Like her or not, Ann Coulter hits a home run (Page 8): Right on!

Smokie

PawneeCounty wrote:

Hey I have always liked Ann Coulter and her commentary is normally a grand slam homer this one is no exception.

Right on!

Smokie

Loki wrote:

For the last time, she is not a wench, she is a harridan with a harpy's tongue. She is a liar, an accomplice to murder, and an amoral b***h, but she is NOT a wench. A wench is a pretty, perky young waitress. Hillary is the worn out old whore at the end of the bar cadging drinks.

Thanks for setting the recorder straight on that!

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Loki wrote:

Fauxcahantas. Heap f**e Injun squaw typical Democrat. Wantum my wampum. Yours, too. Ugh.

I like your pigeon English Loki. Very eloquent; and so right on.

The Demums may wantum to switchum.
A Beaded bag for Muchum Baggage.

Loki Loc: Georgia

eagleye13 wrote:

I like your pigeon English Loki. Very eloquent; and so right on.

The Demums may wantum to switchum.
A Beaded bag for Muchum Baggage.

How come me not thinkum of that? Ugh.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

eagleye13 wrote:

I like your pigeon English Loki. Very eloquent; and so right on.

The Demums may wantum to switchum.
A Beaded bag for Muchum Baggage.

"pigeon" English?

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

LAPhil wrote:

"pigeon" English?

Feather talk:-)

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

eagleye13 wrote:

Feather talk:-)

Don't mean to get too nitpicky here, but the word is "pidgin".

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

No problem. I think you got my point. Having fun with the language.

LAPhil wrote:

Don't mean to get too nitpicky here, but the word is "pidgin".

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

PeterS wrote:

Hillary will destroy the United States? I think yo... (show quote)

What wage increases? Check your stats. Middle class wage earners make LESS today than before Obama took office.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

LAPhil wrote:

Nice cop-out. You have no argument, so you simply accuse me of not paying attention instead of making your own case. Why don't you just be honest and admit it? And who said anything about Hillary?

Why don't you be honest and admit you ignore what all know.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

LAPhil wrote:

Nice cop-out. You have no argument, so you simply accuse me of not paying attention instead of making your own case. Why don't you just be honest and admit it? And who said anything about Hillary?

You are the cop out. This has been discussed thoroughly in this thread and others. For.you to.pretend you don't know is asinine. Get up to speed or go away. You're wasting my time wanting another rehash of the.pertinent details.

If you are this out of it burn.your v**er ID.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Smokie wrote:

The judge is racially biased.

He knows. He is being a troll

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Docadhoc wrote:

You are the cop out. This has been discussed thoroughly in this thread and others. For.you to.pretend you don't know is asinine. Get up to speed or go away. You're wasting my time wanting another rehash of the.pertinent details.

If you are this out of it burn.your v**er ID.

You're still basically admitting you have no argument. I presented you with some facts and you couldn't rebut them, so now you say you don't want to because it's a waste of your time. I hope you never take up anything intellectually challenging, and certainly not the law. You could never be so intellectually dishonest and not expect to get caught.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

LAPhil wrote:

You're still basically admitting you have no argument. I presented you with some facts and you couldn't rebut them, so now you say you don't want to because it's a waste of your time. I hope you never take up anything intellectually challenging, and certainly not the law. You could never be so intellectually dishonest and not expect to get caught.

You are wasting my time. Your questions were answered here before you asked and you know it. The information has been discussed in depth in this thread and others so don't play stupid or arrogant. You sound like a fool. Back the thread up and read or shut up. You are just another dumb liberal who has no argument for anything you say so all you do is.try to keep people off balance.

Either be serious or hit the bricks.

Everything.you wanted is here in spades and if.you can't keep up that's your problem. I'm not posting it all again for the 4th time. If you can't find jt...tough. You are wasting my time. I***t.

PeterS

Loki wrote:

Hillary a Centrist? At least Obama i said /i he ... (show quote)

First off the ruling on the second amendment was wrong. No where does the second say a thing about self defense and it specifically says that government maintains the right to regulate. That means that if the only thing allowed was a BB gun it would meet the criteria established for the second amendment. The founders didn't want a freestanding army. It was Georges use of a freestanding army that allowed him to suppress the American people. This is why we were supposed to maintain a "Well Regulated M*****a" so the army couldn't be used against the people and we had sufficient,'Well Trained' forces to protect the country. Well instead of following the constitution we now have the largest freestanding army in the world. So what is the purpose of the second Amendment today? Not to protect this country, which was it's original intent. Instead, it's so every paranoid redneck pecker wood can feel like he is protected from the "GOVERNMENT!" That's it. That's why you guys are so dead set on having WMD at your disposal. If it was simply self defense a six shot 44 magnum would do just fine. How many people did Dirty Harry k**l with his? A friend of my wife's shot a rapist with a .38 and it did the job just fine. Hell the cops even gave her back the bullets when the inquest was over. For self defense it's placement that matters not how many bullets you can spray. You only need that when you want to k**l a lot of people in a hurry as our shooter in Orlando did. There an AR-15 has proven itself the weapon of choice.

As for our southern boarder. The only way to stop i*****l i*********n is for businesses to stop hiring them. That I know of, your man Cruz was the only one who was able to single out where the real problem lies. Where we need to step up enforcement is with businesses that are prone to hiring i******s. Do that, and hit them with fines large enough that they pay attention, and we won't have a problem with i*****l a***ns in this country. But no one is willing to do that. Not Trump and not Hillary. So instead you are settling for a placebo and nothing more...

Look, I'm not trying to drum up support for Hillary. Where the fault lies I don't know but we have allowed ourselves the two worst candidates that I think have ever run for office to be the only ones with a viable chance to get elected. That's sucks and is where our problem lies. We need a third party and need one badly. It's from the lack of diversity that we've allowed ourselves to get into this mess. We generally end up with a situation where we are v****g for the lesser of two evils but it's hard to find good points about either of our candidates today. For me, Trump scares me more than Hillary and the reverse is true for you. I think I will leave it at that and move on...