I knew exactly what we were doing in B******i
Oct 30, 2015 13:08:10 #
MarvinSussman wrote:
Average force of impulse = 1/2 x (upper floors mass)/(distance force is applied at each support) x (velocity)^2
= zero only when stationary.
> zero after loss of support at first structural failure
>> zero as (upper floors mass) and velocity both increase.
When the fire weakened the supports and the magnitude of velocity exceeded zero and increased exponentially, so did the force and energy of impact.
= zero only when stationary.
> zero after loss of support at first structural failure
>> zero as (upper floors mass) and velocity both increase.
When the fire weakened the supports and the magnitude of velocity exceeded zero and increased exponentially, so did the force and energy of impact.
Why do you trolls always resort to esoteric mathematical formulas to explain the unexplainable?
Watch the third controlled demolition in this video to see what happens when only a few floors of a building are weakened.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9u1xGeitPk
The top portion remains intact. That is what would have happened to WTC7 if explosives had not been used.
Oct 30, 2015 16:32:12 #
payne1000 wrote:
Why do you trolls always resort to esoteric mathematical formulas to explain the unexplainable?
Watch the third controlled demolition in this video to see what happens when only a few floors of a building are weakened.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9u1xGeitPk
The top portion remains intact. That is what would have happened to WTC7 if explosives had not been used.
Watch the third controlled demolition in this video to see what happens when only a few floors of a building are weakened.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9u1xGeitPk
The top portion remains intact. That is what would have happened to WTC7 if explosives had not been used.
I checked your link and find it disturbing with respect to WTC7. It does look fishy, entirely different than the twin towers. About the twin towers, the video explanation about the cores raises doubts. I think the least convincing is the combined size and success of the conspiracy that makes it incredible. If true, it is still incredible.
But I do respect your interest. Somebody has to do a better job of analysis
Oct 30, 2015 17:11:04 #
MarvinSussman wrote:
I checked your link and find it disturbing with respect to WTC7. It does look fishy, entirely different than the twin towers. About the twin towers, the video explanation about the cores raises doubts. I think the least convincing is the combined size and success of the conspiracy that makes it incredible. If true, it is still incredible.
But I do respect your interest. Somebody has to do a better job of analysis
But I do respect your interest. Somebody has to do a better job of analysis
NYC fireman John Schroeder says explosions were going off in the North Tower lobby area before the tower fell. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBb00PQR1zo
Maintenance worker William Rodriquez says an explosion went off in the basement of the North Tower before the plane hit the tower. http://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/last-man-out-on-911-makes-shocking-disclosures/
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.