Teatards have lost (Page 2): Just what 'principles' are you gushing about? Besides the a******l fear of the federal government, what do teatards want? Seems that most of the yapping...

BoJester

Just what 'principles' are you gushing about? Besides the a******l fear of the federal government, what do teatards want? Seems that most of the yapping and whining about 'big government is merely shifting responsibilty and costs for programs to the states. So state government gets bigger, and taxes have to rise to cover the increased costs. Pure teatard genius.
And what is the benefit of being an American citizen, if individual states can restrict, or limit an individual's rights, but in time of war, states do not provide for 'national defense. More teatard genius ideas.

SchoonerPete wrote:

You sir, are so wrong. I don't know what kind of ... (show quote)

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

BoJester wrote:

Just what 'principles' are you gushing about? Bes... (show quote)

and that is as it should be the federal has it's nose in too much if liberals could read I would suggest they read the constitution

thatduck83 Loc: Oklahoma City

Teatards. Insult to good American R****ds. We're so far in front of them they're so stupid they think they're in front.

BoJester

If teatards could READ AND COMPREHEND, they would realize the concepts set forth in the constitution, regarding personal liberty, freedom of the press, speech, and religion, e******y and the right to due process under the law, are the tenets of LIBERALISM.

alex wrote:

and that is as it should be the federal has it's nose in too much if liberals could read I would suggest they read the constitution

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

BoJester wrote:

If teatards could READ AND COMPREHEND, they would realize the concepts set forth in the constitution, regarding personal liberty, freedom of the press, speech, and religion, e******y and the right to due process under the law, are the tenets of LIBERALISM.

if that was true they would follow them

BoJester

You are right about that, since teatards want to pick and chose who is equal, what speech is allowable, what religion is proper, and who is excluded by some arbitrary teatard/teabag/conservative definition who who a citizen should be.

alex wrote:

if that was true they would follow them

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

BoJester wrote:

You are right about that, since teatards want to pick and chose who is equal, what speech is allowable, what religion is proper, and who is excluded by some arbitrary teatard/teabag/conservative definition who who a citizen should be.

my dad always told me to not argue with i***ts so you just have it your own way even if you are wrong

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

BoJester wrote:

If teatards could READ AND COMPREHEND, they would realize the concepts set forth in the constitution, regarding personal liberty, freedom of the press, speech, and religion, e******y and the right to due process under the law, are the tenets of LIBERALISM.

Un huh! Chalk this one up to an overdose of koolaid.

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Guess who.

It may be affirmed, on the best grounds, that no small share of the present embarrassments of America is to be charged on the blunders of our governments; and that these have proceeded from the heads rather than the hearts of most of the authors of them. What indeed are all the repealing, explaining, and amending laws, which fill and disgrace our voluminous codes, but so many monuments of deficient wisdom?
The author of the Constitution

thatduck83 Loc: Oklahoma City

alex wrote:

my dad always told me to not argue with i***ts so you just have it your own way even if you are wrong

Doesn't that make you wonder why people aren't arguing with you. It seems to me you explained it very well.

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

there are no intelligent people argueing with me

thatduck83 wrote:

Doesn't that make you wonder why people aren't arguing with you. It seems to me you explained it very well.

BoJester

Intelligent people do not need to argue with i***ts, therefore, you are free to answer your posts yourself. Have you noticed that even other teatards don't reply to you? It might just be a clue.

alex wrote:

there are no intelligent people argueing with me

saloopo Loc: Colorado

alex wrote:

my dad always told me to not argue with i***ts so you just have it your own way even if you are wrong[/quote

This is the quack ducks introduction to this site.
[quote=thatduck83]I LOVE ME

There is no argument or debate with those who exhibit clinical Narcissistic personality disorder. They have a sense of entitlement while exhibiting grandiosity in their beliefs and behavior, perceiving themselves above debate. The narcissist knows all, at least in his own mind. The psychological disorder is especially destructive when the narcissist also happens to be an ASS HAT. This is probably the reason hes been divorced four times and now lives alone in BoJesters basement.

BoJester

Speaking of delusional thoughts, you are a winner once again.

saloopo wrote:

There is no argument or debate with those who exhibit clinical Narcissistic personality disorder. They have a sense of entitlement while exhibiting grandiosity in their beliefs and behavior, perceiving themselves above debate. The narcissist knows all, at least in his own mind. The psychological disorder is especially destructive when the narcissist also happens to be an ASS HAT. This is probably the reason hes been divorced four times and now lives alone in BoJesters basement.

saloopo Loc: Colorado

BoJester wrote:

Speaking of delusional thoughts, you are a winner once again.

Coming from you? All I can say is, thanks for the compliment.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

SchoonerPete wrote:

You sir, are so wrong. I don't know what kind of ... (show quote)

The Tea party is great at talking points. The problem, as Bo has pointed out is your deeds are far different than your words..You insist only you can defend the Constitution but only as you define it. If the process does not gain what you are seeking, you violate those stated values in a heartbeat..In order to limit this post, what is it you find so revolting about providing health care for people who have been denied coverage, or been limited by lifetime costs. The ACA is far from perfect and hopefully will be amended, reinforced and corrected. Let it be put into practice and many of us will work to that end.. One last thought, if someone can think of any way for the Republicans to save face, this shut down will end. The money hounds of wall St. have started a recovery for themselves...