Did They really ThinkThis Man Was Going To Cooperate After Disrespect (You Lie!!) Trying to Repeal ObamaCare 50 Times and Being General Obstructionists? Puleeze... (Page 2): You don't...

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

KHH1 wrote:

I don't give a damn what it sounds like...that is fact not emotion....obstruction my azz......they had it in for Pres. Obama as soon as they experienced "guess who's coming to dinner?" at the White House....obstruction and straight disrespect for the office of POTUS....

You don't need any proof of r****m other than someone disagreeing with an African American - and with that definition you too are a r****t.

Antisocialist Loc: Florida

KHH1 wrote:

Since you are name calling unprovoked like a little b***h i'll just disegard that post....you need to learn communication sk**ls...so tired of ignorant azz fools.......

Yeah, I get it, you are unable to respond to facts.

That usually does end the conversation with any Libtard.

KHH1

Dave wrote:

By your definition of leaders, Mao and Stalin and Castro et al are real leaders -

As to v****g, Congress too was elected -

As to "our" agenda - if you mean the agenda of those who were elected to Congress, the answer to why he should bend (called compromise in some places) is something called the Constitution.

Hitler was a leader also...but compromise does not mean give your presidency up to people who want a conservative Dem...not going to happen and I don't blame him....but it is like black conservatives...the right loves obedience...no matter who it is from...

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

KHH1 wrote:

Hitler was a leader also...but compromise does not mean give your presidency up to people who want a conservative Dem...not going to happen and I don't blame him....but it is like black conservatives...the right loves obedience...no matter who it is from...

Compromise is the difference from leaders like Hitler and leaders like past American presidents -

..and you've made it clear more than once - a person who is black and conservative is displaying the unacceptable behavior of a person with that skin color - and you somehow twist that into obedience - while you are totally obedient in displaying the political ideology assigned to your skin color.

KHH1

MrEd wrote:

It's not OUR agenda we are talking about, it is the agenda of our Constitution that is supposed to be the law of the land. You know, that little piece of paper that has all those funny words on it that you do not understand? The one that obama is constantly ignoring.

The President does NOT have the authority to approve any treaty by himself, Congress does that. The President can get a treaty make between our country and another, but it is Congress that approves it, not the President. Until that treaty is approved, it is not binding on this country or our government.

Now there are some treaties that fly through Congress and get their approval fast and are made law, but some are rejected and others are changed before they are approved. That is what Congress is for, or one of them anyway.

For any President to sign and pretend that it is law is violating the Constitution and by-passing Congress and it is NOT law no matter what the President says.

Unless Hillary is our next President, it will get thrown out as soon as they are sworn in to office. Our Congress does not like this deal and it is not good for us OR the country. It sure as hell is not good for Israel and will only get a bunch of people k**led, but as long as they are not muslims, obama does not care and especially if it is Israel that gets wiped out he won't care.

Now you may not like Israel and that is your right, but to want them all k**led is not even in your agenda is it?? I can't see any people that are so bad that every one of them should be wiped out, but that is what Iran wants to do to the Jews.

Iran may not be able to send a nuke all the way here with anything they have now, but they may in 10 years or so. But even if they don't get that, they can still smuggle a nuke into our country and set it off in say NYC. How many people are you willing to k**l here in this country just to give obama his stupid treaty? You have to remember one thing. That border is still wide open and more then just Mexicans are coming across it.

It's not OUR agenda we are talking about, it is th... (show quote)

Duh...the man is a Constitutional Law Professor...I know to you that means one still does not know s**t that they have studied and taught...but newsflash...remember when ObamaCare was challenged on that basis? I understand...i have taught Ph.D.'s before and i'm still a dumb f-k who is telling lies according to many of you...oh if I could only get the naysayers in an academic setting...but I am saying, what Pres Obama is doing may be unpopular but i doubt like hell if he misunderstands the Constitution or is doing anything illegal....a supreme insult attempt if you ask me.....he even said that many of the things he has done can be overturned...but if it is popular to America as a majority...you'll be f-ked for doing so...and nthat bisnwhy the Speaker runs from the nright....because he knows the right nwill scuttle the ship if not allowed to be the Captain...he knows that and Obama knows that...matter of fact he wants you all to overturn things once he is gone...political suicide and a great future for Dems....and by the way...N. Korea acquired nukes on W's watch and even threatened that they could reach the US...why the selective outrage NOW for someone who does not even have them? You all know the reason and I do not have to say it...it is like in here...when you hold others to task unlike how you hold your own...it boils down to one thing...because it is illogical and unfair..........

KHH1

Dave wrote:

Well, I'm guessing you thought those Dem's who were all for it were also conservatives - and surely the Obama surge in Afghanistan came from his inner conservative self.

Nope.....he capitalized on the fear from 9-11 to make a connection between that and Iraq....which resulted in anyone being against it deemed unpatriotic........that was simple to see...

KHH1

Dave wrote:

Compromise is the difference from leaders like Hitler and leaders like past American presidents -

..and you've made it clear more than once - a person who is black and conservative is displaying the unacceptable behavior of a person with that skin color - and you somehow twist that into obedience - while you are totally obedient in displaying the political ideology assigned to your skin color.

That is okay....you can make it a solely race thing...but when one cannot logically explain why they are now against what benefitted them....they either a) have psychological issues or b) have sold their soul for oersonal gain...ever notice how black conservatives are rewarded by the right...they have a black face to put on r****t white thought...which exonerates the r****t....

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

KHH1 wrote:

Nope.....he capitalized on the fear from 9-11 to make a connection between that and Iraq....which resulted in anyone being against it deemed unpatriotic........that was simple to see...

I see, W did it because he was a conservatives but Dem's went along because they wanted to appear patriotic -

...still leaving Obama a conservative for the surge in Afghanistan.

I guess one can rationalize wh**ever they care to in order to keep their minds focused on the proper ideology that has been assigned to them

KHH1

Dave wrote:

You don't need any proof of r****m other than someone disagreeing with an African American - and with that definition you too are a r****t.

Nope....it is r****m when the same situation is handled differently with a black than it is for a white, especially if the treatment for a black is deemed more punitive in nature....it is like how you all try to admonish me for what I say but never have s**t to say to your own for even worse things....you all are clearly r****t in that regard...and not one gives a f-k, but don't insult my intelligence as if i am unaware of what is t***spiring......

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

KHH1 wrote:

That is okay....you can make it a solely race thing...but when one cannot logically explain why they are now against what benefitted them....they either a) have psychological issues or b) have sold their soul for oersonal gain...ever notice how black conservatives are rewarded by the right...they have a black face to put on r****t white thought...which exonerates the r****t....

You call out them out for being t*****rs to their race and then accuse me of making it a race thing - interesting

I've read quite a bit of Drs. Williams and Sowell, and found them more than slightly logical and fail to see them come out against anything that benefits minorities. I see where they may disagree with many on the left in what is a benefit vs a curse - and always with plenty of factual information supporting their conclusions.

I'm not sure how you think they've been rewarded any more for their ideology than Sharpton, Jackson and many other liberal Democrats were rewarded for theirs.

Further, I've never seen anything written by them that exonerates r****m and doubt that you have either. I do understand that they say things that cause you discomfort but have not yet seen any solid argument against what they say

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

KHH1 wrote:

Nope....it is r****m when the same situation is handled differently with a black than it is for a white, especially if the treatment for a black is deemed more punitive in nature....it is like how you all try to admonish me for what I say but never have s**t to say to your own for even worse things....you all are clearly r****t in that regard...and not one gives a f-k, but don't insult my intelligence as if i am unaware of what is t***spiring......

I disagree with what you say many times - and to you that means I admonish you?

It is r****m when a person's ideology is assigned him based on his skin color - when a black is called derogatory names for holding an opinion some feel inappropriate for b****s to hold. I do not support such treatment for any opinion any black may have - I do not demand his skin color dictate his politics - which any logical person would conclude I am less of a r****t than you.

..as to what you are or are not aware of - you do not possess absolute knowledge and authority on any subject, including the subject of r****m and the proper political requirement based on a man's skin color.

WhosetheBoss Loc: Arkansas

KHH1 wrote:

See you people need to realize that leaders do not care what people think of them...followers do....the American economy is leading the world right now and had the strongest recovery....Dems are happy with him and that is who v**ed him in...none of you people talking s**t v**ed for him in the first place so why should he bend to your agenda?.....

He may be a democrat in name, but in theory he is the executive representative of all the people, so he is required to know how the other side see's things whether he likes it or not.

Better watch what you preach, for if Obama is justified in ignoring conservatives, what you going to do when the next white president decides there is so much black crime, we will just lock them all up without trial. We conservatives will have a hell of a laugh then and when you whine we will just turn the other way and say we don't care you didn't elect us anyway. That is the big problem you will one day face, all the precedence Obama sets will not always be in a black democrats control.

jelun

Dave wrote:

Obama had minimal contact with Democrats in Congress -

Meanwhile, the "you lie" and the Obamacare repeal v**es were done in the House, not the Senate.

Finally, the Constitution of the USA does not allow for hurt feelings as an excuse to ignore the elected representatives in Congress any more than it allows for hurt feelings as an excuse to ignore the executive branch.

The "YOU LIE!" was at a joint session, the delivery of the State of the Union address.
You are absolutely correct, however, that it is just plain immature for the Republicans to ignore the Executive Branch which has asked repeatedly to work together with Congress on the economy and immigration, on tweaking healthcare...

KHH1

Dave wrote:

You call out them out for being t*****rs to their ... (show quote)

I'll explain this one last time:

First dont assign me weak ass emotions. If things like death and major accomplishments did not cause me anger, discomfort and all that emotionally weak s**tnothing else willmaybe YOU are like that and think others are like you but that is Not the case here.

They are t*****rs to their racethe benefited from policies that had to be specifically designed to benefit black peopleI did not make it a race issue, your country had to because it was more f-ked then up then than it is now. Do the research and see where policies were enacted that aided their entry into the professional/academic world. It was not because they were dumb (r****ts like to imply AA candidates are inferior, although many AA candidates like myself graduated at the top over many others) because policy had to get them the OPPORTUNITY that was not there previouslyperiod. There is nothing logical about a black person aiding others in repealing policies THEY benefitted from and denying other b****s the same opportunity they had. I am talking about measurable results such as decreased college enrollment and professional inclusion in various sectors. They benefitted from the efforts of the collective and then turn their back on the collective for personal gain. There is nothing logical about that but plenty psychological (r****ts convinced them they should have a stigma because policy was necessary in a r****t country). Otherwise they are some selfish f-ks who should forgo the benefits gained from the civil rights movement and live under jim crow rules in 2015there is nothing you can tell me otherwise because they cannot even address the logic of such actionsknowing they are being driven by other factors

Trooper745 Loc: Carolina

KHH1 wrote:

Nope...he is not running a conservative Presidency and I do not blame him.....because when it fails like it did for W, he will be the fall guy...ain't happening...and the name is President Barack H. Obama....

See, right there, is where you go off on the silly rhetoric. The Bush presidency was going very well, until you l*****t fools went to the polls, and screwed everything up by electing more democrats to congress. They wouldn't compromise, and that caused all the problems we now have.