Give it up, Republicans. Your base is dying off
May 21, 2015 16:12:45 #
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Perhaps, you need to enlighten all of those who seem been able to determine what the hell the topic was talking about. You seem to either read something different into it or maybe you are somewhat dense. But I really think you are just trying to stir something or someone up a bit, which is it?
Well, you certainly seem easily stirred up.
May 21, 2015 16:13:46 #
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Perhaps, you need to enlighten all of those who seem been able to determine what the hell the topic was talking about. You seem to either read something different into it or maybe you are somewhat dense. But I really think you are just trying to stir something or someone up a bit, which is it?
Get this: what exactly is the point of this thread? Are you trying to frighten the GOP into giving up. Don't forget, the GOP won the last e******n.
May 21, 2015 16:14:05 #
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Perhaps, you need to enlighten all of those who seem been able to determine what the hell the topic was talking about. You seem to either read something different into it or maybe you are somewhat dense. But I really think you are just trying to stir something or someone up a bit, which is it?
You hit on it right there.
May 21, 2015 16:17:14 #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Get this: what exactly is the point of this thread? Are you trying to frighten the GOP into giving up. Don't forget, the GOP won the last e******n.
No point, just thought it was an interesting topic. There is probably as much t***h in it as there is fiction.
May 21, 2015 16:18:15 #
Yankee Clipper wrote:
No point, just thought it was an interesting topic. There is probably as much t***h in it as there is fiction.
Well, then, you finally get the "point" of my comment.
May 21, 2015 16:31:20 #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
Well, then, you finally get the "point" of my comment.
You just want to start a fight of some sort for no other reason than it makes you feel better, I guess. Have at it someone will oblige you I am sure.
May 21, 2015 16:33:03 #
jelun wrote:
You hit on it right there.
Now with the Memorial Day coming up so soon, will you be sending your Daddy, Adolph, his normal flowers, or more this year for his grave site?
May 21, 2015 16:34:05 #
Yankee Clipper wrote:
You just want to start a fight of some sort for no other reason than it makes you feel better, I guess. Have at it someone will oblige you I am sure.
But it's so easy to do with you!!
May 21, 2015 16:34:24 #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
The dead dogs too. They didn't find any evidence of that either. I wonder why. Could it be G. Soros use of wealth to conceal evidence?
The dead dogs too. They didn't find any evidence of that either. I wonder why. Could it be G. Soros use of wealth to conceal evidence?
..... and in addition to the 100'd of thousands of discovered suppressed v**es, how many more are concealed by the Kochs, Trumps, Adelsons and other corporate billions?
You're not credible of you're ONLY concerned about unproven fraud as opposed to proven suppression.
If you're GENUINELY interested in v**er rights, you should be MUCH more concerned about the undeniable suppression efforts as opposed to the rightfully deniable fraud.
May 21, 2015 16:41:47 #
1OfDem wrote:
Too bad that numerous well funded investigations have turned up effectively nothing in v***r f***d. A few attempted cases, but nothing that would effect the outcome of an e******n.
Opposed to hundreds of thousands of legit v**es suppressed in many parts of the country.
Wh**ever 'fraud' that has occurred it's 1000's of times less than v**er suppression.
Opposed to hundreds of thousands of legit v**es suppressed in many parts of the country.
Wh**ever 'fraud' that has occurred it's 1000's of times less than v**er suppression.
I will argue that point later. Regarding "v**er suppression," it does not exist, in your words, "nothing that would effect the outcome of an e******n." Most of the people you claim are disenfranchised are poor b****s, who mostly receive government benefits for which they must have ID that would satisfy v**er ID requirements.
Felons, i*****l a***ns, corpses, and multiple v**ers have a much more difficult time v****g in states that require ID. Given the fact that there are 2 years between substantive e******ns, and most states have either free or low cost ID available, there is not much excuse for not having an ID. How do these people cash checks, receive benefits, drive a car, or do any of the plethora of things intrinsic to modern life that require an ID? The push against v**er ID is simply a push to make it easier for wetbacks to v**e Democrat.
May 21, 2015 16:42:00 #
May 21, 2015 16:43:47 #
1OfDem wrote:
..... and in addition to the 100'd of thousands of discovered suppressed v**es, how many more are concealed by the Kochs, Trumps, Adelsons and other corporate billions?
You're not credible of you're ONLY concerned about unproven fraud as opposed to proven suppression.
If you're GENUINELY interested in v**er rights, you should be MUCH more concerned about the undeniable suppression efforts as opposed to the rightfully deniable fraud.
You're not credible of you're ONLY concerned about unproven fraud as opposed to proven suppression.
If you're GENUINELY interested in v**er rights, you should be MUCH more concerned about the undeniable suppression efforts as opposed to the rightfully deniable fraud.
What sort of drugs are you using? I may want some of them in case I need to take a vacation from reality.
May 21, 2015 16:48:27 #
1OfDem wrote:
..... and in addition to the 100'd of thousands of discovered suppressed v**es, how many more are concealed by the Kochs, Trumps, Adelsons and other corporate billions?
You're not credible of you're ONLY concerned about unproven fraud as opposed to proven suppression.
If you're GENUINELY interested in v**er rights, you should be MUCH more concerned about the undeniable suppression efforts as opposed to the rightfully deniable fraud.
You're not credible of you're ONLY concerned about unproven fraud as opposed to proven suppression.
If you're GENUINELY interested in v**er rights, you should be MUCH more concerned about the undeniable suppression efforts as opposed to the rightfully deniable fraud.
I am not genuinely interested in v**er rights. I am interested in having "educated, informed v**ers" v**e. Anything else demeans MY v**e.
May 21, 2015 16:53:42 #
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I am not genuinely interested in v**er rights. I am interested in having "educated, informed v**ers" v**e. Anything else demeans MY v**e.
I am also in favor of "educated, informed v**ers" v****g. I just would like to see "less than legal v**ers" NOT v****g. With this new amnesty, and the likliehood of wetbacks getting drivers licenses and Social Security numbers, there is a real possibility of v***r f***d that has not existed before. I know people here on the county e******n board who are genuinely concerned about this, given the very high number of i******s living in this county.
May 21, 2015 16:55:54 #
Loki wrote:
I am also in favor of "educated, informed v**ers" v****g. I just would like to see "less than legal v**ers" NOT v****g. With this new amnesty, and the likliehood of wetbacks getting drivers licenses and Social Security numbers, there is a real possibility of v***r f***d that has not existed before. I know people here on the county e******n board who are genuinely concerned about this, given the very high number of i******s living in this county.
I agree, Loki.
It's why I wonder sometimes if democracy is for America.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.