faithistheword wrote:
You're right, as usual, banjojack. And wat the Koch Bros. do is all above board and legal, contrary to what Soros does. I heard that the SEIU counted v**es all over the country, AND the v****g machines are OWNED BY SOROS! That's how that POS won!
Thank you. I'm always right, except for the times I'm not.
banjojack wrote:
Thank you. I'm always right, except for the times I'm not.
I have the same standard for myself. Works! :mrgreen:
You heard, faith. Where?
Certainly not in any fact-based information.
Diebold and it's subsidiaries have about 55-60% of the US market. Diebold was cited for failure to take steps to ensure 'minimal security standard" for protecting machines from fraud.
Then Diebold EO Walden O'Dell was a major contributor to the 2004 e******n of George W. Bush. After a s**tstorm of controversy, Diebold sold part of it's v****g machine business to a Brazilian subsidiary and changed the name of it's remaining US-based v**er machine business.
Diebold remains embroiled in a s**tstorm of litigation for tit's failure to protect v**er information, it's harassment of whistle blowers, etc.
Soros doesn't own any v****g machine business. If he did, the right would have done the same thing George W. Bush's Justice Department did to Diebold in 2005-2007.
You Really should do some basic research before making these half-assed statements. It makes you look like a fool.
Google Diebold v****g systems and Walden O'Dell and tell me what you come up with.
faithistheword wrote:
You're right, as usual, banjojack. And wat the Koch Bros. do is all above board and legal, contrary to what Soros does. I heard that the SEIU counted v**es all over the country, AND the v****g machines are OWNED BY SOROS! That's how that POS won!
PS: some states, including states with Republican majorities, have moved away from Diebold in recent years due to the stench the company name gives off. My guess, just a guess, is that they still hold about 50% of all v****g machine contracts.
banjojack wrote:
I take it that you do not consider George Soros, who wields far more influence than the Koch Brothers, or wh**ever imaginary influence you think Romney has, to be a problem. Let's not forget SEIU, who counted the v**es in Nevada, for Harry Reid.
Of course, but as I said, if we don't start small, the majority will just allow themselves to be led in wh**ever direction they are pointed by these scoundrels.
Yeah, yeah, the Koch boys gave a quarter billion plus to Romney and weren't going to ask for any favors had Romney been elected. Sure, sure. I've got a bridge you might be interested in.
George Soros is the Democrat's Koch boys-of course he expects something for his contributions. And, if caught breaking the law or doing something unethical, or if any politician he gave money to is caught doing the same, he and they should be punished.
So far, nothing yet but rumor and innuendo. Spoutings about "Soros owns v****g machines" a lie that doesn't jibe with the actions of the Bush II justice department actions against Diebold, a real maker of v****g machines and a major GOP contributor. . ( Bush II had the decency to go against one of his own contributors, their crimes we so obvious-and so many states had already started actions against Diebold.) Again, a faith lie and no response. Let's move on to the next h**e-mongering point.
When you get something real, something you can say happened and is documented by reputable sources, let me know.
banjojack wrote:
I take it that you do not consider George Soros, who wields far more influence than the Koch Brothers, or wh**ever imaginary influence you think Romney has, to be a problem. Let's not forget SEIU, who counted the v**es in Nevada, for Harry Reid.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.