One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The well-reasoned Insanity of the Right:: down the rabbit hole...giggling
Page <prev 2 of 24 next> last>>
Dec 18, 2013 10:36:38   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
stymie wrote:
We don't need a third party, we need to take back our party. You will see third party candidates galore in the future e******ns, paid for by the opposition, to dilute our v**er turnout. Has worked well for them recently in several state e******ns.THE DEBT CEILING
*
Democrats don't understand THE DEBT CEILING
*
Republicans don't understand THE DEBT CEILING
*
Libertarians don't understand THE DEBT CEILING BUT ARE SOMEWHAT CLOSER THAN THE OTHER LOONS
*
SO....NO ONE understands THE DEBT CEILING
* Thus - Allow me to explain...
Let's say you come home from work and find there has been
a sewer backup in your neighborhood. Your home has sewage
all the way up to your ceilings.What do you think you should do?
A. Raise the ceilings or
B. Pump out the s**t?
Your choice is coming in November, 2014.
Don't miss the opportunity.

P.S. This was sent to me by another concerned citizen and I thought it worth sharing.
We don't need a third party, we need to take back ... (show quote)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Long before O's first e******n, some of us were warning people about him, about his henchmen, about his philosophy. Most didn't listen. Now I am warning people about the possibility of never having another e******n. IF I am right this time, then how do we accomplish the goals with an e******n which during the best of times is corrupt, and this is NOT the best of times? If Barry decides to stay in office, he will, and NO ONE will kick him out. If there were guts to do that, it would have been done a long time ago. Once he commits THAT breech of the Constitution, it is DEAD, and we live under tyranny.

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 10:43:37   #
jay-are
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Long before O's first e******n, some of us were warning people about him, about his henchmen, about his philosophy. Most didn't listen. Now I am warning people about the possibility of never having another e******n. IF I am right this time, then how do we accomplish the goals with an e******n which during the best of times is corrupt, and this is NOT the best of times? If Barry decides to stay in office, he will, and NO ONE will kick him out. If there were guts to do that, it would have been done a long time ago. Once he commits THAT breech of the Constitution, it is DEAD, and we live under tyranny.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br Long before O's first... (show quote)


My money is still on that prediction coming true. I made the same prediction in September of 2008.

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 11:08:52   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
jay-are wrote:
My money is still on that prediction coming true. I made the same prediction in September of 2008.


I would not take bets on President Obama trying to extend his time in office, beyond constitutionally-stated limits. That would a mistake of monstrous proportions, and, as such...I don't see that happening.

As it is, there are those who would attempt to end his current term, early.

We shall see.

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2013 11:25:46   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
OldSchool wrote:
I don't totally disagree with your philosophy, but I take exception to just v**e for your principle, when you know your candidate is not going to win. I am currently a registered Republican, but am getting more and more disenchanted with the RINOs, like you I'm probably closer to being a Libertarian. I v**ed for Romney in this last e******n, and he was probably my fourth or fifth choice in the primaries. But, I knew what Obama was like and I knew what he planned to do in a second term. I would have v**ed for Alfred E Newman just to stop Obama from being re-elected. I liked Gary Johnson for the most part, but I knew he couldn't win. The only reason Romney lost was because close to 4 million registered Republicans stayed home. Would Romney made the best president? We'll never know, but we do know we have the worst president in U.S. history still occupying the Oval Office and still destroying this country one executive order at a time.
I don't totally disagree with your philosophy, but... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 11:45:36   #
jay-are
 
slatten49 wrote:
I would not take bets on President Obama trying to extend his time in office, beyond constitutionally-stated limits. That would be a mistake of monstrous proportions, and, as such...I don't see that happening.

As it is, there are those who would attempt to end his current term, early.

We shall see.


If you are so sure he won't stay in office, why won't you take bets? If you won't take bets, it means you aren't sure you are right. I still believe I am right, that he will not leave, and will keep believing it until I am proven wrong.

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 11:48:44   #
jay-are
 
slatten49 wrote:
I would not take bets on President Obama trying to extend his time in office, beyond constitutionally-stated limits. That would be a mistake of monstrous proportions, and, as such...I don't see that happening.

As it is, there are those who would attempt to end his current term, early.

We shall see.


A mistake of monstrous proportions? What do you call Obamacare? He did that didn't he? Wasn't that completed by means beyond constitutional limits?

There are hundreds of examples of Obama going beyond constitutionally-stated limits.

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 12:17:53   #
stymie
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Long before O's first e******n, some of us were warning people about him, about his henchmen, about his philosophy. Most didn't listen. Now I am warning people about the possibility of never having another e******n. IF I am right this time, then how do we accomplish the goals with an e******n which during the best of times is corrupt, and this is NOT the best of times? If Barry decides to stay in office, he will, and NO ONE will kick him out. If there were guts to do that, it would have been done a long time ago. Once he commits THAT breech of the Constitution, it is DEAD, and we live under tyranny.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br Long before O's first... (show quote)


I could be wrong, it wouldn't be the first time but I just do not see that happening. The question is would the left support his actions of attempting to remain in control. As much as they love him I would hope their love of country would override their inability to see what he is really doing to this great Republic. We know the right will rise up against it, that would be the proverbial last straw. I strongly believe the military will back the Republic and not the President and therein is where he loses control should he attempt such extremes. We are seeing a reversal in attitude toward the President now for the first time due to the ACA (Obamacare) debacle and it may very well be his undoing. The reason simply being unlike all the other so-called scandals is that this one effects the individual. Amazing how clarity finally shines through when one is directly affected. Bottom line is the 2014 e******n outcome will determine whether Harry Reid stays at the reigns or we have the option of actually accomplishing Hope and Change for the future. Hope we can change the direction he and the President has us on.

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2013 13:21:39   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
slatten49 wrote:
I would not take bets on President Obama trying to extend his time in office, beyond constitutionally-stated limits. That would a mistake of monstrous proportions, and, as such...I don't see that happening.

As it is, there are those who would attempt to end his current term, early.

We shall see.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm not arguing because we have differing opinions. Am merely asking you why you believe he would not go beyond THAT constitutionally-stated limits, when he has gone well beyond others, some of which have as much (almost) serious consequences as would setting himself up as dictator. Obamacare, Fast and Furious, B******i, obeying the parts of any law while disobeying what he doesn't like, pathological lying without seeming to be remorseful when found out, etc. What have you observed in his character that I have missed that says that once his term is up, he becomes just another former President? I don't think this is his rodeo. He seems to have a handler who has some big money and some strong desire for total control, and it seems to me his handler is working for some definite purpose(s), and is not about to be denied. If he needs Obama as front man for another decade, so be it. I hope, sincerely hope that I am wrong as can be. Time shall tell. By that time we will probably be unable to communicate.

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 13:44:59   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm not arguing because we have differing opinions. Am merely asking you why you believe he would not go beyond THAT constitutionally-stated limits, when he has gone well beyond others, some of which have as much (almost) serious consequences as would setting himself up as dictator. Obamacare, Fast and Furious, B******i, obeying the parts of any law while disobeying what he doesn't like, pathological lying without seeming to be remorseful when found out, etc. What have you observed in his character that I have missed that says that once his term is up, he becomes just another former President? I don't think this is his rodeo. He seems to have a handler who has some big money and some strong desire for total control, and it seems to me his handler is working for some definite purpose(s), and is not about to be denied. If he needs Obama as front man for another decade, so be it. I hope, sincerely hope that I am wrong as can be. Time shall tell. By that time we will probably be unable to communicate.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br I'm not arguing because we hav... (show quote)


We simply disagree. As you state, "time will tell".

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 13:50:05   #
jay-are
 
slatten49 wrote:
We simply disagree. As you state, "time will tell".


Tasine wrote: Obamacare, Fast and Furious, B******i, obeying the parts of any law while disobeying what he doesn't like, pathological lying without seeming to be remorseful when found out, etc.
_________________________________

You don't agree that these actions are in total disregard of the Constitution?

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 14:36:11   #
bluejacket
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
There will never be agreement when you say some one has no principles.

It is saying that your way is the only way.

I am sure you have good values but.
You undue every thing you try to put across when you do that.

I for one will stand toe to toe with you & point by point stand behind my principles.

I am also sure that there is more room for you in my view of the world than there is for me in your world.



well said , when someone deals in absolutes they tend to get bogged down in paradox's as their logic is extended , when dealing with human beings absolutes do not fit well

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2013 16:56:25   #
oldladyfromwaco
 
LOL....jay-are....isn't it nice that we agree on something! The v**ers CAN fix it, but the "machines' pick and choose the candidates, those who will toady to their wishes....do exactly what they want.
So.....an outlet for your energy and drive and to change the situation of which you write is to get involved at the highest level in your county and state politics and express your opinion. Get your friends, family, in-laws, out-laws, and the neighbors involved. Take the family dog!
jay-are......when I used to sit in church as a child, the minister would sometimes say, "We can start a revival right here right now! We can change the world!" Well, no one ever did.....but, politically, like the lady who began the TP, one person at a time.....reaching out to another who reaches out to another.....can take our country back. LOL It's almost like the ad on TV about unneutered cats....one in a year could possibly compound to something like 187,000 cats. Now, young man, that's a LOT of cats=v**es.
So, get with it, kid....do this country some GOOD!

A few minutes later, jay-are.....you could go to Black Listed News...BLN....and read some interesting articles...particularly on about "If you can't be on Rothkeaph's(sp) list.....written by someone who knows what is truly going on.


jay-are wrote:
I agree completely. And I add that I blame the v**ers, not the i***ts in office. The v**ers can fix it, and they are the only ones who can. That is how this country was founded.

It is time for the v**ers to be responsible and take responsibility for the mess and for cleaning up the mess.

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 17:07:28   #
Brian Devon
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Long before O's first e******n, some of us were warning people about him, about his henchmen, about his philosophy. Most didn't listen. Now I am warning people about the possibility of never having another e******n. IF I am right this time, then how do we accomplish the goals with an e******n which during the best of times is corrupt, and this is NOT the best of times? If Barry decides to stay in office, he will, and NO ONE will kick him out. If there were guts to do that, it would have been done a long time ago. Once he commits THAT breech of the Constitution, it is DEAD, and we live under tyranny.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br Long before O's first... (show quote)


You are indeed paranoid. President Obama and Michele are already considering the right place to raise their daughters after they leave the White House. The only exception to the two term rule will remain FDR. He governed during exceptional times, WWII, which required political acomodations by all. We do have a 22nd amendment which will be honored. You might want to save your worry for things that might really happen. The main people who drum up fear on this issue are right wing politicos and radio personalities. Why? Fear sells...especially when you are selling books and charging huge speaker fees. Unless you have a book deal or speaking schedule you might want to dispense with the fear-mongering.

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 17:13:28   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Brian Devon wrote:
You are indeed paranoid. President Obama and Michele are already considering the right place to raise their daughters after they leave the White House. The only exception to the two term rule will remain FDR. He governed during exceptional times, WWII, which required political acomodations by all. We do have a 22nd amendment which will be honored. You might want to save your worry for things that might really happen. The main people who drum up fear on this issue are right wing politicos and radio personalities. Why? Fear sells...especially when you are selling books and charging huge speaker fees. Unless you have a book deal or speaking schedule you might want to dispense with the fear-mongering.
You are indeed paranoid. President Obama and Miche... (show quote)


That is what keeps, and has kept, the Democrats in office.

Reply
Dec 18, 2013 17:31:50   #
boofhead
 
stymie wrote:
I could be wrong, it wouldn't be the first time but I just do not see that happening. The question is would the left support his actions of attempting to remain in control. As much as they love him I would hope their love of country would override their inability to see what he is really doing to this great Republic. We know the right will rise up against it, that would be the proverbial last straw. We are seeing a reversal in attitude toward the President now for the first time due to the ACA (Obamacare) debacle and it may very well be his undoing. The reason simply being unlike all the other so-called scandals is that this one effects the individual. Amazing how clarity finally shines through when one is directly affected.
I could be wrong, it wouldn't be the first time bu... (show quote)


The risk here is that you impune common sense to Democrats, who have not shown any tendency toward that state of mind for a long time.

I vacillate between accusing all Democrats (and Liberals and Progressives) of being Evil, and also trying to give them some benefit of the doubt by accusing them instead of blindly following Democrat ideals and policies. In the second case they might not be evil themselves, but merely dupes and fools with perhaps good intentions.

Wh**ever the true state of mind, it matters not. The democrat ideals are as close to truly evil as we have seen this century. They will lead to the same destructive outcomes that we saw so often in the last century, with millions dead around the world.

History shows us that the despots start slow and work up to what they truly want, which is domination and control. Obamacare is an egregious example, but taking down a cross from a monument to the fallen or expelling a student for biting his PopTart into the shape of a gun are those incremental steps needed to push the agenda. We become accustomed to the little nudges and don't realise how far down the path to our own loss of liberty we have come until it is too late.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 24 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.