One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Ted Cruz: The Washington Dictatorship's Latest Manchurian Candidate
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 22, 2016 22:53:53   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ted Cruz: The Washington Dictatorship's Latest Manchurian Candidate
Tony Elliott — March 20, 2016

We already have a Manchurian Candidate in the White House whom we know nothing about personally, because he has had his personal records sealed. We know him as President Barack Hussein Obama and we know this name is not his birth name, we do not know where he was born, what schools he attended, or anything else about him personally. For all we know, he could be a plant by some clandestine arm of the US government or he could have been put into position via a foreign government or entity. The fact is, we know nothing about this man who is in the highest office of the land.

What we do know is every action made by him goes against the Constitution of our country, is detrimental to the citizens in every way, and he is committing treason on a daily basis.

Since Obama took office, the US has done a complete 180 degree turn from having a war on terrorism to supplying them with billions of dollars, billions in weapons and equipment, military training, food and supply drops in the guise of mistaken drops, and actual help on the battlefield. Obama has also t***sformed the country from what was left of our constitutional freedoms after the George W. Bush Administration's post 9-11 N**i laws into nothing more than a socialist dictatorship where we no longer have a two party government. Under the Obama regime, we are no longer represented by anyone in government but ruled over. This is currently seen in the efforts of Washington to keep Donald Trump from becoming president even though he is the choice of the people.

This brings us to the other candidate running for president, Ted Cruz, who has also had his personal records sealed as well.

What we do know about him, is he was born in Calgary Alberta, Canada with the name, Rafael Edward Cruz to parents Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, born in Cuba and Elanor Elizabeth (Darragh) Wilson, born in Wilmington, Delaware who lived in Canada for 3 years working in the oil business.

Ted Cruz's birth in Canada and his parents raise a red f**g as to his eligibility to be President of the United States. First, his father wouldn't qualify him to be a US citizen because he was a Canadian citizen at the time of his birth. Secondly, his mother's past is very cloudy at best, she was supposedly from Delaware, but there is no clear evidence she was. Simply add the fact that they were in Canada some 3 years prior to Cruz's birth and this brings up his eligibility to become president. On the basis that for foreign born children to US parents to be considered US citizens at least one parent who is a US citizen has to have been in the US one year prior to the child's birth. If the accounts of Cruz's parents are correct, his mother, being the parent who determined his US citizenship based on her being a US citizen, was not in the US a year prior to his birth as required by US law.

So, basically we have another candidate running for president who we really know nothing about personally who would take office under the name Ted Cruz which isn't his birth name as well as having very questionable US citizenship issues because of his mother's cloudy past and her time in Canada before his birth.

The bottom line is we do not need another mysterious individual in the White House whom we know nothing about his past. We have already had Obama for two terms who has managed to destroy everything great about this country and turn it into a Hell hole. We do not need another Manchurian Candidate to finish the job.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

Reply
Mar 22, 2016 23:22:15   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Ted Cruz: The Washington Dictatorship's Latest Manchurian Candidate
Tony Elliott — March 20, 2016

We already have a Manchurian Candidate in the White House whom we know nothing about personally, because he has had his personal records sealed. We know him as President Barack Hussein Obama and we know this name is not his birth name, we do not know where he was born, what schools he attended, or anything else about him personally. For all we know, he could be a plant by some clandestine arm of the US government or he could have been put into position via a foreign government or entity. The fact is, we know nothing about this man who is in the highest office of the land.

What we do know is every action made by him goes against the Constitution of our country, is detrimental to the citizens in every way, and he is committing treason on a daily basis.

Since Obama took office, the US has done a complete 180 degree turn from having a war on terrorism to supplying them with billions of dollars, billions in weapons and equipment, military training, food and supply drops in the guise of mistaken drops, and actual help on the battlefield. Obama has also t***sformed the country from what was left of our constitutional freedoms after the George W. Bush Administration's post 9-11 N**i laws into nothing more than a socialist dictatorship where we no longer have a two party government. Under the Obama regime, we are no longer represented by anyone in government but ruled over. This is currently seen in the efforts of Washington to keep Donald Trump from becoming president even though he is the choice of the people.

This brings us to the other candidate running for president, Ted Cruz, who has also had his personal records sealed as well.

What we do know about him, is he was born in Calgary Alberta, Canada with the name, Rafael Edward Cruz to parents Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, born in Cuba and Elanor Elizabeth (Darragh) Wilson, born in Wilmington, Delaware who lived in Canada for 3 years working in the oil business.

Ted Cruz's birth in Canada and his parents raise a red f**g as to his eligibility to be President of the United States. First, his father wouldn't qualify him to be a US citizen because he was a Canadian citizen at the time of his birth. Secondly, his mother's past is very cloudy at best, she was supposedly from Delaware, but there is no clear evidence she was. Simply add the fact that they were in Canada some 3 years prior to Cruz's birth and this brings up his eligibility to become president. On the basis that for foreign born children to US parents to be considered US citizens at least one parent who is a US citizen has to have been in the US one year prior to the child's birth. If the accounts of Cruz's parents are correct, his mother, being the parent who determined his US citizenship based on her being a US citizen, was not in the US a year prior to his birth as required by US law.

So, basically we have another candidate running for president who we really know nothing about personally who would take office under the name Ted Cruz which isn't his birth name as well as having very questionable US citizenship issues because of his mother's cloudy past and her time in Canada before his birth.

The bottom line is we do not need another mysterious individual in the White House whom we know nothing about his past. We have already had Obama for two terms who has managed to destroy everything great about this country and turn it into a Hell hole. We do not need another Manchurian Candidate to finish the job.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.
Ted Cruz: The Washington Dictatorship's Latest Man... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 03:42:24   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Ted Cruz: The Washington Dictatorship's Latest Manchurian Candidate
Tony Elliott — March 20, 2016

We already have a Manchurian Candidate in the White House whom we know nothing about personally, because he has had his personal records sealed. We know him as President Barack Hussein Obama and we know this name is not his birth name, we do not know where he was born, what schools he attended, or anything else about him personally. For all we know, he could be a plant by some clandestine arm of the US government or he could have been put into position via a foreign government or entity. The fact is, we know nothing about this man who is in the highest office of the land.

What we do know is every action made by him goes against the Constitution of our country, is detrimental to the citizens in every way, and he is committing treason on a daily basis.

Since Obama took office, the US has done a complete 180 degree turn from having a war on terrorism to supplying them with billions of dollars, billions in weapons and equipment, military training, food and supply drops in the guise of mistaken drops, and actual help on the battlefield. Obama has also t***sformed the country from what was left of our constitutional freedoms after the George W. Bush Administration's post 9-11 N**i laws into nothing more than a socialist dictatorship where we no longer have a two party government. Under the Obama regime, we are no longer represented by anyone in government but ruled over. This is currently seen in the efforts of Washington to keep Donald Trump from becoming president even though he is the choice of the people.

This brings us to the other candidate running for president, Ted Cruz, who has also had his personal records sealed as well.

What we do know about him, is he was born in Calgary Alberta, Canada with the name, Rafael Edward Cruz to parents Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, born in Cuba and Elanor Elizabeth (Darragh) Wilson, born in Wilmington, Delaware who lived in Canada for 3 years working in the oil business.

Ted Cruz's birth in Canada and his parents raise a red f**g as to his eligibility to be President of the United States. First, his father wouldn't qualify him to be a US citizen because he was a Canadian citizen at the time of his birth. Secondly, his mother's past is very cloudy at best, she was supposedly from Delaware, but there is no clear evidence she was. Simply add the fact that they were in Canada some 3 years prior to Cruz's birth and this brings up his eligibility to become president. On the basis that for foreign born children to US parents to be considered US citizens at least one parent who is a US citizen has to have been in the US one year prior to the child's birth. If the accounts of Cruz's parents are correct, his mother, being the parent who determined his US citizenship based on her being a US citizen, was not in the US a year prior to his birth as required by US law.

So, basically we have another candidate running for president who we really know nothing about personally who would take office under the name Ted Cruz which isn't his birth name as well as having very questionable US citizenship issues because of his mother's cloudy past and her time in Canada before his birth.

The bottom line is we do not need another mysterious individual in the White House whom we know nothing about his past. We have already had Obama for two terms who has managed to destroy everything great about this country and turn it into a Hell hole. We do not need another Manchurian Candidate to finish the job.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.
Ted Cruz: The Washington Dictatorship's Latest Man... (show quote)


Rather than like a site that posts drivel, why not look up 8 USC section 1401 which deals with Ted Cruz's situation? The information you posted is erroneous.
Cruz senior was NOT a Canadian citizen at the time of Ted Cruz's birth. He was Cuban.
Cruz's mother was born in Delaware. I posted a copy of her birth certificate. She was a US citizen in Canada on a work permit when Cruz was born.
In 1970, Canadian Law required four years as a permanent Canadian resident for citizenship. There is no record of Ms. Cruz ever applying for Permanent Resident status, and she had not been there long enough to do so when Cruz was born.
The only way for a natural born citizen such as Mrs. Cruz to lose her US citizenship is by voluntary renunciation. There would be records of this in both the US and Canada, had it ever happened. There are none.
There is no Certificate of Naturalization for Mrs. Cruz, which Canadian law requires. If you are a naturalized Canadian, you have a certificate. No paper, no citizen, no exceptions.
For those who say that Canadian Law did not allow dual US citizenship for children born to non-Canadians legally and temporarily in Canada, this is bulls**t. They base their claim on the Canadian Citizenship Law of 1947. Unlike these claimants, I have read the law. All of it. There is not one word about a prohibition of dual citizenship for a case like Cruz. There is one that applies to Canadians born to Canadian parents, in some circumstances, none of which apply.
8USC section 1401 is not very long or complicated. Read it. Under the provisions of this 1952 law, Cruz is a US citizen from birth, requiring no naturalization proceedings other than being live born. One US citizen parent is all that is required.
For those of you who quote Minor v Happersatt which states that born in the US to 2 citizen parents constitutes natural born, it states nowhere that this is the only way in which the criteria may be met. In US v Wong Kim Ark, which was adjudicated 23 years after Happersatt, the court held that "citizen by birth," and "natural born" were the same thing.
On the matter of Ted Cruz having his personal records sealed; I found his birth certificate in less than 5 minutes, same for his mothers. Where he was born, where he went to school, what he did for a living.
Ted Cruz was Solicitor General of the State of Texas. He was an Assistant United States District Attorney for the DOJ, and a law clerk for the chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. He has been admitted to the Supreme Court bar where he won 6 of the 9 cases he argued.
Do you ACTUALLY think he did all of this in a vaccuum, with his personal history sealed up?
This is what happens when you believe fringe sites instead of doing your own research. Does anyone still want to like this site that publishes half-t***hs and outright lies?

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2016 08:03:49   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Loki wrote:
Rather than like a site that posts drivel, why not look up 8 USC section 1401 which deals with Ted Cruz's situation?


Nutbags are just like religious zealots. Facts are less important than faith.

Nutbags have faith that the laws of reality don't matter if you watch enough episodes of X-Files.

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 08:53:10   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
I do not care much about Cruz's birth right; only if it can it be used against him later by the Demons.
It is his Texas back ground working for Bush and other fellow CFR members. Then there is Goldman Sach's loans, and the lying about Trump's positions.
I do not trust CFR members. I have seen the damage done by these NWO pushers in both parties for decades.



Loki wrote:
Rather than like a site that posts drivel, why not look up 8 USC section 1401 which deals with Ted Cruz's situation? The information you posted is erroneous.
Cruz senior was NOT a Canadian citizen at the time of Ted Cruz's birth. He was Cuban.
Cruz's mother was born in Delaware. I posted a copy of her birth certificate. She was a US citizen in Canada on a work permit when Cruz was born.
In 1970, Canadian Law required four years as a permanent Canadian resident for citizenship. There is no record of Ms. Cruz ever applying for Permanent Resident status, and she had not been there long enough to do so when Cruz was born.
The only way for a natural born citizen such as Mrs. Cruz to lose her US citizenship is by voluntary renunciation. There would be records of this in both the US and Canada, had it ever happened. There are none.
There is no Certificate of Naturalization for Mrs. Cruz, which Canadian law requires. If you are a naturalized Canadian, you have a certificate. No paper, no citizen, no exceptions.
For those who say that Canadian Law did not allow dual US citizenship for children born to non-Canadians legally and temporarily in Canada, this is bulls**t. They base their claim on the Canadian Citizenship Law of 1947. Unlike these claimants, I have read the law. All of it. There is not one word about a prohibition of dual citizenship for a case like Cruz. There is one that applies to Canadians born to Canadian parents, in some circumstances, none of which apply.
8USC section 1401 is not very long or complicated. Read it. Under the provisions of this 1952 law, Cruz is a US citizen from birth, requiring no naturalization proceedings other than being live born. One US citizen parent is all that is required.
For those of you who quote Minor v Happersatt which states that born in the US to 2 citizen parents constitutes natural born, it states nowhere that this is the only way in which the criteria may be met. In US v Wong Kim Ark, which was adjudicated 23 years after Happersatt, the court held that "citizen by birth," and "natural born" were the same thing.
On the matter of Ted Cruz having his personal records sealed; I found his birth certificate in less than 5 minutes, same for his mothers. Where he was born, where he went to school, what he did for a living.
Ted Cruz was Solicitor General of the State of Texas. He was an Assistant United States District Attorney for the DOJ, and a law clerk for the chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. He has been admitted to the Supreme Court bar where he won 6 of the 9 cases he argued.
Do you ACTUALLY think he did all of this in a vaccuum, with his personal history sealed up?
This is what happens when you believe fringe sites instead of doing your own research. Does anyone still want to like this site that publishes half-t***hs and outright lies?
Rather than like a site that posts drivel, why not... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 16:04:05   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
eagleye13 wrote:
I do not care much about Cruz's birth right; only if it can it be used against him later by the Demons.
It is his Texas back ground working for Bush and other fellow CFR members. Then there is Goldman Sach's loans, and the lying about Trump's positions.
I do not trust CFR members. I have seen the damage done by these NWO pushers in both parties for decades.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 17:05:32   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Hemiman wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


Some more food For Thought:

The NeoCONs got us in this mess in the Middle East. The CFR controls foreign policy by controlling both political parties.
The videos below are just a few of many exposing the treachery of some politicians, and those they serve.
Who wonders why CIA funded ISIS in Syria? Why did CONgress add another $500 million in funding "insurgents" in Syria?
Covert Origins of ISIS: These videos get to the root of ISIS, and US foreign policy. They should be copied and shared with all.
http://youtu.be/oMjXbuj7BPI
General Wesley Clark explains ISIS was created by U.S. Allies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojcoKnTGf4s


Israel Lobbyist in US: We Need a False F**g to Start War with Iran
http://youtu.be/Se32h**eIvw
Disturbing News: President Obama Asks Congress for $500 Million TO FUND ISIS!
http://youtu.be/cLQVVhfzT20
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oidaJHwZZgs

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2016 17:47:39   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Hemiman wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


Ted Cruz is not and never has been a CFR member. His wife was a provisional temporary member who resigned. Like it or not, advancement past a certain point in finance or politics pretty much requires membership in the CFR or the Trilateral Commission, whether you agree with them or not. Ron Paul couldn't get elected dogcatcher until he switched from Libertarian to Republican. He did not change his beliefs, he just found a viable platform for them. He disagreed with the Republicans on many issues, but had to be a member to get elected.
Heidi Cruz seems to be much the same. At any rate, her temporary involvement was peripheral, and her husband has denounced the CFR as anti-American and hostile to US sovereignty.

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 17:54:34   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Just keep believing that.
"provisional temporary member" of the CFR? Who are you trying to kid? Yourself?

Loki wrote:
Ted Cruz is not and never has been a CFR member. His wife was a provisional temporary member who resigned. Like it or not, advancement past a certain point in finance or politics pretty much requires membership in the CFR or the Trilateral Commission, whether you agree with them or not. Ron Paul couldn't get elected dogcatcher until he switched from Libertarian to Republican. He did not change his beliefs, he just found a viable platform for them. He disagreed with the Republicans on many issues, but had to be a member to get elected.
Heidi Cruz seems to be much the same. At any rate, her temporary involvement was peripheral, and her husband has denounced the CFR as anti-American and hostile to US sovereignty.
Ted Cruz is not and never has been a CFR member. H... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 17:58:43   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Just keep believing that.
"provisional temporary member" of the CFR? Who are you trying to kid? Yourself?


Provisional members have a five year membership. It may or may not be renewed. Ms. Cruz resigned before her temporary (5 year provisional ) membership was done.

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 18:43:47   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
eagleye13 wrote:
I do not care much about Cruz's birth right; only if it can it be used against him later by the Demons.
It is his Texas back ground working for Bush and other fellow CFR members. Then there is Goldman Sach's loans, and the lying about Trump's positions.
I do not trust CFR members. I have seen the damage done by these NWO pushers in both parties for decades.


I understand your concerns as well but will also say Cruz does have an impeccable background as well as some questions about his "work for Bush and his wife's affiliations"..

"As Solicitor General for the State of Texas and in private practice, Ted authored more than 80 U.S. Supreme Court briefs and argued 43 oral arguments, including nine before the U.S. Supreme Court, and has won an unprecedented series of landmark national victories including defending U.S. sovereignty against the UN and the World Court in Medellin v. Texas, defending our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, defending the constitutionality of the Ten Commandments monument at the Texas State Capitol and the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance.

In the U.S. Senate, Ted has led the fight to repeal Obamacare, to stop President Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional executive amnesty, and to defend life, marriage, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, and our entire Bill of Rights. And most important, he’s kept his promise to speak the t***h and do what he said he’d do...

At least he doesn't back down from either side and speaks his piece as well..For these reasons while Trump is my first choice, I will support and v**e for Cruz if it comes down to him..Of course the RNC/GOP don't want him either so the brokered convention will take place and the GOP will have imploded itself...They own this one eagle..

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2016 20:53:49   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
lindajoy wrote:
I understand your concerns as well but will also say Cruz does have an impeccable background as well as some questions about his "work for Bush and his wife's affiliations"..

"As Solicitor General for the State of Texas and in private practice, Ted authored more than 80 U.S. Supreme Court briefs and argued 43 oral arguments, including nine before the U.S. Supreme Court, and has won an unprecedented series of landmark national victories including defending U.S. sovereignty against the UN and the World Court in Medellin v. Texas, defending our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, defending the constitutionality of the Ten Commandments monument at the Texas State Capitol and the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance.

In the U.S. Senate, Ted has led the fight to repeal Obamacare, to stop President Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional executive amnesty, and to defend life, marriage, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, and our entire Bill of Rights. And most important, he’s kept his promise to speak the t***h and do what he said he’d do...

At least he doesn't back down from either side and speaks his piece as well..For these reasons while Trump is my first choice, I will support and v**e for Cruz if it comes down to him..Of course the RNC/GOP don't want him either so the brokered convention will take place and the GOP will have imploded itself...They own this one eagle..
I understand your concerns as well but will also s... (show quote)
A brokered convention in and of itself may not be a bad thing.

Trump doesn't get 50%+1 delegates, by rules it is a certainty.

All that means is that the delegates may be swayed away from their candidate and join another candidate. If Trump is way ahead and can't sway just a few delegates, then his deal-making abilities may be overstated.

Some Trumpsters (and I think Trump) have implied that the RNC should make a special rule so that Trump, unlike any previous candidate, can win without a majority of delegates. If the RNC does that, then the GOP will cease to exist.

If the RNC installs some stupid rule that makes it impossible for Trump to succeed or fail based on his own personal abilities and the way he's run his campaign, then the GOP will cease to exist.

But if the RNC allows Trump, Cruz and Kasich to all try to convince enough delegates to follow him and give him a majority of the delegates, then the winner wins fair and square.

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 21:38:32   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Loki wrote:
Provisional members have a five year membership. It may or may not be renewed. Ms. Cruz resigned before her temporary (5 year provisional ) membership was done.


A political move maybe?
How about the Bushes and Goldman Sachs associations?

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 22:52:09   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
eagleye13 wrote:
A political move maybe?
How about the Bushes and Goldman Sachs associations?


Cruz went against the Bush Administration in one of his Supreme Court cases. He argued and won that Texas had the right to execute wetback murderers.

Reply
Mar 23, 2016 23:48:45   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Loki wrote:
Cruz went against the Bush Administration in one of his Supreme Court cases. He argued and won that Texas had the right to execute wetback murderers.

Typical cover tactic for an undercover neocon establishment type.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.