One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why do Obama and Holder get by with the things they do?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 6, 2013 00:43:54   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Quizzal wrote:
oldroy - Probably a combination of every race. I believe that our government would attack anyone who disagrees with their ideas.


When will they come after me because I talk so much against Obama and his government? I don't know but fully expect to see the black vehicles or helicopters looking at my house.

Reply
Oct 6, 2013 02:39:31   #
Quizzal Loc: TN
 
oldroy - I hope and pray that they never come after you and that your freedom of speech may always continue. I, myself, am just someone that no one is this world would care if I come or go. Which, I will probably go before our crazy government fixes anything. If they do come, no one will ever know anyway. I had a good laugh anyway. Thank you.

Reply
Oct 6, 2013 09:23:21   #
Thinkmanvt
 
oldroy wrote:
Left leaners continually call me r****t because I don't agree with many things that Obama does. The media constantly attacks politicians who don't side with him and r****t is their most normal attack word.

I think you have failed to see that nobody would be as much against Obama as I am just for race. It is the corruption and just plain gangsterism that has come with him that I don't like. It has nothing to do with his race other than the fact that he and Holder do exhibit lots of r****m like in the Philadelphia NBP actions at polling places in 2010
Left leaners continually call me r****t because I ... (show quote)


Well, personally, I do not fail to see that. I thought that was basically what I was saying. But you are correct that I substituted "Democrat" for black" and not "gangster". There is a lot of talk of corruption, treason, and evil intent amongst many posters here that I admit was news to me when I started reading here about 5 weeks ago. Prior to that, my experience was that people disliked (and strongly h**ed and feared) the Obama administration policies. To me (before then), the grasping at any excuse (birther, IRS, NSA, State Dept) to criticize seemed to be more tactical ways to weaken his image for political purpose that had existed long before these particular scandals came to light.

The impeachment of Clinton seemed (to me) to arise from the same political drive to gain advantage, but I always had trouble seeing any treason in his actions (and at most saw "low" crimes and misdemeanors common amongst politicians). I would suspect there were Democrats who thought impeaching GWBush was necessary although I do not remember at such specific discussion. Outside of this forum, I have never heard a Republican politician (or radio jockey, but I seldom hear anything from them unless the media (or Comedy Channel) picks it up) call for impeachment of Obama. But even the apparent hyperbole here that characterizes Obama as criminal, t*****rous, and downright evil has not struck me as being based on his race nor the race (versus laziness/wh**ever) of people whom his policies favor. Perhaps some politicians might feel they need to avoid the "r****t charge", but it seems to be completely ineffective here in silencing anyone. It is a rather stupid argument to throw against some poster of opposing viewpoint -- even if true, it is not the substance of their statement except in a few cases (such as when they elect to characterize the President as a r****t because he says something that acknowledges that race and r****m still exist in this country).

Reply
 
 
Oct 6, 2013 09:46:22   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
R****t is applied wrong today. Very few dislike all from another race, to disagree with anyone wh**ever their there race is not r****t. The liberals have used this against the right since I was a kid and the media has joined them.


oldroy wrote:
Left leaners continually call me r****t because I don't agree with many things that Obama does. The media constantly attacks politicians who don't side with him and r****t is their most normal attack word.

I think you have failed to see that nobody would be as much against Obama as I am just for race. It is the corruption and just plain gangsterism that has come with him that I don't like. It has nothing to do with his race other than the fact that he and Holder do exhibit lots of r****m like in the Philadelphia NBP actions at polling places in 2010
Left leaners continually call me r****t because I ... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 6, 2013 10:05:48   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
bmac32 wrote:
R****t is applied wrong today. Very few dislike all from another race, to disagree with anyone wh**ever their there race is not r****t. The liberals have used this against the right since I was a kid and the media has joined them.


You just don't get it. You have to like ALL b****s, and believe them incapable of ANY wrongdoing, to avoid the designation.

Reply
Oct 6, 2013 10:12:54   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
That's never gonna happen, I don't even like all w****s!


banjojack wrote:
You just don't get it. You have to like ALL b****s, and believe them incapable of ANY wrongdoing, to avoid the designation.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.