Tea Party Beats IRS in Federal Court
Mar 25, 2016 08:28:05 #
Super Dave wrote:
A political organization is a group of people. Each person retains their constitutional rights. Each person in that group is allowed free speech.
The right to assemble in groups is another constitutional right.
Liberal's think freedom is the problem. Conservatives know freedom is the solution.
The right to assemble in groups is another constitutional right.
Liberal's think freedom is the problem. Conservatives know freedom is the solution.
No, conservatives look for preferential treatment of those who try to promote the concept of selfishness and h**e that all conservatives share..
Mar 25, 2016 08:33:29 #
permafrost wrote:
No, conservatives look for preferential treatment of those who try to promote the concept of selfishness and h**e that all conservatives share..
The True Story of the Bilderberg Group and What They May Be Planning Now
A Review of Daniel Estulin's book
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-story-of-the-bilderberg-group-and-what-they-may-be-planning-now/13808
Very informative article Striker. Covers what I have studied over 30 years. More like 45.
This is a keeper.
Everyone that really wants to know about the shadow government, and what it has been up to, should copy and save it for future study and reference.
I did.
"For years we've all been hearing about the NWO and etc, always just bits and pieces."
So today Striker spent his morning on this:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-story-of-the-bilderberg-group-and-what-they-may-be-...
That certainly seems like a whole huge and true story! Such that I posted a tickler to that on http://noruler.net
Then Google - CFR,TC,Bilderberg Group
and study further.
Mar 25, 2016 08:35:35 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Tea Party Beats IRS in Federal Court br http://wec... (show quote)
I had seen this good news...keep following it all the way to Lois then Obama....
Mar 25, 2016 08:37:00 #
Super Dave wrote:
There's no freakin' chance it was unintentional. And actually, they can support a candidate, or any candidate that follows their cause.
Freedom of speech and freedom to petition the government says that you may support a candidate without being targeted by the government.
This might be a small victory, and it may be way overdue, but I'll take it.
Freedom of speech and freedom to petition the government says that you may support a candidate without being targeted by the government.
This might be a small victory, and it may be way overdue, but I'll take it.
Agree... :thumbup: :thumbup:
Mar 25, 2016 08:44:00 #
Super Dave wrote:
There's no freakin' chance it was unintentional. And actually, they can support a candidate, or any candidate that follows their cause.
Freedom of speech and freedom to petition the government says that you may support a candidate without being targeted by the government.
This might be a small victory, and it may be way overdue, but I'll take it.
Freedom of speech and freedom to petition the government says that you may support a candidate without being targeted by the government.
This might be a small victory, and it may be way overdue, but I'll take it.
Amen brother!!! You said that right!!!!! And Bravo to the Judge that said do it now.... :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Mar 25, 2016 08:45:31 #
Workinman wrote:
I had seen this good news...keep following it all the way to Lois then Obama....
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: Wishful thinking, may get to Lois but the POS in office, an't happening...Too well "insulated"..Holder on the other hand...Now there's a prime jailbird if I ever thought of one and yet, he's disappeared.......
Mar 25, 2016 08:49:44 #
permafrost wrote:
Hillary is the poster-wench for selfishness.No, conservatives look for preferential treatment of those who try to promote the concept of selfishness and h**e that all conservatives share..
Do you support Hillary's greed?
Mar 25, 2016 09:12:46 #
Super Dave wrote:
Hillary is the poster-wench for selfishness.
Do you support Hillary's greed?
Do you support Hillary's greed?
I have not been a fan of Hillary for years..
To refresh my opinion I glanced over Bills activity for a refresher. Rather then only review the signing of a Republican dream trade agreement or getting a blow job and lying about it..
He time and again torpedoed his supposed allies. If it had not been for the blowup over the blowjob, he may well of tried to privatize SS, remove more regulation which protect us from the corporate plundering. ETC ETC ETC..
Sad to say with Bernie getting secondary coverage in the MSM and only negatives from the Right wing press,Hillery will be the nominee..So she will get the power from my v**e..
Why? In the pathetic e******n, the only candidates who would be worst are anyone on the GOP ticket..
In all American history, I do not think a worst group of useless and maybe dangerous people have run for office..
The next 4 years may well be very hazardous...And bad for the average American....
Mar 25, 2016 09:25:41 #
permafrost wrote:
I have not been a fan of Hillary for years.. br ... (show quote)
Bill started out as a typical l*****t. Like George Wallace, Bill flipped on what he believed after the GOP took Congress in an overwhelming slap at Clinton's liberalism. They flipped again since Obama's e******n, going back to their liberal roots of opposing the things that Bill got right in supporting GOP legislation.
Obama is an Ideologue, as is Cruz as his opposite.
Like Hillary, Trump has been on both sides of most issues.
Mar 25, 2016 09:32:12 #
so get away from these guys! They have been in the White House for many decades;
Some Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Facts
The 3,000 seats of the CFR quickly filled with members of America's elite. Today, CFR members occupy key positions in government, the mass media, financial institutions, multinational corporations, the military, and the national security apparatus.
Since its inception, the CFR has served as an intermediary between high finance, big oil, corporate elitists and the U.S. government. The executive branch changes hands between Republican and Democratic administrations, but cabinet seats are always held by CFR members. It has been said by political commentators on the left and on the right that if you want to know what U.S. foreign policy will be next year, you should read Foreign Affairs this year.
The CFR's claim that "The Council has no affiliation with the U.S. government" is laughable. The justification for that statement is that funding comes from member dues, subscriptions to its Corporate Program, foundation grants, and so forth. All this really means is that the U.S. government does not exert any control over the CFR via the purse strings.
Since 1940, every U.S. secretary of state (except for Gov. James Byrnes of South Carolina, the sole exception) has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and/or its younger brother, the Trilateral Commission. Also since 1940, every secretary of war and every secretary of defense has been a CFR member. During most of its existence, the Central Intelligence Agency has been headed by CFR members, beginning with CFR founding member Allen Dulles. Virtually every key U.S. national security and foreign policy adviser has been a CFR member for the past seventy years.
Almost all White House cabinet positions are occupied by CFR members. President Clinton, himself a member of the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group, employs almost one hundred CFR members in his administration. Presidents come and go, but the CFR's power--and agenda--always remains.
The CFR's Shroud of Secrecy - On its web page, the CFR boasts that its magazine, Foreign Affairs, "is acclaimed for its analysis of recent international developments and for its forecasts of emerging trends." It's not much of a challenge to do so, though, when you play a part in determining what those emerging trends will be.
So are they predicting trends or creating them? The answer is fairly obvious to anyone who has earnestly reflected on the matter.
The CFR fancies itself to represent a diverse range cultural and political interests, but its members are predominantly wealthy males, and their policies reflect their elitist biases. The CFR attempts to maintain the charade of diversity via its Non-Attribution Rule, which allows members to engage in "a free, frank, and open exchange of ideas" without fear of having any of their statements attributed in public. The flip side of this, obviously, is a dark cloud of secrecy which envelopes the CFR's activities.
CFR meetings are usually held in secret and are restricted to members and very select guests. All members are free to express themselves at meetings unrestrained, because the Non-Attribution Rule guarantees that "others will not attribute or characterize their statements in public media forums or knowingly t***smit them to persons who will," according to the Council on Foreign Relations' 1992 Annual Report.
The report goes on to forbid any meeting participant "to publish a speaker's statement in attributed form in any newspaper; to repeat it on television or radio, or on a speaker's platform, or in a classroom; or to go beyond a memo of limited circulation."
The end result is that the only information the public has on the CFR is the information they release for public consumption, which should send up red f**gs for anyone who understands the immense effect that CFR directives have on America's foreign policy. The public knows what the CFR wants the public to know about the CFR, and nothing more. There is one hole in the fog of secrecy, however: a book entitled Tragedy and Hope, written by an "insider" named Dr. Carroll Quigley, mentor of Bill Clinton.
Google: Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral, Commission, Bilderberg Group
Some Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Facts
The 3,000 seats of the CFR quickly filled with members of America's elite. Today, CFR members occupy key positions in government, the mass media, financial institutions, multinational corporations, the military, and the national security apparatus.
Since its inception, the CFR has served as an intermediary between high finance, big oil, corporate elitists and the U.S. government. The executive branch changes hands between Republican and Democratic administrations, but cabinet seats are always held by CFR members. It has been said by political commentators on the left and on the right that if you want to know what U.S. foreign policy will be next year, you should read Foreign Affairs this year.
The CFR's claim that "The Council has no affiliation with the U.S. government" is laughable. The justification for that statement is that funding comes from member dues, subscriptions to its Corporate Program, foundation grants, and so forth. All this really means is that the U.S. government does not exert any control over the CFR via the purse strings.
Since 1940, every U.S. secretary of state (except for Gov. James Byrnes of South Carolina, the sole exception) has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and/or its younger brother, the Trilateral Commission. Also since 1940, every secretary of war and every secretary of defense has been a CFR member. During most of its existence, the Central Intelligence Agency has been headed by CFR members, beginning with CFR founding member Allen Dulles. Virtually every key U.S. national security and foreign policy adviser has been a CFR member for the past seventy years.
Almost all White House cabinet positions are occupied by CFR members. President Clinton, himself a member of the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group, employs almost one hundred CFR members in his administration. Presidents come and go, but the CFR's power--and agenda--always remains.
The CFR's Shroud of Secrecy - On its web page, the CFR boasts that its magazine, Foreign Affairs, "is acclaimed for its analysis of recent international developments and for its forecasts of emerging trends." It's not much of a challenge to do so, though, when you play a part in determining what those emerging trends will be.
So are they predicting trends or creating them? The answer is fairly obvious to anyone who has earnestly reflected on the matter.
The CFR fancies itself to represent a diverse range cultural and political interests, but its members are predominantly wealthy males, and their policies reflect their elitist biases. The CFR attempts to maintain the charade of diversity via its Non-Attribution Rule, which allows members to engage in "a free, frank, and open exchange of ideas" without fear of having any of their statements attributed in public. The flip side of this, obviously, is a dark cloud of secrecy which envelopes the CFR's activities.
CFR meetings are usually held in secret and are restricted to members and very select guests. All members are free to express themselves at meetings unrestrained, because the Non-Attribution Rule guarantees that "others will not attribute or characterize their statements in public media forums or knowingly t***smit them to persons who will," according to the Council on Foreign Relations' 1992 Annual Report.
The report goes on to forbid any meeting participant "to publish a speaker's statement in attributed form in any newspaper; to repeat it on television or radio, or on a speaker's platform, or in a classroom; or to go beyond a memo of limited circulation."
The end result is that the only information the public has on the CFR is the information they release for public consumption, which should send up red f**gs for anyone who understands the immense effect that CFR directives have on America's foreign policy. The public knows what the CFR wants the public to know about the CFR, and nothing more. There is one hole in the fog of secrecy, however: a book entitled Tragedy and Hope, written by an "insider" named Dr. Carroll Quigley, mentor of Bill Clinton.
Google: Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral, Commission, Bilderberg Group
Super Dave wrote:
Bill started out as a typical l*****t. Like George Wallace, Bill flipped on what he believed after the GOP took Congress in an overwhelming slap at Clinton's liberalism. They flipped again since Obama's e******n, going back to their liberal roots of opposing the things that Bill got right in supporting GOP legislation.
Obama is an Ideologue, as is Cruz as his opposite.
Like Hillary, Trump has been on both sides of most issues.
Obama is an Ideologue, as is Cruz as his opposite.
Like Hillary, Trump has been on both sides of most issues.
Mar 25, 2016 09:35:40 #
eagleye13 wrote:
And do what? Hide in a closet? V**e for a lunatic while thinking that my v**e doesn't count?so get away from these guys!
Google: Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral, Commission, Bilderberg Group
Google: Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral, Commission, Bilderberg Group
You stay in the closet. I'll live out here.
Mar 25, 2016 09:36:03 #
Super Dave wrote:
Bill started out as a typical l*****t. Like George Wallace, Bill flipped on what he believed after the GOP took Congress in an overwhelming slap at Clinton's liberalism. They flipped again since Obama's e******n, going back to their liberal roots of opposing the things that Bill got right in supporting GOP legislation.
Obama is an Ideologue, as is Cruz as his opposite.
Like Hillary, Trump has been on both sides of most issues.
Obama is an Ideologue, as is Cruz as his opposite.
Like Hillary, Trump has been on both sides of most issues.
They flip side huh?
A few more notables in Both Parties Serving Bilderbergers CFR/TC/BB AGENDA:
Bush Sr. - CFR,B (R)
Bush Jr? Cabinet CFR (R)
Both Clintons - CFR,TC,B (D)
Jimmy Carter - CFR,TC (D)
Obama & Biden - CFR (D)
Dick Cheney - CFR,TC (R)
Newt Gingrich - CFR (R)
Mitch McConnell - CFR (R)
Rick Perry - BB,2007 (D&R)
John Kerry CFR (D)
John McCain - CFR (R)
Zbig Brzezinski - TC, BB (D)
Heny Kissinger BB,CFR,TC (R) Paul Volker- CFR,TC,BB (D) Alan Greenspan CFR,TC,BB
Ben Bernanke BB
Tim Geithner - CFR,TC BB
David Rockefeller CFR,TC,BB George Soros - CFR,BB (D)
Albert Gore, Jr. CFR,TC (D)
Donald Rumsfeld CFR ,BB(R)
Jacob Jack Lew CFR (D)
Robert Gates BB,CFR,TC (D
Leon Panetta CFR (D)
Lee Hamilton CFR,TC (R)
Robert Reich CFR (D)
Condoleezza Rice CFR (R)
Susan Rice CFR (D)
Ted Cruz (wife) CFR (R)
Donna Shalala CFR/TC (D)
Benjamin Netanyahu CFR88
THE MEDIA:
George Will - CFR,TC (R)
George Stephanopoulos
CFR, BB (D)
William Kristol BB (R) William Buckley Jr. CFR,BB (R)
Tom Brokaw CFR
FOX owner
Rupert Murdock CFR, BB
FOX SPINNERS
John Bolton CFR (R)
Charles Krauthammer CFR(R)
Doug Schoen CFR
Washington Post owner
Katherine Graham CFR,TC,BB
CNBC Spinnner:
Larry Kudlow CFR/88
CNN Spinner:
David Richmond Gergen
BB/CFR/TC/92 (D)
Robert B. Reich CFR (D)
Brian Williams - CFR
In the News:
Haley Barbour CFR (D)
Eric Holder CFR (D)
Larry Summers CFR, BB
Janet Yellen CFR (D)
Chuck Hagel CFR (D)
Sylvia Burwell CFR/11 (D)
Jeh Johnson CFR (D)
Ashton Carter CFR/92 (D)
More Politicians:
Fred Thompson CFR (R)
Charles B. Rangel CFR (D)
Barney Frank CFR (D)
Richard Newton Gardner CFR/RS/TC/84
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (D) CFR/92
Sandra Day O'Connor (R) CFR/92
Robert S. Mcnamara CFR (D)
Warren Christopher CFR (D)
Madeleine Albright CFR (D)
Samuel Richard ("Sandy") Berger CFR/BB (R)
Michael Froman CFR (D)
Military
General David Petraeus CFR,
CIA Director Chuck Hagel CFR
International Bankers - James Wolfensohn Paul Wolfowitz, Alan Greenspan, Tim Geithner CFR,TC,BB
Michael V. Hayden CFR CIA/NSA
Mar 25, 2016 09:36:38 #
Super Dave wrote:
And do what? Hide in a closet? V**e for a lunatic while thinking that my v**e doesn't count?
You stay in the closet. I'll live out here.
You stay in the closet. I'll live out here.
A few more notables in Both Parties Serving Bilderbergers CFR/TC/BB AGENDA:
Bush Sr. - CFR,B (R)
Bush Jr? Cabinet CFR (R)
Both Clintons - CFR,TC,B (D)
Jimmy Carter - CFR,TC (D)
Obama & Biden - CFR (D)
Dick Cheney - CFR,TC (R)
Newt Gingrich - CFR (R)
Mitch McConnell - CFR (R)
Rick Perry - BB,2007 (D&R)
John Kerry CFR (D)
John McCain - CFR (R)
Zbig Brzezinski - TC, BB (D)
Heny Kissinger BB,CFR,TC (R) Paul Volker- CFR,TC,BB (D) Alan Greenspan CFR,TC,BB
Ben Bernanke BB
Tim Geithner - CFR,TC BB
David Rockefeller CFR,TC,BB George Soros - CFR,BB (D)
Albert Gore, Jr. CFR,TC (D)
Donald Rumsfeld CFR ,BB(R)
Jacob Jack Lew CFR (D)
Robert Gates BB,CFR,TC (D
Leon Panetta CFR (D)
Lee Hamilton CFR,TC (R)
Robert Reich CFR (D)
Condoleezza Rice CFR (R)
Susan Rice CFR (D)
Ted Cruz (wife) CFR (R)
Donna Shalala CFR/TC (D)
Benjamin Netanyahu CFR88
THE MEDIA:
George Will - CFR,TC (R)
George Stephanopoulos
CFR, BB (D)
William Kristol BB (R) William Buckley Jr. CFR,BB (R)
Tom Brokaw CFR
FOX owner
Rupert Murdock CFR, BB
FOX SPINNERS
John Bolton CFR (R)
Charles Krauthammer CFR(R)
Doug Schoen CFR
Washington Post owner
Katherine Graham CFR,TC,BB
CNBC Spinnner:
Larry Kudlow CFR/88
CNN Spinner:
David Richmond Gergen
BB/CFR/TC/92 (D)
Robert B. Reich CFR (D)
Brian Williams - CFR
In the News:
Haley Barbour CFR (D)
Eric Holder CFR (D)
Larry Summers CFR, BB
Janet Yellen CFR (D)
Chuck Hagel CFR (D)
Sylvia Burwell CFR/11 (D)
Jeh Johnson CFR (D)
Ashton Carter CFR/92 (D)
More Politicians:
Fred Thompson CFR (R)
Charles B. Rangel CFR (D)
Barney Frank CFR (D)
Richard Newton Gardner CFR/RS/TC/84
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (D) CFR/92
Sandra Day O'Connor (R) CFR/92
Robert S. Mcnamara CFR (D)
Warren Christopher CFR (D)
Madeleine Albright CFR (D)
Samuel Richard ("Sandy") Berger CFR/BB (R)
Michael Froman CFR (D)
Military
General David Petraeus CFR,
CIA Director Chuck Hagel CFR
International Bankers - James Wolfensohn Paul Wolfowitz, Alan Greenspan, Tim Geithner CFR,TC,BB
Michael V. Hayden CFR CIA/NSA
Mar 25, 2016 09:37:40 #
Bye Bye boys and girls:-)
Super Dave wrote:
And do what? Hide in a closet? V**e for a lunatic while thinking that my v**e doesn't count?
You stay in the closet. I'll live out here.
You stay in the closet. I'll live out here.
Mar 25, 2016 09:38:20 #
eagleye13 wrote:
If you expect me to be impressed with a list of names, you've mistaken me for someone else.A few more notables in Both Parties Serving Bilderbergers CFR/TC/BB AGENDA:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.