By RUDY TAKALA (@RUDYTAKALA) 9/5/15 4:38 PM
ShareTweetRedditDiggMailPrintMore
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., will try to prevent the Senate from v****g on President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran.
In a statement issued on Saturday, Reid said that Democrats would attempt to use the filibuster to prevent the Senate from holding even a symbolic v**e on the issue, which would likely result in an embarrassing outcome for Democrats. "I recently informed Senator McConnell that after a period of robust debate, Democrats would be happy to proceed straight to a final passage v**e," Reid said in the statement, suggesting "robust debate" was a coy way of saying that the debate will not end unless Republicans can muster 60 v**es to do so.
Under the terms of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act passed earlier this year, the Senate has the option of v****g in favor of the deal, v****g against it or taking no action at all. If the Senate were to v**e against the deal, President Obama would still be able to veto the action. At least 67 v**es would be required to override such a veto.
Presently, Democrats have at least 38 v**es in favor of the deal. Just three Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and Ben Cardin, D-Md., have said they would join Republicans in v****g against it. If Republicans v**e in unison, that means at least 57 senators would v**e against the deal. While that would be short of the 67 required to override a veto, it would be enough to humiliate the administration.
KHH1 wrote:
By RUDY TAKALA (@RUDYTAKALA) 9/5/15 4:38 PM
ShareTweetRedditDiggMailPrintMore
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., will try to prevent the Senate from v****g on President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran.
In a statement issued on Saturday, Reid said that Democrats would attempt to use the filibuster to prevent the Senate from holding even a symbolic v**e on the issue, which would likely result in an embarrassing outcome for Democrats. "I recently informed Senator McConnell that after a period of robust debate, Democrats would be happy to proceed straight to a final passage v**e," Reid said in the statement, suggesting "robust debate" was a coy way of saying that the debate will not end unless Republicans can muster 60 v**es to do so.
Under the terms of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act passed earlier this year, the Senate has the option of v****g in favor of the deal, v****g against it or taking no action at all. If the Senate were to v**e against the deal, President Obama would still be able to veto the action. At least 67 v**es would be required to override such a veto.
Presently, Democrats have at least 38 v**es in favor of the deal. Just three Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and Ben Cardin, D-Md., have said they would join Republicans in v****g against it. If Republicans v**e in unison, that means at least 57 senators would v**e against the deal. While that would be short of the 67 required to override a veto, it would be enough to humiliate the administration.
By RUDY TAKALA (@RUDYTAKALA) 9/5/15 4:38 PM br S... (
show quote)
"SOMEONE"! COMMIT DUNGEY HARRY REID TO AN ASYLUM......QUICKLY!....{ WHAT A "P.O.S.! "}
It's a waste of time.
What Congress does will change nothing.
China, France,Germany,Britain and Russia have already given the deal a pass.
We have no control over Iran's already released assets.
America Can't Lead When We Elect A President That Doesn't Know How
...Or Cares
karpenter wrote:
America Can't Lead When We Elect A President That Doesn't Know How
...Or Cares
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Ronald Hatt wrote:
"SOMEONE"! COMMIT DUNGEY HARRY REID TO AN ASYLUM......QUICKLY!....{ WHAT A "P.O.S.! "}
I thought that Republicans were in the majority. How does the head of the minority party prevent a v**e?
Reid has so much money he thins he should rue the country
at41 wrote:
I thought that Republicans were in the majority. How does the head of the minority party prevent a v**e?
By "threatening" the Libturds, in the Congress!
{& who knows "what" dirt he has on the moderate/liberal Conservatives, in Congress}......America's current politicians, on both sides {the majority of them}, are impeding America's progress, at solving problems!
This P.O.S. Reid, has done as much harm to America, as "BATH HOUSE BARRY", & his band of miscreant Muslim, "closet homo's"!................................ :thumbdown:
KHH1 wrote:
By RUDY TAKALA (@RUDYTAKALA) 9/5/15 4:38 PM
ShareTweetRedditDiggMailPrintMore
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., will try to prevent the Senate from v****g on President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran.
In a statement issued on Saturday, Reid said that Democrats would attempt to use the filibuster to prevent the Senate from holding even a symbolic v**e on the issue, which would likely result in an embarrassing outcome for Democrats. "I recently informed Senator McConnell that after a period of robust debate, Democrats would be happy to proceed straight to a final passage v**e," Reid said in the statement, suggesting "robust debate" was a coy way of saying that the debate will not end unless Republicans can muster 60 v**es to do so.
Under the terms of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act passed earlier this year, the Senate has the option of v****g in favor of the deal, v****g against it or taking no action at all. If the Senate were to v**e against the deal, President Obama would still be able to veto the action. At least 67 v**es would be required to override such a veto.
Presently, Democrats have at least 38 v**es in favor of the deal. Just three Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and Ben Cardin, D-Md., have said they would join Republicans in v****g against it. If Republicans v**e in unison, that means at least 57 senators would v**e against the deal. While that would be short of the 67 required to override a veto, it would be enough to humiliate the administration.
By RUDY TAKALA (@RUDYTAKALA) 9/5/15 4:38 PM br S... (
show quote)
You didn't expect Reid to do anything good for the country, did you?
He needs to stay to just stay home .
karpenter wrote:
America Can't Lead When We Elect A President That Doesn't Know How
...Or Cares
What President . We don't have one .
Ronald Hatt wrote:
khh1 = delusional!
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
DamnYANKEE wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
:lol: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
So sad for the RIGHT that the DEMS are still calling the shots after that midterm victory of yours....just admit it...Dems are smarter than the GOP....Obama is getting HIS agenda we v**ed for him to....completed...he is who WE v**ed for to lead the country and his approval rating from US is right around 85-90%........so moan and whine all you like....things look great from my vantage point..... :thumbup:
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.