One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
God vs EVILution.... #4
Page <<first <prev 68 of 68
Jan 24, 2018 09:42:51   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
bdamage wrote:
There may also be "much to learn" about the spiritual aspect of our being.

Here is #21-25:

#21 Perhaps the most famous fossil in the history of the theory of evolution, “Piltdown Man”, turned out to be a giant h**x.

#22 If the neutron were not about 1.001 times the mass of the proton, all protons would have decayed into neutrons or all neutrons would have decayed into protons, and therefore life would not be possible. How can we account for this?

#23 If gravity was stronger or weaker by the slimmest of margins, then life sustaining stars like the sun could not exist. This would also make life impossible. How can we account for this?

#24 Why did evolutionist Dr. Lyall Watson make the following statement?…

“The fossils that decorate our family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens. The remarkable fact is that all of the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin!”

#25 Apes and humans are very different genetically. As DarwinConspiracy.com explains, “the human Y c********e has twice as many genes as the chimpanzee Y c********e and the c********e structures are not at all similar.”
There may also be "much to learn" about ... (show quote)


21. That's not the only h**x in fossil history!

22.I don't know if that is an absolute t***h, but if it is, then it just the way it is.

23. Infinite possibilities in an infinite number of universes. Scientists feel fairly confident that gravity is much weaker in our universe than in others.

24. Because there aren't very many!

25. We are genetically closer to the gorilla than the chimp, but either way, we are pretty close and the differences are few.

Science can't account for all they observe, they simply observe it and see how it fits into what we know NOW. When we know other things, it changes.

25.

Reply
Jan 24, 2018 19:08:54   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
eagleye13 wrote:
I am beginning to wonder of Liberal's c********es are more similar to Chimps than conservatives.
They are slower to pick up on things.




Now you got me thinkin' the possibility of evolution!

Reply
Jan 24, 2018 19:13:28   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
21. That's not the only h**x in fossil history!

22.I don't know if that is an absolute t***h, but if it is, then it just the way it is.

23. Infinite possibilities in an infinite number of universes. Scientists feel fairly confident that gravity is much weaker in our universe than in others.

24. Because there aren't very many!

25. We are genetically closer to the gorilla than the chimp, but either way, we are pretty close and the differences are few.

Science can't account for all they observe, they simply observe it and see how it fits into what we know NOW. When we know other things, it changes.

25.
21. That's not the only h**x in fossil history! b... (show quote)


As to your response to #25......



Reply
 
 
Jan 24, 2018 19:47:49   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
bdamage wrote:
As to your response to #25......


It's true. Many sequences for certain proteins are virtually unchanged from man down to yeast. Cytochromes for one.

Reply
Jan 24, 2018 20:12:54   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
It's true. Many sequences for certain proteins are virtually unchanged from man down to yeast. Cytochromes for one.


Still a pretty funny meme though, right?

Reply
Jan 24, 2018 21:26:11   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
bdamage wrote:
Still a pretty funny meme though, right?


It is. The meme guys who come up with these things probably sit around drinking barley wines, brain storming ideas.

Tonight, it was an IPA. Only 6.8. Nice mouth feel. Mild hops. Just a touch of sweet. Not a west coast IPA at all. I love shopping at Whole Pay Check!

Reply
Jan 25, 2018 10:15:05   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
It is. The meme guys who come up with these things probably sit around drinking barley wines, brain storming ideas.

Tonight, it was an IPA. Only 6.8. Nice mouth feel. Mild hops. Just a touch of sweet. Not a west coast IPA at all. I love shopping at Whole Pay Check!


Nice!
My fav is still Dogfish 90 minute.

Reply
 
 
Jan 25, 2018 10:25:06   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
bdamage wrote:
Nice!
My fav is still Dogfish 90 minute.


One of my fav's also. It's their signature beer.

Reply
Jan 25, 2018 10:30:42   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
It's true. Many sequences for certain proteins are virtually unchanged from man down to yeast. Cytochromes for one.


#26 How can we explain the creation of new information that is required for one animal to turn into another animal? No evolutionary process has ever been shown to be able to create new biological information. One scientist described the incredible amount of new information that would be required to t***sform microbes into men this way…

“The key issue is the type of change required — to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content, from over half a million DNA ‘letters’ of even the ‘simplest’ self-reproducing organism to three billion ‘letters’ (stored in each human cell nucleus).”

#27 Evolutionists would have us believe that there are nice, neat fossil layers with older fossils being found in the deepest layers and newer fossils being found in the newest layers. This simply is not true at all…

The fossil layers are not found in the ground in the nice neat clean order that evolutionists illustrate them to be in their textbooks. There is not one place on the surface of the earth where you may dig straight down and pass through the fossil layers in the order shown in the textbooks. The neat order of one layer upon another does not exist in nature. The fossil bearing layers are actually found out of order, upside down (backwards according to evolutionary theory), missing (from where evolutionists would expect them to be) or interlaced (“younger” and “older” layers found in repeating sequences). “Out of place” fossils are the rule and not the exception throughout the fossil record.

#28 Evolutionists believe that the ancestors of birds developed hollow bones over thousands of generations so that they would eventually be light enough to fly. This makes absolutely no sense and is beyond ridiculous.

#29 If dinosaurs really are tens of millions of years old, why have scientists found dinosaur bones with soft tissue still in them? The following is from an NBC News report about one of these discoveries…

For more than a century, the study of dinosaurs has been limited to fossilized bones. Now, researchers have recovered 70 million-year-old soft tissue, including what may be blood vessels and cells, from a Tyrannosaurus rex.

#30 Which evolved first: blood, the heart, or the blood vessels for the blood to travel through?

Reply
Jan 25, 2018 12:08:26   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
bdamage wrote:
#26 How can we explain the creation of new information that is required for one animal to turn into another animal? No evolutionary process has ever been shown to be able to create new biological information. One scientist described the incredible amount of new information that would be required to t***sform microbes into men this way…

“The key issue is the type of change required — to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content, from over half a million DNA ‘letters’ of even the ‘simplest’ self-reproducing organism to three billion ‘letters’ (stored in each human cell nucleus).”

#27 Evolutionists would have us believe that there are nice, neat fossil layers with older fossils being found in the deepest layers and newer fossils being found in the newest layers. This simply is not true at all…

The fossil layers are not found in the ground in the nice neat clean order that evolutionists illustrate them to be in their textbooks. There is not one place on the surface of the earth where you may dig straight down and pass through the fossil layers in the order shown in the textbooks. The neat order of one layer upon another does not exist in nature. The fossil bearing layers are actually found out of order, upside down (backwards according to evolutionary theory), missing (from where evolutionists would expect them to be) or interlaced (“younger” and “older” layers found in repeating sequences). “Out of place” fossils are the rule and not the exception throughout the fossil record.

#28 Evolutionists believe that the ancestors of birds developed hollow bones over thousands of generations so that they would eventually be light enough to fly. This makes absolutely no sense and is beyond ridiculous.

#29 If dinosaurs really are tens of millions of years old, why have scientists found dinosaur bones with soft tissue still in them? The following is from an NBC News report about one of these discoveries…

For more than a century, the study of dinosaurs has been limited to fossilized bones. Now, researchers have recovered 70 million-year-old soft tissue, including what may be blood vessels and cells, from a Tyrannosaurus rex.

#30 Which evolved first: blood, the heart, or the blood vessels for the blood to travel through?
#26 How can we explain the creation of new informa... (show quote)


26. Animals don't turn into other animals. That is a misconception.

27. Any geologist would differ with you, even the ones who dig up ancient ruins from biblical times

28. No animal develops anything to do anything. They change and its an advantage or not. I do believe dinosaurs had hollow bones and birds evolved from dino's.

29. Amazing, isn't it??

30. It all evolved concurrently, gradually.

Reply
Jan 27, 2018 11:38:43   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Peter, I am a person of faith but not a fundamentalist. I don't take the Bible literally. It just doesn't click with what I know about science and reality. I believe the Bible is a great guide for behavior, but the creation story of the Old Testament just can't be true in a literal sense. God gave us intelligence so that we can reason. I think we should use this God given gift which separates us with all other living things.
PeterS wrote:
So are you saying that we shouldn't believe what we read in the bible?

Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6The LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart. 7The LORD said, "I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land, from man to animals to creeping things and to birds of the sky; for I am sorry that I have made them."

To me that sounds like he is pissed and wants to destroy what he created. If what he did was a baptism it is like one I have never heard of before...
So are you saying that we shouldn't believe what w... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 27, 2018 12:10:37   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
26. Animals don't turn into other animals. That is a misconception.

27. Any geologist would differ with you, even the ones who dig up ancient ruins from biblical times

28. No animal develops anything to do anything. They change and its an advantage or not. I do believe dinosaurs had hollow bones and birds evolved from dino's.

29. Amazing, isn't it??

30. It all evolved concurrently, gradually.


Fair enough....if that's what you'd prefer to believe....other than #26, which we both agree on.

#31-35:

#31 Which evolved first: the mouth, the stomach, the digestive fluids, or the ability to poop?

#32 Which evolved first: the windpipe, the lungs, or the ability of the body to use oxygen?

#33 Which evolved first: the bones, ligaments, tendons, blood supply, or the muscles to move the bones?

#34 In order for blood to clot, more than 20 complex steps need to successfully be completed. How in the world did that process possibly evolve?

#35 DNA is so incredibly complex that it is absolutely absurd to suggest that such a language system could have “evolved” all by itself by accident…

When it comes to storing massive amounts of information, nothing comes close to the efficiency of DNA. A single strand of DNA is thousands of times thinner than a strand of human hair. One pinhead of DNA could hold enough information to fill a stack of books stretching from the earth to the moon 500 times.

Although DNA is wound into tight coils, your cells can quickly access, copy, and t***slate the information stored in DNA. DNA even has a built-in proofreader and spell-checker that ensure precise copying. Only about one mistake slips through for every 10 billion nucleotides that are copied.

Reply
Jan 31, 2018 15:17:59   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Peter, I am a person of faith but not a fundamentalist. I don't take the Bible literally. It just doesn't click with what I know about science and reality. I believe the Bible is a great guide for behavior, but the creation story of the Old Testament just can't be true in a literal sense. God gave us intelligence so that we can reason. I think we should use this God given gift which separates us with all other living things.


saltwind; how can you have faith in godless C*******m?
The atrocities committed by C*******ts under c*******m should be warning to you. That goes for F*****m also.

Reply
Feb 2, 2018 17:53:40   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Peter, I agree. If there is an afterlife, I'll deal with it.
PeterS wrote:
I think I will become what I was before I was born. If I didn't exist for the eternity before I was born to not exist for the eternity after will be no different.

Yes, poof I am gone!

Reply
Feb 4, 2018 10:15:13   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
A Question That Atheist/Evolutionist Couldn't Answer(13 min) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiJdfCiWo4I

Reply
Page <<first <prev 68 of 68
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.