Yankee Clipper

L8erToots

Good for Charlie Daniels (I always did like his music) and I totally agree with what he said.
:thumbup:

Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts

"The fact is you insulted the prophet Muhammad … and you knew the consequences,” Choudary said.



This quote is from the article. And my first thought was... but "piss christ" is ok? If I'm not mistaken, it was even celebrated with an award.

"consequences" ???? Wtf is that all about?

P.S. It's good to see you back in the ring Clipp👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

just care

--------------------------
I like His music too ( the devil went down to Georgia ) I wish he would have Rosen ed up his bow and beat the devil with it , because somehow he ended up in the White house.

Armageddun Loc: The show me state

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Yankee Clipper

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Bravo, Charlie.

The hypocrisy of l*****ts is astonishing. They explode in insane frenzied attacks on some American patriots because they"offended" Islam's inglorious prophet with harmless cartoons, yet they do all in their power to promote homosexuality and a******n, they parade and push it in all the world's face. Both of which are far more offensive to Islam than a freaking cartoon. Who can say how many homosexuals in the ME have been murdered for their t***sgression--beheaded, hung, crucified, and thrown off tall buildings.

Heterosexual l*****ts by the hundreds will join a Gay P***e parade which undoubtedly fuels Jihadis' beliefs that America is an immoral, evil nation that must be destroyed (Ironic, isn't it), yet these same l*****ts come completely unhinged and jump on Pam Geller's bones for sponsoring a f*cking cartoon contest? The pathology of l*****t hypocrisy is unfathomable.

straightUp Loc: California

There we go Adolph, start removing people from the country. How shall we do it? Send the secret police to their houses in the dead of night and covertly steal them away, or should we execute them? I mean after all, they had an opinion, right?

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Why don't you set the example, do the honorable thing and just leave?

straightUp Loc: California

They called Pam Geller "incendiary organizer". How is that a frenzied attack? If anyone is frenzied it's you i***ts getting all pissed off that anyone would dare call her incendiary. Of course she's incendiary. She organized a contest that was obviously designed to offend Muslims. How is that not incendiary?

Since you folks are so lame at figuring the liberal view - let me give you mine. As an advocate of free-speech, I think Geller should have the right to organize these contests even though I think it's about the dumbest thing I've seen.

As an advocate of free-speech I also support your right to drive into South-Central LA with a tee-shirt that says "Fuck N****rs". Just don't cry for my sympathy when you get the crap beaten out of you.

Same thing.


How is that ironic? Muslim extremists are religious conservatives - they h**e liberals... they H**E secularist more than anything. When they say they h**e Americans, we're the ones they are talking about. And we aren't so fond of them either, they remind us of our own religious-right.


When an event is designed to insult religious fanatics and succeeds in provoking gun fire, it's hardly just a fucking cartoon contest.

Also, there is a big difference between not complying with a religion and insulting it. Homosexuality is out of compliance with Islam, drawing cartoons of Mohammed is an actual insult to Islam.

Once again, your statement lies on a bed of lies and distortions.

straightUp Loc: California

Why? Because you don't like my opinions?

Tyster

You may be correct in suggesting that removing someone for their opinion is Un-American, but you echoed the reactionary sentiment with one of your own. Equating one's desire to not tolerate anti-social behavior with that of recent history's most vile statesman is jumping on the extreme reaction yourself.

If someone comes to our shores, they are either a visitor or have met qualifications to remain in this country. However, if they are going to abuse our freedoms to the extent that they threaten another's life, liberty or their pursuit of happiness, then their "permission" to remain in this country should be placed in jeopardy.

For those that have developed these attitudes and were "home-grown" so to speak, there still have to be limitations where the "exercising of their rights" infringes on the exercise of others. I find the burning of a US f**g repugnant, and the display of the Christian cross in urine to be d********g, but I cannot deny your right to express those sentiments should you choose to do so. It has been long accepted that patriots and Christians must accept ridicule as part of our freedoms in this great country.

The sad thing is that we now identify certain groups and brand them untouchable... it is somehow abhorrent to draw a cartoon that may lampoon a religious icon of one sect, while mercilessly depicting the icons of another. We get in a tizzy when a Christian pizza maker indicates they wouldn't be comfortable catering a Gay wedding, but completely ignore at least 3 Muslim bakeries that flatly refused a like service.

Either all viewpoints and religions are afforded the same protections or none should be expected to be protected. If you don't support my right to express myself, how long will it be until you lose your rights? If these standards of behavior do not meet with acceptance, then maybe those who are intolerant should be encouraged to find a home more attune to their ideals.

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

Once again, we know how much you wish the United States was totally doomed and to be made into your socialistic void of anything at all that resembles what the United States was founded for. Bad news for you, buckwheat. As much "smarmy" verbal stink you can spew out, makes no difference to the reality of what you are. I tend to think in most of the entire World's societies where freedoms do exist, those societies have courts and upon findings of those courts do still execute t*****rs. For some scum bag like you, I don't think your neck would be any different than anyone else that has been hung for high treason, do you?

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

Because you are not American, obviously you desire to see America be destroyed and that is just not welcome here in this USA. We know there should be some third world nation that your sick and pathetic lifestyle would be a well suited match for the likes of you. So find one and pack a bag and go. Let us know how well your BS flies there, O.K.?

straightUp Loc: California

I think you're stretching... First of all, I'm not equating one's desire to not tolerate anti-social behavior with anything. I'm equating one's desire to deny a harmless personal opinion to THE archetype of tyranny. Describing Pam Geller as incendiary is certainly not anti-social behavior, sponsoring a contest to see who can best insult the second largest religion in the world is.


If they are visitors yes. If they are resident, then they should be handled by our system the same way any natural-born American that threatens the lives, liberty or pursuit of happiness of others.


Not just "patriots" and Christians... EVERYONE has to accept ridicule as part of the freedoms in any of the great countries that have them.


That's a dramatic exaggeration.


I don't quite understand how a cartoon can be so offensive either. But then again, I don't see the big deal with a burning f**g. You do, so I would think you would understand the Muslim offense to the cartoons better than I can.


Who is "we"? *I* didn't get in a tizzy when that Christian pizza maker refused to cater to a gay wedding. I think he's a dick but I also think he has the right as a business owner to refuse service. It's not like there isn't a million other pizza places to choose from. I feel the same way about the Muslim bakeries. If they refuse service, it's their right. They might be dicks for doing it, but they have that right.


I agree. Fortunately, the U.S. Constitution recommends the later... Basically the idea is that the government shall make no laws respecting the establishment of religion.


So what places would you recommend for intolerant Christians?