of the largest class and burden, and to which there is at all times a free and unobstructed passage to the open sea or ocean. The nearest land at low water mark to the position where the ship then lay, on various sides is as follows, viz., the end of the long wharf so called in the Town of Boston, bearing southwest by south, half south at the distance of half a mile; the western point of William's Island, bearing north by west, at the distance between one quarter and one-third of a mile; the navy yard of the United States at Charlestown, bearing northwest half-west, at the distance of three quarters of a mile, and Dorchester point so called, bearing south southeast, at the distance of two miles and one quarter, and the nearest point of governor's Island so called (ceded to the United States), bearing southeast half-east, at the distance of one mile and three quarters. To and beyond the position or place thus described, the civil and criminal processes of the courts of the State of Massachusetts, have hitherto constantly been served and obeyed. The prisoner was first apprehended for the offense in the District of Massachusetts.

The jury found a verdict that the prisoner, William Bevans, was guilty of the offense as charged in the indictment.

Upon the foregoing statement of facts, which was

Page 16 U. S. 339

stated and made under the direction of the court, the prisoner, by his counsel, after verdict, moved for a new trial, upon which motion two questions occurred, which also occurred at the trial of the prisoner. 1. Whether, upon the foregoing statement of facts, the offense charged in the indictment, and committed on board the said ship as aforesaid, was within the jurisdiction of the State of Massachusetts, or of any court thereof. 2. Whether the offense charged in the indictment, and committed on board the said ship as aforesaid, was within the jurisdiction or cognizance of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. Upon which questions the judges of the said circuit court were at the trial, and upon the motion for a new trial, opposed in opinion, and thereupon, upon the request of the district attorney of the United States, the same questions were ordered by the said court to be certified under the seal of the court to the Supreme Court to be finally decided.

Page 16 U. S. 386

Turk182

The defendant, William Bevans, was indicted for murder.

It has nothing to do with taxes.

Rivers

No s**t, Dick Tracy! So, you quoted the court case to back up your original assertion that the IRS is collecting taxes for the UN, so wtf does this case have to do with your original assertion? You cited the case, I didn't.

Homestead

The first step in solving a problem, is to recognize that there is a problem.

You seem to assume, that because you don't know about something, it doesn't exist.

Try doing some homework and learning some history.

The information has been out there for quite some time, it's really not new.
At least it's not new to people who have paid attention to what's going on around them.

The Creature From Jekyll Island (by G. Edward Griffin)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu_VqX6J93k

Rivers

It's BULLS**T!!!!!! It's nothing but loony-toons conspiracy theory crap, and anyone with an ounce of gray matter between the ears knows it is! Man, some of you tin-foil hat people cease to amaze me. Get a hobby or something....sheeessshhh.

Homestead

Dude........................history is not bulls**t.

History is what happened and what happened created what we have today.

Just because you can't handle he t***h, does not make it go away.

Now go lie down before you hurt yourself, grown-ups are talking.

Rivers

T***h?????? There is NO t***h here, just bulls**t! Prove it is ACTUAL T***HFUL history....I challenge you to. This whole subject/post is NOT actual history, it is opinionated conspiracy theory. Wake up!

Grown ups are talking? Grown ups don't espouse bulls**t....so, stop the kiddie talk.

Homestead

Every thing this man has to say can and has been independently verified and he is not the only one that has documented it. Even those people that were involved in creating this, got brave and careless and wrote about what they did, years later.

Burying your head in the sand does not undo what was done.
The world does not depend on you to acknowledge reality, for reality to exist.

The t***h is not bulls**t, the t***h is reality and reality is what it is.

Facts are stubborn things, they don't go away and they do not depend on your belief in them to make them exist.

The Creature From Jekyll Island (by G. Edward Griffin)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu_VqX6J93k

trucksterbud

Perhaps if you would open your eyes, you would find your world is not what you think it is. What he wrote about is pretty much common knowledge among the proper circles. Rivers, my dear fellow, you are owned LOCK, STOCK, AND BARREL by those who own the UNITED STATES, INC. Like it or not, think its a conspiracy or not. Its a fact, not theory. You and I are nothing more than "Agricultural Assets" (sheep and cattle) to them.. I was a part of a nationwide movement to unseat the IRS from 1988 to 1996. So, you're the one who needs to take your meds of have another bowl of stupid. The IRS and the Fed Gov are counting on people like you..

Agents of a Foreign Government: A Bizarre Saga by Dan Meador (April, 2000)

An internet friend forwarded an article by Bill Cooper, published in the September 1995 issue of Veritas. The title is "B.A.T.F./IRS Criminal Fraud
Wayne Bentson of Arizona collaborated with Cooper, also of Arizona, to produce a documentary article that would spark a revolution if the syndicated media published it. They went through the index's of the Internal Revenue Code section-by-section, listing regulations as they appear in the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules, then tracking the titles and listed heading for the regulation. Because of the index, they were able to verify many of Coopers authorities and conclusions without reading all of the regulations What they found was the Cooper-Bentson conclusions were reinforced by the index.

There are no implementing regulations for section 7621 of the Internal Revenue Code, authorizing the President to establish 'Revenue Districts' within the States of the Union. Thus, we are regarded as one district. With enactment of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 Federal Income Tax administration had for all practical purposes been turned over to the Bureau of Internal Revenue, Puerto Rico which in 1953 via executive name change became the Internal Revenue Service. (Puerto Rico.)

This account may have never come to light but an Illinois attorney and an Idaho United States Attorney put icing on the cake. The Internal Revenue Service is an agency of a government that is technically foreign to the United States, and the Department of Justice does not have authority to defend IRS personnel in civil or criminal matters.

This information also dovetails nicely into the information put forth by Sherry Jackson and Joe Bannister, former IRS agents turned whistleblowers after wrecking peoples lives for years, then researching the t***h and getting their eyes opened. Sherri Peel Jackson has videos on YouTube for all to watch. (IRS not a part of America, by Sherri Jackson)

The Internal Revenue Service is not a part of the several 50 States and is operated under contract by the Treasury Department on behalf of the International Bankers. {conclusion}

Check here for full article by Dan Cooper if the gov hasn't pulled it again: (it is extremely damaging to the claims of the Federal Government that you owe them some form of 'Tax' or they have some form of 'Authority' over your life and property.)

http://www.svpvril.com/irs_dm_bc.html

You may also be interested in; ZeroHedge - Why the Fourth Branch of the US Government Needs To Be Abolished, and Why "Authority" Should Never Be Trusted Find the full article here:

http://zerohedge.com/article/why-fourth-branch-us-government-needs-to-be-abolished...

Further, from The Informer; When is a Social Security number not a Social Security Number AND Will the real Beneficiary please stand up..
Two questions arise when looking at the IRS administration Code of Federal Regulations (CFR's) which is the title to this article. Two separate conclusions from this article are - 1) The corresponding SSN of an Individual may also designate an estate (Making all of us 'Estates'?) and 2) illustrating the outright lawlessness of the Federal Government as only congress has the right to make 'Laws' and Regulations. NOT an agency of a "Foreign Entity" with no authority on "American soil"....

The Informer..... Since 1994, a newsletter dedicated to the T***H about BAD Government.... Stuff the Media won't or doesn't report.

Also, in the class action lawsuit of 1938 Brubaker vs. Union Pacific Railroad, et.al. the judge made an astonishing admission in regards to the Federal Government - "in relation to a state, the Government of the United States is a foreign entity.." (this from a case in 1938).

So, there it is. Add in the subject matter of the original post, and there you have what is called "The Reality of The Situation".. (like it or not)