One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Proponents of Traditional Marriage please read ASAP!!!!!
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
Jul 25, 2015 15:26:06   #
Comment Loc: California
 
Singularity wrote:
Source:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2015/07/christian-bakers-fined-for-doxxing-lesbian-couple-via-social-media/?ref_widget=popular&ref_blog=friendlyatheist&ref_post=christians-dont-really-want-to-see-the-return-of-traditional-marriage


Christian Bakers Fined For Doxxing Lesbian Couple Via Social Media
July 10, 201573 Comments
by: Michael Stone
It wasn’t refusing to bake a wedding cake that earned Sweet Cakes By Melissa a $135,000 fine, it was the fact that the Christian bakers published the personal information of the lesbian couple requesting the cake, thus inviting fellow anti-gay Christians to attack and threaten the couple and their foster children.


While many Christians claim outrage about the fine, few know or are willing to admit the real reason for the hefty fine, and the despicable actions of Christian bakers Aaron and Melissa Klein that reigned terror upon the lesbian couple and their foster children.

What is widely known is that the anti-gay Christian bakers discriminated against the same-sex couple by denying them full and equal access to a place of public accommodation, which is against the law in Oregon, and presumably anywhere else in the U.S. that includes sexual orientation as a protected class.

What is not widely known, is that after the lesbian couple filed their original complaint, the Christian bakers published the lesbian couple’s personal information on social media, with terrifying and heart-breaking consequences.

After the publication of their personal information, the couple received death threats from many “concerned Christians,” threats that terrorized the couple and nearly caused them to lose custody of their foster children.

In its final order issued last week, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries found the Kleins liable for the threats made by others against the couple and awarded them to pay “$60,000 in damages to Laurel Bowman-Cryer and $75,000 in damages to Rachel Bowman-Cryer for emotional suffering.”

Sweet Cakes By Melissa closed its doors in 2013, after intense notoriety and public backlash accompanying the anti-gay discrimination investigation. The public controversy surrounding the bakery’s anti-gay stance proved to be disastrous for business. Many simply refused to do business with Sweet Cakes by Melissa after it became public knowledge that the bakery was openly discriminating against same-sex couples. -

See more at: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2015/07/christian-bakers-fined-for-doxxing-lesbian-couple-via-social-media/?ref_widget=popular&ref_blog=friendlyatheist&ref_post=christians-dont-really-want-to-see-the-return-of-traditional-marriage#sthash.GsIAPOcf.dpuf
Source: br http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressiv... (show quote)


Gay!!! Yeah! Homo, butterfly- lickers. I would not bake them a cake and I would not pay a fine but, what I would di for them is call on the Hells Angele's who might like to make their butterfly's flap their wings. Revenge is so much fun. If homies want to wreck lives let it be their own. Leave me aione. Public accommodation . The public does not own my business.

Reply
Jul 25, 2015 15:48:35   #
Singularity
 
Comment wrote:
Gay!!! Yeah! Homo, butterfly- lickers. I would not bake them a cake and I would not pay a fine but, what I would di for them is call on the Hells Angele's who might like to make their butterfly's flap their wings. Revenge is so much fun. If homies want to wreck lives let it be their own. Leave me aione. Public accommodation . The public does not own my business.


Your refusal to follow a judge's order would land you in jail, where it seems you belong!

Your "sour grapes" compels you to advocate criminal violence of the most d********gly heinous kind.

If you understood the law regarding the conduct of public businesses, you would know you are in the wrong. You use the phrase "public accommodation" so you have familiarity with these concepts. I suspect you understand it quite well. You just don't like it.

Reply
Jul 25, 2015 16:13:32   #
Comment Loc: California
 
Singularity wrote:
Your refusal to follow a judge's order would land you in jail, where it seems you belong!

Your "sour grapes" compels you to advocate criminal violence of the most d********gly heinous kind.

If you understood the law regarding the conduct of public businesses, you would know you are in the wrong. You use the phrase "public accommodation" so you have familiarity with these concepts. I suspect you understand it quite well. You just don't like it.


I am wrong by every socialist's values but, not mine. I don't give a big bull pile what socialists think or, you ,or your Lilly lickin socialists justices.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.