One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Give it up, Republicans. Your base is dying off
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
May 21, 2015 14:10:25   #
Yankee Clipper
 
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/18/give-it-up-republicans-your-base-is-dying-off/?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl


Give it up, Republicans. Your base is dying off
posted at 10:41 am on May 18, 2015 by Jazz Shaw

Share on Facebook
2K
2K SHARES

As we “all know” from listening to cable news spokesmodels, the GOP is the party of old white people. They’re a reliable bunch as v**ers go, and can usually be counted to show up on e******n day and make their voices heard. Aside from putting up with the occasional demands to get off their lawn when you’re handing out campaign literature, it’s a fairly comfortable arrangement. But Politico’s Daniel McGraw helpfully points out the one downside of building your party around this particular demographic group… they tend to die at an alarming rate.

There’s been much written about how millennials are becoming a reliable v****g bloc for Democrats, but there’s been much less attention paid to one of the biggest get-out-the-v**e challenges for the Republican Party heading into the next p**********l e******n: Hundreds of thousands of their traditional core supporters won’t be able to turn out to v**e at all.

The party’s core is dying off by the day.

Since the average Republican is significantly older than the average Democrat, far more Republicans than Democrats have died since the 2012 e******ns. To make matters worse, the GOP is attracting fewer first-time v**ers. Unless the party is able to make inroads with new v**ers, or discover a fountain of youth, the GOP’s slow demographic slide will continue e******n to e******n. Actuarial tables make that part clear, but just how much of a problem for the GOP is this?

McGraw goes on to conduct some “unofficial” research to support his claim, based pretty much entirely on what he acknowledges is a combination of anecdotal evidence and “back-of-the-napkin math.” Some of it is rather fascinating and, to be honest, Republicans shouldn’t discount it entirely. For example, citing 2012 exit polls combined with census bureau mortality rates, the author estimates that 2.75 million Romney v**ers will be dead by November of 2016, while 2.3 million Obama v**ers will have shuffled off this mortal coil. That’s not an insignificant gap, even when spread across all fifty states.

As for the v**ers who will be replacing them (with the exception of the horizontal Democrats in the Chicago area who will generally still be v****g) the news isn’t much better in McGraw’s estimation. There were 13 million kids in the fifteen to seventeen year age bracket in 2012 who will be eligible to head to the polls next year. If the traditional average of 45% of them v**e and if they split 65-35 in favor of the Democrats (as polls seem to indicate) then the Donkey party picks up 2.5 million new v**ers while losing fewer to attrition than the GOP. That’s a total spread of roughly 3 million people. So if these calculations are correct, why should Republicans even bother to get out of bed in the morning?

Well, first of all, there are an awfully large number of “ifs” in those sentences. Life spans in the United States continue to increase, so the older v**ers may be stubbornly sticking around longer than Democrats might wish. Also, just taking a general swath of how many people are dying doesn’t indicate how many of them were active v**ers. The same questions apply to the millennials coming up into the mix. Predictions tend to be sketchy things.

But since we’re relying on anecdotal evidence anyway, I have to wonder how much t***h there is to the “Party of the Old People” meme in the first place. Did any of you attend CPAC or Right Online this year? Yes, there were some crusty old dinosaurs like me hobbling around to be sure. But the big crowds who were packing the seminars and the sports bars looked decidedly less geriatric.

Like this.
CPAC1

Or this attentive crowd.
CPAC2

Look through John Hawkins’ collection of photos. It’s not exactly the old age home.

Sure, this is anecdotal as well, but the people I see swelling the crowds at conservative events contain vast numbers of young, energized activists. Honestly, I don’t think the GOP is dying off at all. In fact, a decade or so of Democrat control in Washington is probably doing more to spawn a new generation of young conservatives than the most aggressive grassroots outreach movement could ever manage.

Reply
May 21, 2015 14:32:34   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/18/give-it-up-republicans-your-base-is-dying-off/?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl


Sure, this is anecdotal as well, but the people I see swelling the crowds at conservative events contain vast numbers of young, energized activists. Honestly, I don’t think the GOP is dying off at all. In fact, a decade or so of Democrat control in Washington is probably doing more to spawn a new generation of young conservatives than the most aggressive grassroots outreach movement could ever manage.
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/18/give-it-up-r... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 21, 2015 15:25:03   #
just care
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/18/give-it-up-republicans-your-base-is-dying-off/?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl


Give it up, Republicans. Your base is dying off
posted at 10:41 am on May 18, 2015 by Jazz Shaw

Share on Facebook
2K
2K SHARES

As we “all know” from listening to cable news spokesmodels, the GOP is the party of old white people. They’re a reliable bunch as v**ers go, and can usually be counted to show up on e******n day and make their voices heard. Aside from putting up with the occasional demands to get off their lawn when you’re handing out campaign literature, it’s a fairly comfortable arrangement. But Politico’s Daniel McGraw helpfully points out the one downside of building your party around this particular demographic group… they tend to die at an alarming rate.

There’s been much written about how millennials are becoming a reliable v****g bloc for Democrats, but there’s been much less attention paid to one of the biggest get-out-the-v**e challenges for the Republican Party heading into the next p**********l e******n: Hundreds of thousands of their traditional core supporters won’t be able to turn out to v**e at all.

The party’s core is dying off by the day.

Since the average Republican is significantly older than the average Democrat, far more Republicans than Democrats have died since the 2012 e******ns. To make matters worse, the GOP is attracting fewer first-time v**ers. Unless the party is able to make inroads with new v**ers, or discover a fountain of youth, the GOP’s slow demographic slide will continue e******n to e******n. Actuarial tables make that part clear, but just how much of a problem for the GOP is this?

McGraw goes on to conduct some “unofficial” research to support his claim, based pretty much entirely on what he acknowledges is a combination of anecdotal evidence and “back-of-the-napkin math.” Some of it is rather fascinating and, to be honest, Republicans shouldn’t discount it entirely. For example, citing 2012 exit polls combined with census bureau mortality rates, the author estimates that 2.75 million Romney v**ers will be dead by November of 2016, while 2.3 million Obama v**ers will have shuffled off this mortal coil. That’s not an insignificant gap, even when spread across all fifty states.

As for the v**ers who will be replacing them (with the exception of the horizontal Democrats in the Chicago area who will generally still be v****g) the news isn’t much better in McGraw’s estimation. There were 13 million kids in the fifteen to seventeen year age bracket in 2012 who will be eligible to head to the polls next year. If the traditional average of 45% of them v**e and if they split 65-35 in favor of the Democrats (as polls seem to indicate) then the Donkey party picks up 2.5 million new v**ers while losing fewer to attrition than the GOP. That’s a total spread of roughly 3 million people. So if these calculations are correct, why should Republicans even bother to get out of bed in the morning?

Well, first of all, there are an awfully large number of “ifs” in those sentences. Life spans in the United States continue to increase, so the older v**ers may be stubbornly sticking around longer than Democrats might wish. Also, just taking a general swath of how many people are dying doesn’t indicate how many of them were active v**ers. The same questions apply to the millennials coming up into the mix. Predictions tend to be sketchy things.

But since we’re relying on anecdotal evidence anyway, I have to wonder how much t***h there is to the “Party of the Old People” meme in the first place. Did any of you attend CPAC or Right Online this year? Yes, there were some crusty old dinosaurs like me hobbling around to be sure. But the big crowds who were packing the seminars and the sports bars looked decidedly less geriatric.

Like this.
CPAC1

Or this attentive crowd.
CPAC2

Look through John Hawkins’ collection of photos. It’s not exactly the old age home.

Sure, this is anecdotal as well, but the people I see swelling the crowds at conservative events contain vast numbers of young, energized activists. Honestly, I don’t think the GOP is dying off at all. In fact, a decade or so of Democrat control in Washington is probably doing more to spawn a new generation of young conservatives than the most aggressive grassroots outreach movement could ever manage.
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/18/give-it-up-r... (show quote)


Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Isn't Daniel Mcgraw the one who was extremely addicted to cigarettes and tried to kick it by using crystal meth?
Seems to have worked out really well!

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2015 15:34:56   #
JBMUHLENBRUCH Loc: Texas
 
And Democrats are murdering off their v**ers before they are even born and gay Democrats don't reproduce. Is this considered in your new calculation?

Reply
May 21, 2015 15:50:34   #
Yankee Clipper
 
just care wrote:
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Isn't Daniel Mcgraw the one who was extremely addicted to cigarettes and tried to kick it by using crystal meth?
Seems to have worked out really well!


I don't know.

Reply
May 21, 2015 15:54:03   #
CarolSeer2016
 
Yankee Clipper wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/18/give-it-up-republicans-your-base-is-dying-off/?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl


Give it up, Republicans. Your base is dying off
posted at 10:41 am on May 18, 2015 by Jazz Shaw

Share on Facebook
2K
2K SHARES

As we “all know” from listening to cable news spokesmodels, the GOP is the party of old white people. They’re a reliable bunch as v**ers go, and can usually be counted to show up on e******n day and make their voices heard. Aside from putting up with the occasional demands to get off their lawn when you’re handing out campaign literature, it’s a fairly comfortable arrangement. But Politico’s Daniel McGraw helpfully points out the one downside of building your party around this particular demographic group… they tend to die at an alarming rate.

There’s been much written about how millennials are becoming a reliable v****g bloc for Democrats, but there’s been much less attention paid to one of the biggest get-out-the-v**e challenges for the Republican Party heading into the next p**********l e******n: Hundreds of thousands of their traditional core supporters won’t be able to turn out to v**e at all.

The party’s core is dying off by the day.

Since the average Republican is significantly older than the average Democrat, far more Republicans than Democrats have died since the 2012 e******ns. To make matters worse, the GOP is attracting fewer first-time v**ers. Unless the party is able to make inroads with new v**ers, or discover a fountain of youth, the GOP’s slow demographic slide will continue e******n to e******n. Actuarial tables make that part clear, but just how much of a problem for the GOP is this?

McGraw goes on to conduct some “unofficial” research to support his claim, based pretty much entirely on what he acknowledges is a combination of anecdotal evidence and “back-of-the-napkin math.” Some of it is rather fascinating and, to be honest, Republicans shouldn’t discount it entirely. For example, citing 2012 exit polls combined with census bureau mortality rates, the author estimates that 2.75 million Romney v**ers will be dead by November of 2016, while 2.3 million Obama v**ers will have shuffled off this mortal coil. That’s not an insignificant gap, even when spread across all fifty states.

As for the v**ers who will be replacing them (with the exception of the horizontal Democrats in the Chicago area who will generally still be v****g) the news isn’t much better in McGraw’s estimation. There were 13 million kids in the fifteen to seventeen year age bracket in 2012 who will be eligible to head to the polls next year. If the traditional average of 45% of them v**e and if they split 65-35 in favor of the Democrats (as polls seem to indicate) then the Donkey party picks up 2.5 million new v**ers while losing fewer to attrition than the GOP. That’s a total spread of roughly 3 million people. So if these calculations are correct, why should Republicans even bother to get out of bed in the morning?

Well, first of all, there are an awfully large number of “ifs” in those sentences. Life spans in the United States continue to increase, so the older v**ers may be stubbornly sticking around longer than Democrats might wish. Also, just taking a general swath of how many people are dying doesn’t indicate how many of them were active v**ers. The same questions apply to the millennials coming up into the mix. Predictions tend to be sketchy things.

But since we’re relying on anecdotal evidence anyway, I have to wonder how much t***h there is to the “Party of the Old People” meme in the first place. Did any of you attend CPAC or Right Online this year? Yes, there were some crusty old dinosaurs like me hobbling around to be sure. But the big crowds who were packing the seminars and the sports bars looked decidedly less geriatric.

Like this.
CPAC1

Or this attentive crowd.
CPAC2

Look through John Hawkins’ collection of photos. It’s not exactly the old age home.

Sure, this is anecdotal as well, but the people I see swelling the crowds at conservative events contain vast numbers of young, energized activists. Honestly, I don’t think the GOP is dying off at all. In fact, a decade or so of Democrat control in Washington is probably doing more to spawn a new generation of young conservatives than the most aggressive grassroots outreach movement could ever manage.
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/18/give-it-up-r... (show quote)


I have only one thing to say: "What the hell are you talking about?"

Reply
May 21, 2015 15:59:10   #
Yankee Clipper
 
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I have only one thing to say: "What the hell are you talking about?" Wh**ever you care to talk about if you didn't understand the suggested topic.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2015 16:00:03   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
JBMUHLENBRUCH wrote:
And Democrats are murdering off their v**ers before they are even born and gay Democrats don't reproduce. Is this considered in your new calculation?


Why do you think they want wetbacks legalized? As far as being dead, when has that ever stopped a Democrat from v****g?

Reply
May 21, 2015 16:01:11   #
CarolSeer2016
 
I repeat, what the hell are you talking about?

Reply
May 21, 2015 16:01:40   #
JBMUHLENBRUCH Loc: Texas
 
There IS such a thing as a stupid question. I'm talking about a******ns.

Reply
May 21, 2015 16:03:48   #
Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana
 
Loki wrote:
Why do you think they want wetbacks legalized? As far as being dead, when has that ever stopped a Democrat from v****g?


In the last few e******ns, even the dead Republicans were v****g Democrat.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2015 16:09:13   #
1OfDem
 
Peaver Bogart wrote:
In the last few e******ns, even the dead Republicans were v****g Democrat.


Too bad that numerous well funded investigations have turned up effectively nothing in v***r f***d. A few attempted cases, but nothing that would effect the outcome of an e******n.

Opposed to hundreds of thousands of legit v**es suppressed in many parts of the country.

Wh**ever 'fraud' that has occurred it's 1000's of times less than v**er suppression.

Reply
May 21, 2015 16:10:25   #
CarolSeer2016
 
Peaver Bogart wrote:
In the last few e******ns, even the dead Republicans were v****g Democrat.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

The dead dogs too. They didn't find any evidence of that either. I wonder why. Could it be G. Soros use of wealth to conceal evidence?

Reply
May 21, 2015 16:10:38   #
wuzblynd Loc: thomson georgia
 
JBMUHLENBRUCH wrote:
And Democrats are murdering off their v**ers before they are even born and gay Democrats don't reproduce. Is this considered in your new calculation?





:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 21, 2015 16:12:13   #
Yankee Clipper
 
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I repeat, what the hell are you talking about?


Perhaps, you need to enlighten all of those who seem been able to determine what the hell the topic was talking about. You seem to either read something different into it or maybe you are somewhat dense. But I really think you are just trying to stir something or someone up a bit, which is it?

Reply
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.