NEW EXTRA DEADLY Ammunition for Police, Law Enforcement and Military
Apr 28, 2016 04:51:06 #
Apr 28, 2016 14:12:45 #
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
Now that is a bad-assed round. I would like a box of them, for starters.
Apr 28, 2016 15:48:46 #
PoppaGringo wrote:
Now that is a bad-assed round. I would like a box of them, for starters.
They have come down some in price. When they were first introduced last year, the average cost was around $50 for a box of 20. I carry a .40cal S&W and will stick with my Winchester Ranger T's.
Apr 29, 2016 11:10:57 #
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
It can do a lot of damage.
Apr 29, 2016 11:17:09 #
Those rounds (bullets) are outlawed (for OUR MILITARY) the Geneva Convention outlawed expanding bullets.
Apr 29, 2016 13:57:18 #
boatbob2 wrote:
Those rounds (bullets) are outlawed (for OUR MILITARY) the Geneva Convention outlawed expanding bullets.
Technically, they are not expanding bullets. They are designed to penetrate, then fragment.
Apr 29, 2016 15:55:31 #
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
Technically, they are not expanding bullets. They are designed to penetrate, then fragment.
There are various rounds already on the market that do the same fragmentation, but not on the scale of this round. Another point is that these fragmentation rounds do not penetrate completely through the body and consequently reduce the incidence of collateral damage caused by striking an innocent in the line of fire behind the tsrget.
Apr 29, 2016 18:07:31 #
Docadhoc wrote:
There are various rounds already on the market that do the same fragmentation, but not on the scale of this round. Another point is that these fragmentation rounds do not penetrate completely through the body and consequently reduce the incidence of collateral damage caused by striking an innocent in the line of fire behind the tsrget.
Not so sure about that. In the video, I noticed a few fragments escape the ballistics gel. I would say that it does reduce the chance, but I don't think there is any way to eliminate it. Too bad we don't have a "STOP THAT!" gun. If you don't know what it is, you can Google it.
Apr 29, 2016 19:55:39 #
Apr 29, 2016 20:55:19 #
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
Not so sure about that. In the video, I noticed a few fragments escape the ballistics gel. I would say that it does reduce the chance, but I don't think there is any way to eliminate it. Too bad we don't have a "STOP THAT!" gun. If you don't know what it is, you can Google it.
I suppose an errant fragment could get loose but compared to a regular round, a fragmentary greatly reduces the chance of it happening.
Apr 29, 2016 20:59:13 #
boatbob2 wrote:
under the Geneva Convention,,,THIS BULLET IS OUTLAWED....
I believe this round is for poluce, not military.
Apr 29, 2016 22:21:22 #
boatbob2 wrote:
under the Geneva Convention,,,THIS BULLET IS OUTLAWED....
And who are they, to tell us how to wage war? I say screw 'em. If it gives us an edge, I say use it. I mean, it's not like were using chemical weapons. And while I'm at it, screw the UN too. Bunch of useless asswipes.
Apr 29, 2016 22:23:32 #
boatbob2 wrote:
Those rounds (bullets) are outlawed (for OUR MILITARY) the Geneva Convention outlawed expanding bullets.
Isn't it funny, that they ban something like this, yet allow us to use 500 lb. bombs to blow things up?
Apr 30, 2016 09:08:07 #
Im all for,the Police,or,private citizens,using this round (bullet) but,Im not for the military using it,I know its not designed for our military. When OUR Military,shoots the bad guys,they want a clean k**l.
Apr 30, 2016 17:11:41 #
boatbob2 wrote:
Im all for,the Police,or,private citizens,using this round (bullet) but,Im not for the military using it,I know its not designed for our military. When OUR Military,shoots the bad guys,they want a clean k**l.
That round would definitely be a 'clean k**l'. And, I am all for the military using it. Why do you differentiate between the military and the police using it?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.