Ricko Loc: Florida

tdsrnest-damn you are thick!! That comment makes stupid look smart. Nobody in the Bush administration had an unsecured private server either in a bathroom closet in Colorado or in the basement of their personal residence on which both government and private business was conducted using one email account. It was Hillary who made it possible for Russia, China and others to hack her server and obtain some 20,000 emails many of which are classified TS and above. She deserves indictment for that alone, not counting her money laundering scheme. Egypt just sentenced two Al jazzera workers to death for leaking documents to Qatar which impacted Egypt's national security. In the Obama administration, 20K documents are made available to the enemy and the perpetrator is running for POTUS. Based on what we already have learned, Hillary should not only be indicted but also convicted. Failure to do so would be a travesty and show the world that our justice system only applies to the average citizen and not the wealthy. Bush has been out of office for nearly 8 years but you seem to be unable to blame the current president for anything. You have an infatuation with both Bush and Trump that is making you sound mentally unstable. You cannot defend the indefensible. Good Luck America !!!

Ricko Loc: Florida

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

He doesn't try to defend his side because it is INDEFENSIBLE. He merely tries to tear down the opponent. Never argue with a lefty as long as he has no facts to present......and that will be SELDOM. Their entire argument is "We're good. You're bad" because that is the ONLY way they can argue because facts stand solidly in their way.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

That covers it Tasine.
The dirt in both parties needs to be cleaned out.
Some real Republicans/conservatives are giving it a go.
Go Trump Go.
BTW; The Bushes were not conservative. They were Bilderberger/CFR stooges. NWO perps.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
I have no trouble believing that about Bush 41, but I DO have trouble believing Bush 43 is involved to any degree in such. He is just too Texan for such. I almost feel as though I know him as I've had one friend pretty close to him (his pastor in Texas) and another who accidentally met him at a Christmas church service where he and Laura helped with the ceremony in Austin. I've known both those friends my entire life and trust them implicitly. They thought he was O.K., and he identified with the military - the men loved him and he loved them......not a NWO in my view. Jeb? Not worth the effort of typing.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

BushII was just a not so bright plant; to carry on his Father's CFR/Bilderberg agenda. CFR/Bilderberger Cheney called the shots"

Cheney on CFR, Council on Foreign Relations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOAk-7F1EVU

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

DEAL. One at a time.

Hillary first, then Obama, Lynch, ...by the time we run out of current t*****rs we'll all be dead long before we get to Bush, but to make you happy let's get em all....in order...starting with criminal Hillary and work bsckwatds!

buffalo Loc: Texas

Unfortunately, the b***h clinton will never be held accountable for her criminality, lying, treason, fraud, trading government favors for contributions to her and slick willies tax dodging slush fund because she would take too many Wall Street and DC elite down with her, starting with the t*****rous head n****r in charge. I read where Billy boy Gates donated $25 MILLION to their slush fund.

In regards to Clinton’s money from Wall Street firms, consider the article “Delamaide: Wall Street Is In Hillary’s Corner,” written by Darrell Delamaide for USA Today. Here, Delamaide writes,

Behind the scenes, Hillary Clinton’s campaign for president belies the Wall Street reform rhetoric that she uses to appeal to left-wing Democratic v**ers.

It was Deep Throat’s reputed advice to reporters in the Watergate scandal that made “follow the money” the iconic slogan for those seeking to ferret out corruption in U.S. politics.

But the political slush fund in Nixon’s 1972 re-e******n campaign seems quaint in the wake of Citizens United, super PACs and the even darker pools of campaign funds that are the forms of corporate payoffs to politicians nowadays.

Much of the money is impossible to follow as dubious non-profit organizations mask the identity of their donors and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce fights efforts to make companies disclose their political contributions.

However, we can still see the tip of the iceberg through the tatters of campaign finance law that remain. And what that tip tells us is that Wall Street is still squarely behind Clinton.

….

One of the things making it “complicated” might be the unstinting support Clinton is getting from Wall Street.

An analysis of the most recent federal campaign contribution data by the Huffington Post found Clinton in the lead in donations from Wall Street with $432,610 from bank executives, employees and their spouses.

Republican hopefuls Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio trailed with $353,150 and $105,669, respectively.

Delamaide points out that these types of donations, however, are only one small avenue from which Wall Street money is able to find itself in to the Clinton coffers. He writes,

Again, this is the tip of the iceberg, because it doesn’t include funds flowing into many super PACs and the very dark 501(c)(4) organizations like Americans for Prosperity that ostensibly promote social welfare but are shams for political advocacy.

This is on top, in Clinton’s case, of the millions she and her husband, the former president, collected in “speaking fees” in the months prior to the official declaration of her candidacy, including from Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and other Wall Street firms.

These ties are well known, but the fact that this support continues in the face of Clinton’s leftish rhetoric tells us Wall Street is not too worried about anything Clinton may do if she were to win the e******n.

This susceptibility to influence by mega-donors is not confined to Wall Street or financial services.

In a report this week on Clinton’s ambitious plans for increasing renewable energy, The New York Times quoted her own press secretary as noting that these goals met the bar to win her donations from hedge fund billionaire and environmentalist Tom Steyer. (The report also noted her plans would require new legislation that would be difficult to pass.)

As important as the money trail is, there are other indications behind the scenes that Clinton does not envisage any radical changes — or even any significant restrictions — on Wall Street.

Her top advisers include two former investment bankers who have a history of being soft on financial regulation. Both held high positions in Clinton’s State Department and would be obvious candidates for cabinet posts in a new Clinton administration.

Tom Nides, a veteran of Morgan Stanley and a former chairman of the main financial services lobbying group Sifma (Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association), was deputy secretary of state under Clinton.

Robert Hormats, a longtime vice chairman at Goldman Sachs and currently vice chair of Kissinger Associates, was an under secretary during Clinton’s tenure at State.

It was President Bill Clinton, let us not forget, who brought Goldman Sachs co-chairman Robert Rubin and his coterie of Wall Streeters into his administration and championed the financial deregulation that led to the 2008 financial crisis.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Robert Rubin - Robert Edward Rubin CFR
Robert Hormats, a longtime vice chairman at Goldman Sach -
Tom Nides, a veteran of Morgan Stanley and a former chairman of the main financial services lobbying group Sifma (Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association), was deputy secretary of state under Clinton. - Thomas R. Nides CFR

Tom Steyer - hedge fund billionaire and environmentalist

Source: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/cfrall1.htm#d

Airforceone

What's sickening is you Mondsy morning QB that know everything after the facts.

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

Turdboy: You wouldn't know a fact if it fracked you in the ass!!!!!!

fullspinzoo

The Turd is just a total i***t who loves Obama because he is black. It certainly couldn't be because of his accomplishments. I asked for 10. They couldn't name five. Worst president ever.

Airforceone

Clinton guilt is based on conspiracy theories show me any hard evidence other than the BS that is made up in the right wing hack sites. Just use a little common sense. The right wing has been writing this BS about the Clintons for the last 30 years but nothing has been proven. It's right wing h**e is all you have.

Bush has 13 embassies bombed nothing happens. Bush has 2 million emails deleted nothing happens Bush gets this country into a phony war nothing happens bush creates torture nothing happens,, so don't tell me this Clinton BS is not born out of right wing h**e.

Airforceone

What the hell are you talking about. You just h**e everything about Obama so you will believe any of the right wing conspiracy theories