One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Like her or not, Ann Coulter hits a home run
Page 1 of 11 next> last>>
Jun 9, 2016 10:30:37   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
A different take on the Trump witch hunt.

http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2016/06/08/stunning-new-development-media-calls-trump-r****t-n2175731?utm_source=thdaily&utm_me

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 10:43:28   #
bahmer
 


Boy she hit it out of the park didn't she?

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 10:54:29   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
bahmer wrote:
Boy she hit it out of the park didn't she?

No, she definitely did not. Ann is out to lunch on this one as she nearly always is lately and so are the 100 or so posters on that thread. Trump made a UUUUGE mistake and the media have been totally right to call him out on it.

Reply
 
 
Jun 9, 2016 10:56:18   #
PawneeCounty Loc: Oklahoma USA
 


Hey I have always liked Ann Coulter and her commentary is normally a grand slam homer this one is no exception.

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 10:57:03   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 


I read it on Drudge last night.

No one so far has asked ME for my professional opinion on the matter.

If you want to talk race, you should try talking to a r****t.

And I just happen to be the huckleberry.

As for the question, Is Trump a r****t ?

The answer is yes.

And so is the Clinton wench and her husband.

Si spirante r****t es .

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 11:02:50   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
LAPhil wrote:
No, she definitely did not. Ann is out to lunch on this one as she nearly always is lately and so are the 100 or so posters on that thread. Trump made a UUUUGE mistake and the media have been totally right to call him out on it.


I am not a UUUUGE Trump supporter, but I know bulls**t when I see it. This is a political witch hunt, a suit not filed until years later when it became apparent that Trump would probably win the nomination. Every player in this little charade is a Democrat/hard core Hillary supporter and contributor.
Saying an Hispanic judge of Mexican ancestry with a track record of activism in support of the i*****l a***ns that Trump opposes might be biased is not r****t. Mexican is not a race. Neither is Muslim. R****t has become a catchall term of the left to describe anything they don't like.

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 11:05:45   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
This is another Town Hall article by a writer who actually DOES get it about Trump:

http://townhall.com/columnists/derekh****r/2016/06/09/donald-trumps-biggest-opponent-is-himself-n2175508?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=

Reply
 
 
Jun 9, 2016 11:07:23   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
I read it on Drudge last night.

No one so far has asked ME for my professional opinion on the matter.

If you want to talk race, you should try talking to a r****t.

And I just happen to be the huckleberry.

As for the question, Is Trump a r****t ?

The answer is yes.

And so is the Clinton wench and her husband.

Si spirante r****t es .


For the last time, she is not a wench, she is a harridan with a harpy's tongue. She is a liar, an accomplice to murder, and an amoral b***h, but she is NOT a wench. A wench is a pretty, perky young waitress. Hillary is the worn out old whore at the end of the bar cadging drinks.

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 11:19:39   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
Loki wrote:
For the last time, she is not a wench, she is a harridan with a harpy's tongue. She is a liar, an accomplice to murder, and an amoral b***h, but she is NOT a wench. A wench is a pretty, perky young waitress. Hillary is the worn out old whore at the end of the bar cadging drinks.


Us hill folk git' all discomboobulated when we hyar' them big fancy words.

Ego conveniunt . Quæ est in colubrum .

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 11:33:51   #
PeterS
 


So if the judges ethnicity has influenced his decisions where is the proof? How do you know the judge isn't acting purely based on what the law indicates? If you are going to accuse someone of bias than you need some sort of proof that his actions indicate that. All Donald has done is say the judge is Mexican and I want to build a wall. Well, of the 20% of Mexicans who support Trump most say the reason is because they came here legally and it's time we put a stop to i*****l i*********n--in short they would support a wall. The judges parents came here legally so, unless they've made a statement otherwise, why the assumption that Trumps statements has caused the Judge to be biased?

This "witch hunt" would go no where if Trump hadn't started a fraudulent "university" whose only function was to bilk its students from every penny they had. Poor little Donnie never would have been targeted had he put together a legitimate "school" whose purpose was to educate its students. When the “school” was established in 2005, the New York State Education Department warned that it was in violation of state law for operating without a NYSED license. Trump ignored the warnings. The institution is now called, “Trump Entrepreneur Initiative,” thus the lawsuits!

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 11:35:48   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
Maybe Fox News' Kimberly Guilfoyle is an i*****l i*********n enabling liberally-biased Latina too:

http://therightscoop.com/revealed-fox-news-anchor-is-a-member-of-the-same-la-raza-group-as-trump-u-judge/

(That was sarcasm, in case I left any doubt)

Reply
 
 
Jun 9, 2016 11:53:08   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Loki wrote:
I am not a UUUUGE Trump supporter, but I know bulls**t when I see it. This is a political witch hunt, a suit not filed until years later when it became apparent that Trump would probably win the nomination. Every player in this little charade is a Democrat/hard core Hillary supporter and contributor.
Saying an Hispanic judge of Mexican ancestry with a track record of activism in support of the i*****l a***ns that Trump opposes might be biased is not r****t. Mexican is not a race. Neither is Muslim. R****t has become a catchall term of the left to describe anything they don't like.
I am not a UUUUGE Trump supporter, but I know bull... (show quote)



Reply
Jun 9, 2016 13:02:17   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
PeterS wrote:
So if the judges ethnicity has influenced his decisions where is the proof? How do you know the judge isn't acting purely based on what the law indicates? If you are going to accuse someone of bias than you need some sort of proof that his actions indicate that. All Donald has done is say the judge is Mexican and I want to build a wall. Well, of the 20% of Mexicans who support Trump most say the reason is because they came here legally and it's time we put a stop to i*****l i*********n--in short they would support a wall. The judges parents came here legally so, unless they've made a statement otherwise, why the assumption that Trumps statements has caused the Judge to be biased?

This "witch hunt" would go no where if Trump hadn't started a fraudulent "university" whose only function was to bilk its students from every penny they had. Poor little Donnie never would have been targeted had he put together a legitimate "school" whose purpose was to educate its students. When the “school” was established in 2005, the New York State Education Department warned that it was in violation of state law for operating without a NYSED license. Trump ignored the warnings. The institution is now called, “Trump Entrepreneur Initiative,” thus the lawsuits!
So if the judges ethnicity has influenced his deci... (show quote)


As a matter of fact, there WERE no lawsuits until it looked like Trump would be the nominee. These people had years, literally to file suit and did not do s**t until that happened. The judge's ethnicity is in question because of his activism in pro-i*****l a***n activities. Were he a white Southern Baptist, his activism would still occasion concern. Add to this the law firm that first filed suit are in Hillary's pocket, having given her and Bill more than $650,000 in "speaking fees," and having several of their members maxed out on personal contributions to Hillary. Every member of the prosecution is a Democrat who is closely associated with the Clintons. After years, there were no law suits until Trump began to look like the nominee. I believe it was Harry Truman who said "In politics, there are no accidents. If it happens you can bet someone planned it that way."

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 16:24:26   #
PeterS
 
Loki wrote:
I am not a UUUUGE Trump supporter, but I know bulls**t when I see it. This is a political witch hunt, a suit not filed until years later when it became apparent that Trump would probably win the nomination. Every player in this little charade is a Democrat/hard core Hillary supporter and contributor.
Saying an Hispanic judge of Mexican ancestry with a track record of activism in support of the i*****l a***ns that Trump opposes might be biased is not r****t. Mexican is not a race. Neither is Muslim. R****t has become a catchall term of the left to describe anything they don't like.
I am not a UUUUGE Trump supporter, but I know bull... (show quote)


>>snip<<

The organization was not an accredited university or college and did not confer college credit. In 2011, the company became the subject of an inquiry by the New York Attorney General's office for illegal business practices that resulted in a lawsuit filed in 2013, which remains ongoing. Trump University is also subject to two ongoing class action lawsuits in federal court. The lawsuits have centered around allegations that Trump University misled prospective students into thinking that it was a real university whose instructors were hand-picked by Donald Trump himself, when in fact they were not.

>>end<<

The inquiry into TU started in 2011 and the first lawsuit filled in 2013. It's your contention, not being a uuuuge supporter, that he not only would change sides but would become the Republican party nominee three to five years latter? You would need to be a prophet from your god to see that one coming yet that's what you believe. Loki, you've buried your head so far up "the Donalds'' ass that it's ridiculous. Hillary is a POS and the only POS in this country capable of making her look good is Donald J. Trump. If you want to know what a witch hunt looks like look at any of the actions initiated by conservatives against Obama, or Hillary, for purely political purposes in a effort to discredit them. How about Hillary whacking someone because he might spill the beans on her or Obama's birth certificate being bogus--and that's just for starters!!! You people are known for your witch hunts Loki, so much so that it's actually considered "policy" on part of the republican party. What you've done is look at the bulls**t put out by conservative feeds and "concluded" that Trump is being railroaded. Real objective reasoning there L. It's one thing to support your party and therefore their representative--that's my position on Hillary. But to actually support the person--well that's something else entirely. You used to have a pair Loki. Why don't you take a few minutes and see if you can find them.

Reply
Jun 9, 2016 16:34:16   #
PeterS
 
Loki wrote:
As a matter of fact, there WERE no lawsuits until it looked like Trump would be the nominee. These people had years, literally to file suit and did not do s**t until that happened. The judge's ethnicity is in question because of his activism in pro-i*****l a***n activities. Were he a white Southern Baptist, his activism would still occasion concern. Add to this the law firm that first filed suit are in Hillary's pocket, having given her and Bill more than $650,000 in "speaking fees," and having several of their members maxed out on personal contributions to Hillary. Every member of the prosecution is a Democrat who is closely associated with the Clintons. After years, there were no law suits until Trump began to look like the nominee. I believe it was Harry Truman who said "In politics, there are no accidents. If it happens you can bet someone planned it that way."
As a matter of fact, there WERE no lawsuits until ... (show quote)


TU shut down in 2010 (Trump was still a Hillary supporter in and believed in a womans right to choose in 2010) because of building pressure on it for unethical practices and the formal inquiry started in 2011. The law suits are the product of the inquiries started by the State of NY not something created for political purposes. And yeah, how about Hillary and Bill. They are a POS. You don't need to tell me but when I want to know what real s**t looks like all I have to do is look at Donald, and of course, those that like and therefore support him...

Reply
Page 1 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.