One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is Bush still responsible for the present scandals and harships?
Page <<first <prev 11 of 12 next>
Sep 25, 2013 12:59:32   #
mohadib
 
oldroy wrote:
Has I Won made any differences in gun control? He has tried very hard but what has he accomplished?

Has he even addressed the fact that all those who have used guns to k**l were mentally disturbed and would have k**led some other way if they didn't have guns?

Has he even tried to convince people like Piers Morgan that all guns aren't assault weapons?




First of all who cares about piers morgan?


"All those that have used guns to k**l were mentally disturbed"

And you know this how?

Republicans have nothing to do with blocking any attempt at gun control? It's Obama not caring Right?

Well you didn't answer my questions, you just Parroted wing nut talking points.Can you back up any of your claims with Facts?

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 13:09:18   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
oldroy wrote:
Has I Won made any differences in gun control? He has tried very hard but what has he accomplished?

Has he even addressed the fact that all those who have used guns to k**l were mentally disturbed and would have k**led some other way if they didn't have guns?

Has he even tried to convince people like Piers Morgan that all guns aren't assault weapons?


Right on Oldroy - but they want admit that all the menatally disturbed were Demograts

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 13:13:53   #
GaryMickel1955
 
mohadib wrote:
First of all who cares about piers morgan?


"All those that have used guns to k**l were mentally disturbed"

And you know this how?

Republicans have nothing to do with blocking any attempt at gun control? It's Obama not caring Right?

Well you didn't answer my questions, you just Parroted wing nut talking points.Can you back up any of your claims with Facts?


There is no way this crazy fool can take away the second amendment people that own guns will die before they let them go and if he tries this how many more amendments will he attempt to repeal or abolish so he can be the first dictoator of this country that will be known then as th American Socialist Republic of America instead of the USA of course we are nothing like the framers of the constitution designed us to be anyway the politicians have already broken enough of the constitution that it is meaningless a written. As You can tell I am not Republican or Democrat or independent I am a constitutionalist and we need to get this country back to where it started asap.

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2013 15:39:36   #
petertimber
 
GaryMickel1955 wrote:
There is no way this crazy fool can take away the second amendment people that own guns will die before they let them go and if he tries this how many more amendments will he attempt to repeal or abolish so he can be the first dictoator of this country that will be known then as th American Socialist Republic of America instead of the USA of course we are nothing like the framers of the constitution designed us to be anyway the politicians have already broken enough of the constitution that it is meaningless a written. As You can tell I am not Republican or Democrat or independent I am a constitutionalist and we need to get this country back to where it started asap.
There is no way this crazy fool can take away the ... (show quote)



The night before last late night radio broadcast that they were receiving (WABC) telephone calls from the USA/Mexico border that trucks were crossing from Mexico into the USA bearfing signs as freight reading MARTIAL-LAW....nothing was further mentioned by any pundit about this fearsome development

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 19:46:50   #
GaryMickel1955
 
petertimber wrote:
The night before last late night radio broadcast that they were receiving (WABC) telephone calls from the USA/Mexico border that trucks were crossing from Mexico into the USA bearfing signs as freight reading MARTIAL-LAW....nothing was further mentioned by any pundit about this fearsome development


That is what is coming our way then do we just it and let it happen?

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 19:55:42   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
mohadib wrote:
First of all who cares about piers morgan?


"All those that have used guns to k**l were mentally disturbed"

And you know this how?

Republicans have nothing to do with blocking any attempt at gun control? It's Obama not caring Right?

Well you didn't answer my questions, you just Parroted wing nut talking points.Can you back up any of your claims with Facts?


Are you saying that you just don't pay a lot of attention to what the media says about all those shooters? I guess you are.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 20:07:30   #
GaryMickel1955
 
oldroy wrote:
Are you saying that you just don't pay a lot of attention to what the media says about all those shooters? I guess you are.


If you cannot see the guy at the Navy Yard was mentally disturbed your blind and Hasan even told his upper rakning officers it was his duty to k**l for his chosen nation and that is not America it is Al-Quada Terrorists he would k**l anyone going over there to k**l the terrorist yet they did nothing to stop him. Even the Sandy Creek School incident that guy had shown he did not need a gun in his hands yet there he was with one k*****g children. Most Gun owners are not violent they use the guns to hunt or just sit in the house for home protection.

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2013 20:13:58   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
GaryMickel1955 wrote:
If you cannot see the guy at the Navy Yard was mentally disturbed your blind and Hasan even told his upper rakning officers it was his duty to k**l for his chosen nation and that is not America it is Al-Quada Terrorists he would k**l anyone going over there to k**l the terrorist yet they did nothing to stop him. Even the Sandy Creek School incident that guy had shown he did not need a gun in his hands yet there he was with one k*****g children. Most Gun owners are not violent they use the guns to hunt or just sit in the house for home protection.
If you cannot see the guy at the Navy Yard was men... (show quote)


I am going to say that you failed to read my words and see the post they were aimed at. Nothing uncommon but I wish it didn't happen.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 20:21:26   #
vernon
 
oldroy wrote:
THEY really don't seem to know a lot about Clinton especially that part about the surplus. I think they have no idea that that surplus was almost exactly the same amount as what was spent as Social Security surplus. The Congress forced balancing of the budget on him and he took credit for it.

THEY really have no idea about what sexual case he was impeached for since THEY always bring in Monica when talking about that impeachment and it was the Paula Jones case that he lied in court, under oath about.

THEY, just can't see anything he did that wasn't so good because THEY don't want to see those things.
THEY really don't seem to know a lot about Clinton... (show quote)


he wouldent release his med recorde either i wondered if he had an std

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 20:50:46   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
vernon wrote:
he wouldent release his med recorde either i wondered if he had an std


I never thought about that one. It is very possible and this is probably the main reason the Pres doesn't have to be in Obamacare. Can't have them knowing about stds.

Reply
Sep 26, 2013 09:02:54   #
mohadib
 
oldroy wrote:
Are you saying that you just don't pay a lot of attention to what the media says about all those shooters? I guess you are.



Oldroy I guess I'm saying, take initial reports by the media with a little skepticism. After the very unprofessional initial coverage of the Boston bombing, where it was one network trying to outdo the others with reports that I would label shrill.

Reply
 
 
Sep 26, 2013 09:47:23   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
JUst look at the Martin case, reported by one as white on black, then picked up by the others as the same. Looked the pictures finally, white on black, where's the white guy. Navy yard shooting, AR-15? really?



mohadib wrote:
Oldroy I guess I'm saying, take initial reports by the media with a little skepticism. After the very unprofessional initial coverage of the Boston bombing, where it was one network trying to outdo the others with reports that I would label shrill.

Reply
Sep 26, 2013 13:14:25   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
mohadib wrote:
Oldroy I guess I'm saying, take initial reports by the media with a little skepticism. After the very unprofessional initial coverage of the Boston bombing, where it was one network trying to outdo the others with reports that I would label shrill.


Shrill? Regarding that circus, you got the first two letters right.

Reply
Sep 26, 2013 13:53:13   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
Concerning the media's lack of professionalism; concerning the AR-15. Most of the media buffoons think the AR stands for assault rifle! A company (Arma-Lite) won a shoot-off in 1957 during the Army's quest to replace the M-14. Financial problems forced them to sell the product to Colt. Again the AR stands for the original company's name. I just went out and bought one - figuring one more in the good guy court is much better than the bad guy court. Go figure!

Reply
Sep 26, 2013 14:14:10   #
mohadib
 
banjojack wrote:
Shrill? Regarding that circus, you got the first two letters right.



Shrill describes the reporting of the "On scene reporters".


The word you mentioned describes the overall coverage.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 12 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.