One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
“I knew exactly what we were doing in B******i”
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
Oct 25, 2015 09:21:45   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
Clinton has perjured herself before the House Committee and likely committed numerous felony acts by mishandling classified information through unsecured email t***smissions.

This is the admission from Hillary Clinton to Rep. Martha Roby in her testimony to the House Select Committee on B******i October 22, 2015. Amid her expert dancing around substantive answers, what emerged was culpability in the lack of action to either secure or extract the embassy team from B******i.

Revealed facts include the 600 requests for additional security in less than a year, beginning with the previous ambassador, Gene Cretz, who was afterward posted to Ghana. The newly confirmed ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, had more than 20 urgent requests included in that total (83 from May to September) and, although Secretary of State Clinton acknowledged that she “knew exactly” what was t***spiring in B******i, she did not allocate resources to the embassage protection. Instead, Clinton delegated the whole issue to “security professionals,” evidently in order to wipe her hands of the situation. Plausible deniability is the accepted term among the political class avoiding responsibility.

It was brought forth that, despite the escalating peril of the mission, for some reason Stevens did not have direct access to Clinton and was shoved off on the security professionals while Sidney Blumenthal had unlimited contact with the secretary. During the testimony, Clinton repeatedly noted that the ambassador had protection supplied by five trained individuals, though, in her responses she included in that number three who were added from another agency to perform the duty.

Rep. Mike Pompeo noted that the head of Ansar al Sharia, Mohamed al Zahawi, met with Wissam ben Hamid who was associated with mission security. On the day of the attack, Stevens cabled that ben Hamid (whom another agency identified as affiliated with Al Qaeda in August) had met with the B******i mission officials to discuss their security two days previous. Pompeo asked the secretary if she knew that her people had been meeting with an al Qaeda operative discussing security issues, “wittingly or unwittingly.”

Her answer? “Since we didn’t have ongoing personnel in B******i, I don’t know to whom you are referring.” A wholly unsatisfactory response considering the B******i mission was unofficial (and thus unrecognized as requiring a waiver to deny further security) and reliant on Libyan nationals to supply additional security. What Pompeo brought forth was the strong possibility of the attack being engineered from the inside.

But why? Not a single answer was forthcoming from the former Secretary of State who preferred to continue giving credence to the debunked blame placed on an inflammatory video. And this, even after she sent emails to her family and had conversations with the Libyan president and Egyptian prime minister admitting that the attack was an act of terrorism conducted by likely al Qaeda operatives.

The only conclusions that can be reached is that either Secretary Clinton was in the dark about occurrences in B******i, which could not be the case as she stated that she “knew exactly” what was going on there… or, that she was incompetent in her post… or that she did not care what was t***spiring… or that she fully understood not only the danger for her personnel but that she had reason to ignore Stevens’ pleas for additional security.

One other choice bit of information that has been uncovered since the hearing is that the ambassador had indeed requested the closure of the mission and to be extracted. Yet Clinton repeatedly testified that she deferred to Stevens’ superior understanding of the mission’s safety and that he had not requested extraction.

Throughout the whole 11-hour testimony, Clinton displayed consistent disdain, boredom and arrogance with every republican questioner. When fawned over by democrat representatives, the self-satisfied smile was unabated. In t***h, despite Representatives Smith and Sanchez apologizing for the grueling grilling by Clinton’s obvious enemies (all republicans), they suggested that the former secretary should not be submitted to such draining circumstances.

Should she be elected president, Clinton would need a good deal more stamina when a real crisis occurs than what’s necessary to ride out a congressional hearing. Oh, wait, she was serving in one of the most important cabinet offices when she failed to adequately respond to a crisis where her charge, Ambassador Stevens, and three other courageous men were murdered in an intricately engineered attack on an unsecured mission. A mission that Clinton appears to have virtually ignored for a grander scheme, which was possibly to obscure the illegal trafficking of arms through Libya to the “rebels” in Syria. And it has all led to naught but a swamp of Islamic State proliferation from Libya to Syria that is spreading throughout Europe and knocking on America’s door in the form of “refugees.”

There can be no other conclusion than Clinton has perjured herself before the House Committee and likely committed numerous felony acts by mishandling classified information through unsecured email t***smissions. The facts make it clear that Hillary Clinton cannot be trusted to serve in any office of government, let alone that of the Presidency.

http://canadafreepress.com/article/76267?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=530b9c2a3c-5_20_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-530b9c2a3c-297717381

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 09:45:00   #
MarvinSussman
 
JMHO wrote:
Clinton has perjured herself before the House Committee and likely committed numerous felony acts by mishandling classified information through unsecured email t***smissions.

This is the admission from Hillary Clinton to Rep. Martha Roby in her testimony to the House Select Committee on B******i October 22, 2015. Amid her expert dancing around substantive answers, what emerged was culpability in the lack of action to either secure or extract the embassy team from B******i.

Revealed facts include the 600 requests for additional security in less than a year, beginning with the previous ambassador, Gene Cretz, who was afterward posted to Ghana. The newly confirmed ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, had more than 20 urgent requests included in that total (83 from May to September) and, although Secretary of State Clinton acknowledged that she “knew exactly” what was t***spiring in B******i, she did not allocate resources to the embassage protection. Instead, Clinton delegated the whole issue to “security professionals,” evidently in order to wipe her hands of the situation. Plausible deniability is the accepted term among the political class avoiding responsibility.

It was brought forth that, despite the escalating peril of the mission, for some reason Stevens did not have direct access to Clinton and was shoved off on the security professionals while Sidney Blumenthal had unlimited contact with the secretary. During the testimony, Clinton repeatedly noted that the ambassador had protection supplied by five trained individuals, though, in her responses she included in that number three who were added from another agency to perform the duty.

Rep. Mike Pompeo noted that the head of Ansar al Sharia, Mohamed al Zahawi, met with Wissam ben Hamid who was associated with mission security. On the day of the attack, Stevens cabled that ben Hamid (whom another agency identified as affiliated with Al Qaeda in August) had met with the B******i mission officials to discuss their security two days previous. Pompeo asked the secretary if she knew that her people had been meeting with an al Qaeda operative discussing security issues, “wittingly or unwittingly.”

Her answer? “Since we didn’t have ongoing personnel in B******i, I don’t know to whom you are referring.” A wholly unsatisfactory response considering the B******i mission was unofficial (and thus unrecognized as requiring a waiver to deny further security) and reliant on Libyan nationals to supply additional security. What Pompeo brought forth was the strong possibility of the attack being engineered from the inside.

But why? Not a single answer was forthcoming from the former Secretary of State who preferred to continue giving credence to the debunked blame placed on an inflammatory video. And this, even after she sent emails to her family and had conversations with the Libyan president and Egyptian prime minister admitting that the attack was an act of terrorism conducted by likely al Qaeda operatives.

The only conclusions that can be reached is that either Secretary Clinton was in the dark about occurrences in B******i, which could not be the case as she stated that she “knew exactly” what was going on there… or, that she was incompetent in her post… or that she did not care what was t***spiring… or that she fully understood not only the danger for her personnel but that she had reason to ignore Stevens’ pleas for additional security.

One other choice bit of information that has been uncovered since the hearing is that the ambassador had indeed requested the closure of the mission and to be extracted. Yet Clinton repeatedly testified that she deferred to Stevens’ superior understanding of the mission’s safety and that he had not requested extraction.

Throughout the whole 11-hour testimony, Clinton displayed consistent disdain, boredom and arrogance with every republican questioner. When fawned over by democrat representatives, the self-satisfied smile was unabated. In t***h, despite Representatives Smith and Sanchez apologizing for the grueling grilling by Clinton’s obvious enemies (all republicans), they suggested that the former secretary should not be submitted to such draining circumstances.

Should she be elected president, Clinton would need a good deal more stamina when a real crisis occurs than what’s necessary to ride out a congressional hearing. Oh, wait, she was serving in one of the most important cabinet offices when she failed to adequately respond to a crisis where her charge, Ambassador Stevens, and three other courageous men were murdered in an intricately engineered attack on an unsecured mission. A mission that Clinton appears to have virtually ignored for a grander scheme, which was possibly to obscure the illegal trafficking of arms through Libya to the “rebels” in Syria. And it has all led to naught but a swamp of Islamic State proliferation from Libya to Syria that is spreading throughout Europe and knocking on America’s door in the form of “refugees.”

There can be no other conclusion than Clinton has perjured herself before the House Committee and likely committed numerous felony acts by mishandling classified information through unsecured email t***smissions. The facts make it clear that Hillary Clinton cannot be trusted to serve in any office of government, let alone that of the Presidency.

http://canadafreepress.com/article/76267?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=530b9c2a3c-5_20_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-530b9c2a3c-297717381
b Clinton has perjured herself before the House C... (show quote)


You probably forgot to mention that 100 other ambassadors were also asking for more security which could not be afforded since Republicans had take a chainsaw to the State Department's budget proposal, cutting it back by $12B, which would have paid for 100,000 guard-years or 1,000 guard-years per ambassador.

Bush had much more money for embassy and consulate guards and still suffered 12 attacks without a single Congressional hearing. Why? Could it be politics?

The Republican House k**led 4 great Americans. Congratulations!

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 09:54:15   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
MarvinSussman wrote:
You probably forgot to mention that 100 other ambassadors were also asking for more security which could not be afforded since Republicans had take a chainsaw to the State Department's budget proposal, cutting it back by $12B, which would have paid for 100,000 guard-years.

The Republican House k**led 5 good men.


What a knumbscull , show me 1 goverment employee who is not asking for more $$$$$$ ,, you must rememder that when the battle at was going on and repeated calls for help were sent,, oboma was MIA and the b***h clinton did not responed ,, knumbscull!!!!

Reply
 
 
Oct 25, 2015 10:03:15   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
MarvinSussman wrote:
You probably forgot to mention that 100 other ambassadors were also asking for more security which could not be afforded since Republicans had take a chainsaw to the State Department's budget proposal, cutting it back by $12B, which would have paid for 100,000 guard-years or 1,000 guard-years per ambassador.

Bush had much more money for embassy and consulate guards and still suffered 12 attacks without a single Congressional hearing. Why? Could it be politics?

The Republican House k**led 4 great Americans. Congratulations!
You probably forgot to mention that 100 other amba... (show quote)


Typical l*****t B.S.. You clowns on the left NEVER blame your failed leaders, it's always somebody else's fault...you l*****t's never take responsibility for anything. Even if one little iota of this B.S. is true, why didn't your incompetent idol Hillary extract them? Huh? Nah, instead they were abandoned, typical of coward l*****t's. No, Mr. Sussman, Obama and Hillary k**led those 4 Americans, not the Republicans.

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 10:41:15   #
MarvinSussman
 
JMHO wrote:
Typical l*****t B.S.. You clowns on the left NEVER blame your failed leaders, it's always somebody else's fault...you l*****t's never take responsibility for anything. Even if one little iota of this B.S. is true, why didn't your incompetent idol Hillary extract them? Huh? Nah, instead they were abandoned, typical of coward l*****t's. No, Mr. Sussman, Obama and Hillary k**led those 4 Americans, not the Republicans.


If Gowdy couldn't prove that crap, you can't either. Can it!

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 10:47:34   #
payne1000
 
JMHO wrote:
Typical l*****t B.S.. You clowns on the left NEVER blame your failed leaders, it's always somebody else's fault...you l*****t's never take responsibility for anything. Even if one little iota of this B.S. is true, why didn't your incompetent idol Hillary extract them? Huh? Nah, instead they were abandoned, typical of coward l*****t's. No, Mr. Sussman, Obama and Hillary k**led those 4 Americans, not the Republicans.


Bush and Cheney k**led almost 3,000 on 9/11 and 5,000 to 6,000 in the wars enabled by 9/11. Four dead seems so small in comparison.



Reply
Oct 25, 2015 11:57:35   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
payne1000 wrote:
Bush and Cheney k**led almost 3,000 on 9/11 and 5,000 to 6,000 in the wars enabled by 9/11. Four dead seems so small in comparison.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Thanks for the stupid joke, moron!

Reply
 
 
Oct 25, 2015 12:10:29   #
payne1000
 
JMHO wrote:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Thanks for the stupid joke, moron!


Everyone on this forum knows who the joke is, JMHO.

HASBARATS
HASBARATS...

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 12:35:34   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
payne1000 wrote:
Everyone on this forum knows who the joke is, JMHO.


Not as funny as you, pal!

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 12:56:14   #
payne1000
 
JMHO wrote:
Not as funny as you, pal!


Have you seen the video where Bush tries to explain why he and Cheney demanded to testify together before the 9/11 Commission instead of alone as the Commission requested?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiX71WIpsK0

Lee Hamilton, co-chair of the Commission, said the Bush administration was afraid the Commission was going to hang someone, that they were going to point the finger.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0LBARGBupM

Remember, the members of the 9/11 Commission were hand picked by the Bush Administration.

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 12:59:20   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
payne1000 wrote:
Have you seen the video where Bush tries to explain why he and Cheney demanded to testify together before the 9/11 Commission instead of alone as the Commission requested?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiX71WIpsK0

Lee Hamilton, co-chair of the Commission, said the Bush administration was afraid the Commission was going to hang someone, that they were going to point the finger.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0LBARGBupM

Remember, the members of the 9/11 Commission were hand picked by the Bush Administration.
Have you seen the video where Bush tries to explai... (show quote)


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Wh**ever, pal...yawn....

Reply
 
 
Oct 25, 2015 13:03:59   #
payne1000
 
JMHO wrote:
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Wh**ever, pal...yawn....


Maybe you'd rather discuss Obama and Hilary's f**ed assassination of Bin Laden?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkqTH91PxJM

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 13:06:50   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
payne1000 wrote:
Maybe you'd rather discuss Obama and Hilary's f**ed assassination of Bin Laden?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkqTH91PxJM


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Wh**ever, pal...yawn....

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 16:42:04   #
MarvinSussman
 
payne1000 wrote:
Have you seen the video where Bush tries to explain why he and Cheney demanded to testify together before the 9/11 Commission instead of alone as the Commission requested?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiX71WIpsK0

Lee Hamilton, co-chair of the Commission, said the Bush administration was afraid the Commission was going to hang someone, that they were going to point the finger.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0LBARGBupM

Remember, the members of the 9/11 Commission were hand picked by the Bush Administration.
Have you seen the video where Bush tries to explai... (show quote)


Everybody knew an airliner hijacking was being threatened. Bush/Cheney figured: "Let it happen. We'll ransom the airplane and then invade Iraq. And then be a war hero and get those tax cuts for the rich."

The Trade Center catastrophe stunned them for a few day but the plan succeeded anyway. Bush/Cheney got their war and their tax cuts.

Monsters in the White House. Fools in the Senate. Graves in Arlington Cemetery. Wing-nuts cheering to the very end..

Reply
Oct 25, 2015 17:18:12   #
payne1000
 
MarvinSussman wrote:
Everybody knew an airliner hijacking was being threatened. Bush/Cheney figured: "Let it happen. We'll ransom the airplane and then invade Iraq. And then be a war hero and get those tax cuts for the rich."

The Trade Center catastrophe stunned them for a few day but the plan succeeded anyway. Bush/Cheney got their war and their tax cuts.

Monsters in the White House. Fools in the Senate. Graves in Arlington Cemetery. Wing-nuts cheering to the very end..


Were Bush and Cheney unaware the towers were r****d with explosives? Surely the Secret Service and CIA who had offices in WTC7 alerted them to that fact. Sorry, LIHOP has never passed the smell test.

Reply
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.