One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
New low for the Right or was I blinded by the chance of Concensus?
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
Oct 12, 2013 13:58:00   #
Homestead
 
maelstrom wrote:
That's because it is the mostly the right that speaks of s******n and breaking the states up.


Yea, that's right, the left doesn't want to break up the states.
It just wants to throw out the Constitution and the bill of rights and create a c*******t country.

Yuri Bezmenov (former kgb) Psychological Warfare Subversion & Control of Western Society - Complete
http://www.the912project.us/forum/topics/c*******t-goals-1963-how-many?commentId=2881797%3AComment%3A2711721&xg_source=msg_com_forum

Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35
January 10, 1963 Current C*******t Goals
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/c*******m/comgoals.htm

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 14:02:44   #
joe1941
 
maelstrom wrote:
That's because it is the mostly the right that speaks of s******n and breaking the states up.


Did you use to write for the cartoon section of the newspapers?

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 14:07:02   #
Artemis
 
Homestead wrote:
We understand:

All we have to do is agree with you and not demand that you support your position and you'll be happy.

As long as we do as you say, then all will be well.

As long as we don't have any different ideas than you, they'll be no conflict.


Sorry but the ones who insist on every one being cardboard cutouts are from the right. For example, wanting everyone to be Christian, everyone to be white (but that doesn't include most w****s only WASPS) Wants everyone to be heterosexual, even though homosexuality is a physical imbalance, not choice, I can go on. The Dems are not the ones who don't welcome new ideas. maybe your on the wrong side, because your all mixed up.

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2013 14:40:45   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
maelstrom wrote:
That's because it is the mostly the right that speaks of s******n and breaking the states up.


Civil disobedience is not s******n, and I believe secession from a state is a constitutional right - sorta like redistricting.

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 15:31:56   #
Homestead
 
maelstrom wrote:
Sorry but the ones who insist on every one being cardboard cutouts are from the right. For example, wanting everyone to be Christian, everyone to be white (but that doesn't include most w****s only WASPS) Wants everyone to be heterosexual, even though homosexuality is a physical imbalance, not choice, I can go on. The Dems are not the ones who don't welcome new ideas. maybe your on the wrong side, because your all mixed up.


Again, your full of sh*t. It is Islam that says that there is no God But Allah and that Islam is the only true religion and therefore all must submit or die.

And it is the democrats that embrace Islam.

No one is telling you to become Christian or die.

C*******m is not a new idea and neither is F*****m or dictatorships.

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 17:22:27   #
rumitoid
 
BigMike wrote:
You end the second paragraph of your post with "come together - right now!" and follow it with a blanket condemnation of the right. Make up your mind. :|


BM, It does seem that way and for that my amends but I meant to refer it back to the particular threads I commented on.

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 17:24:23   #
rumitoid
 
Homestead wrote:
Speaking of facts..................where are yours?????????????


I am referring to threads on this site; therein the facts.

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2013 17:27:37   #
rumitoid
 
Homestead wrote:
We understand:

All we have to do is agree with you and not demand that you support your position and you'll be happy.

As long as we do as you say, then all will be well.

As long as we don't have any different ideas than you, they'll be no conflict.


That is not true of me; is it true of you?

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 17:45:14   #
Mr Shako Loc: Colo Spgs
 
The "Meddling pot?"

"How many died in the Civil War? And you wonder why liberals look for some gun control?"

Huh??

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 17:50:15   #
Homestead
 
rumitoid wrote:
I am referring to threads on this site; therein the facts.


Then state the threads or the facts.

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 17:53:32   #
rumitoid
 
BigMike wrote:
Civil disobedience is not s******n, and I believe secession from a state is a constitutional right - sorta like redistricting.


The states do not have the right to secede.

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2013 17:54:11   #
rumitoid
 
Homestead wrote:
Then state the threads or the facts.


I did. the one assasination and the one of reforming the states.

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 18:33:37   #
Homestead
 
rumitoid wrote:
I did. the one assasination and the one of reforming the states.


Ok, what assassination and what about it.

If everyone agreed to the reforming of a state then that state could reform, however unlikely that may be.

Our forefathers made their opinion on secession, quite clear, in the Declaration of Independence, of the United States.
***************************************************************
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
****************************************************************

It might take blood shed, as did the revolution, But, if the federal government got out of hand, then that is exactly what would happen and our forefathers made sure, with the second amendment, that we would have the means to do so if needed.

We haven't got that far yet, so don't worry about it.

The talk of secession is to try and communicate the displeasure the American people have with a government that no longer listens to them.

The other thing is, that states have realized that they are to dependant on the federal government, so individual states talking about secession are looking to see how they can reduce their dependency on the federal government. They can do that without actually seceding.

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 18:50:31   #
Artemis
 
BigMike wrote:
Civil disobedience is not s******n, and I believe secession from a state is a constitutional right - sorta like redistricting.


I wasn't speaking of civil disobedience, I was referring to a treasonous attitude. I did also refer to people breaking up the states and yes that is not illegal it is secession but that will dissolve our country.
I was referring to some posts I've read where there was a map and predictions of cutting up the country. We might be in a fix right now, but I will always be for keeping our country in tact and united. I'm sorry but I'm not sure which post of mine your referring to.

Reply
Oct 12, 2013 18:57:19   #
Homestead
 
maelstrom wrote:
I wasn't speaking of civil disobedience,I was referring to some posts I've read where there was a map and predictions of cutting up the country. We might be in a fix right now, but I will always be for keeping our country in tact and united.


That's true, but, you don't want the other side to know that.
You want them to know that you are as serious as a heart attack and the injustices being fostered on you will not stand and that you will do wh**ever is necessary to deal with it.
In the meantime there are those who are standing on the side lines, doing nothing. If they think that something radical might happen if they don't get involved, then you know what, they just might get involed and solve the problems their creating by standing on the side lines.

This is a country, of the people, by the people, for the people, it has no room for apathy.
Self government doesn't work if the people won't self govern, freedom ain't free!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.