OK makes being a physician a felony
May 20, 2016 14:17:11 #
Super Dave wrote:
As s parent I protect my children. I don't execute them for my convince.
Protecting children is what some call extreme.
Protecting children is what some call extreme.
Your same ol' crappy arguments are boring and insulting.
Consider yourself deleted.
May 20, 2016 19:34:31 #
Morrigan
Loc: Hibernia
jelun wrote:
The facts are that your side keeps losing.
Don't want your partner to have an abortion, don't get her pregnant.
Otherwise, live with the fact that your potential as a parent was found wanting.
Don't want your partner to have an abortion, don't get her pregnant.
Otherwise, live with the fact that your potential as a parent was found wanting.
OK gov. veto's bill.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/okla-governor-vetoes-sweeping-abortion-ban-bill/ar-BBti0bA?li=BBnb7Kz
May 20, 2016 20:29:40 #
Super Dave wrote:
If you can't win an argument, censor the people that do.
There is no argument. It is a news article, perhaps too complicated for really stupid people.
May 20, 2016 20:32:50 #
Morrigan wrote:
Yes, thanks. I did see that.
Thank goodness one elected Republican in that state has a brain.
LOL, more than one, of course. The statement quoted in my initial story was from a Republican so there are a few.
May 20, 2016 22:25:38 #
jelun wrote:
The facts are that your side keeps losing.
Don't want your partner to have an abortion, don't get her pregnant.
Otherwise, live with the fact that your potential as a parent was found wanting.
Don't want your partner to have an abortion, don't get her pregnant.
Otherwise, live with the fact that your potential as a parent was found wanting.
So get her pregnant if you want her to have an abortion. You're sick!
May 20, 2016 22:28:20 #
Morrigan
Loc: Hibernia
mwdegutis wrote:
So get her pregnant if you want her to have an abortion. You're sick!
You need to go back and read what jelun wrote again. Read slowly, now!
You have it totally backwards.
May 20, 2016 22:36:33 #
Morrigan wrote:
You need to go back and read what jelun wrote again. Read slowly, now!
You have it totally backwards.
You have it totally backwards.
"Don't want your partner to have an abortion, don't get her pregnant. "
Maybe I should reword it...
Want your partner to have an abortion, get her pregnant."
Still sick!
May 21, 2016 05:04:09 #
mwdegutis wrote:
"Don't want your partner to have an abortion, don't get her pregnant. "
Maybe I should reword it...
Want your partner to have an abortion, get her pregnant."
Still sick!
Maybe I should reword it...
Want your partner to have an abortion, get her pregnant."
Still sick!
Yes, I recognize that you are, I pity you.
May 23, 2016 00:53:06 #
Morrigan wrote:
The Oklahoma governor knew that bill was badly written and this veto is just a bit of heel-dragging to buy some time. It was poorly worded and would not hold up in court. She knew that, and realized the bigger fight will happen later when someone tries another stronger case before the SC. Before that happens, a lot of other stuff needs to happen. There is a bigger plan afoot, and this bill is not part of it.
Just my opinion. Stay tuned.
May 23, 2016 07:56:38 #
Solange wrote:
The Oklahoma governor knew that bill was badly written and this veto is just a bit of heel-dragging to buy some time. It was poorly worded and would not hold up in court. She knew that, and realized the bigger fight will happen later when someone tries another stronger case before the SC. Before that happens, a lot of other stuff needs to happen. There is a bigger plan afoot, and this bill is not part of it.
Just my opinion. Stay tuned.
Just my opinion. Stay tuned.
Another way to look at it may be that as well as being a Republican the gov is a woman. Here's hoping that informed her decision. I haven't held on to much OK info so I can't support that hope at all. Maybe she is just a true fiscal conservative and doesn't want to throw all that money away fighting for a losing law.
States have a decent amount of leeway in their regulation of abortion, creating a situation in which women don't have access at all is definitely not going to pass SCOTUS.
Texas is going to be great to watch.
May 23, 2016 08:32:01 #
jelun wrote:
...States have a decent amount of leeway in their regulation of abortion, creating a situation in which women don't have access at all is definitely not going to pass SCOTUS.
Texas is going to be great to watch.
Texas is going to be great to watch.
Yeah it's so great murdering unborn children.
May 23, 2016 19:30:24 #
May 23, 2016 19:36:31 #
May 23, 2016 21:20:46 #
Fluffy wrote:
mwdisgusting
What you fail to realize if you would have understood jeloon's post is that I was being sarcastic.
May 24, 2016 00:31:29 #
mwdegutis wrote:
What you fail to realize if you would have understood jeloon's post is that I was being sarcastic.
Not to worry, that poster understands my posts just fine.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.