KHH1

Laura Ingraham calls for Obama impeachment
Famous talker says prez going rogue on Iran nuke deal
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/conservative-rock-star-calls-for-obama-impeachment/#2wzuSmll1Zdz1htl.99
Conservative radio rock star Laura Ingraham had some harsh words for President Obama over his emerging nuclear deal with Tehran, saying the White House leader was taking matters way too far into his own hands and that Congress ought to consider stepping in and stopping him – and even impeaching him.
She made the fiery remarks during an “On the Record” interview with Greta Van Susteren on Fox News.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/conservative-rock-star-calls-for-obama-impeachment/#2wzuSmll1Zdz1htl.99
She said, the Hill reported: The Senate needs to consider “extreme measures” to halt Team Obama from negotiating by itself, absent congressional oversight, with Iran.
And then she raised the “I word,” impeachment.
“MSNBC and all of these others [will say] she mentioned the ‘I word.’ All I will say is, if there is a consensus in Congress that this is one of the most critical national security issues we will face, and he doesn’t go to Congress, then you can just throw up your hands and say the Constitution doesn’t mean anything, or you write a letter, you put public pressure on him,” Ingraham said. “Or you have to consider your ‘I word’ alternative.”
Ingraham’s comments come as 47 Republican senators sent the White House a letter – which was basically an open letter to Iran – warning that any nuclear deal struck between the United States and Tehran was subject to change under the next administration. The White House expressed outrage with the letter, accusing Republicans of undermining the president during a crucial stage of negotiations with the Iranian regime.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/conservative-rock-star-calls-for-obama-impeachment/#2wzuSmll1Zdz1htl.99

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Simple explanation.... You should have figured this out without me having to walk you through it.

The reason Conservatives want Obama to fail because when he succeeds he screws America. Examples are his surrendering to ISIS, making healthcare less affordable with Obamacare, diminishing our standing with our allies, making us look week worldwide.. Etc...

The reason he doesn't work with Conservatives is Two-Fold.
1) He doesn't lower himself to the constitutional limits of the POTUS.
2) He knows Conservatives don't want to help him ruin America.

So endeth the lesson.

KHH1

Nope...that is a lie....we all know the REAL reason...because they said that BEFORE the first Inauguration....

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

You're saying you were surprised by Obama's successes that screwed America?

Apparently they're smarter than you.

Me too. We all saw it coming...

KHH1

Where did I say that?

Ve'hoe

Because he is a failure,,,, and he is looking for an excuse,,,, kind of like you...

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

OK. I stand corrected.

I just assumed that if you knew Obama was planning to screw America's international standing, healthcare system, and internal security that you'd oppose him.

My mistake.

Ve'hoe

Nope, that is the "troof" ,,,,,what you said was a lie,,,, simply because YOU made it up,,, therefore its veracity is suspect...

Ve'hoe

He did ask, but as dumb as the man is, it is doubtful that he understood what he was talking about, much less what you were.

Just an observation on khhzero.........

KHH1

Don't assume...you know the saying...........

Ve'hoe

He did ask that question in his title,,, a typical practice of his, where he states the question then posts pseudo related cut and paste garbage and then claims the other side said it,,,,

Then he sits and snipes and argues, name calls, and gets angry,,, but is rarely effective,,,,

KHH1

No...you have the whore emotions...i do not.....the articles are from CON websites...man you people are slow...I have said numerous times that I do so in order to not have material dismissed as l*****t...If it is from myour side, you have to embrace it with a degree of validity...triangulation...don't make me have to say this again...reading is fundamental...

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

True.

I guess when he got his doctorate in debate techniques, "Stompy Foot" was in vogue.

Ve'hoe

Not "triangulation" nor is it "we" who are slow,,,

You did indeed ask the question in the title of your post...

Then spent your first argument,,, where none was warranted or initiated,,,, denying that you did.

Then you resort to name calling,,, based on emotions that no one showed,, except you. And it doesnt matter how many times you "said before" anything,,, since it was wrong then, it is wrong now!!!

Triangulation: Definitions

a. In the field of psychology, triangulations are necessary steps in the child's development when a two-party relationship is opened up by a third party into a new form of relationship. So the child gains new mental abilities. That certainly fits, ,,, child development,, all but the development, that is..

b. Math/trig,,, nah forget that, where you are concerned....


c. Poltics: involves adopting for oneself some of the ideas of one's political opponent (or apparent opponent). The logic behind it is that it both takes credit for the opponent's ideas, and insulates the triangulator from attacks on that particular issue. Except you deny that you adopted those views,,,

d. Social sciences: Triangulation is often used to indicate that two (or more) methods are used in a study in order to check the results. The idea is that one can be more confident with a result if different methods lead to the same result.
Definitely not your tact here,,,,, because you dont know what your position is,,, or was, or will be... and cannot explain it if we actually gave it to you...

So,,, since everything you said has been debunked,,, again,,,,, which methodology were you improperly using, so that I had to come in again, and tell you how dumb you are being?????

You started calling names,,, I just proved you were incorrect, again,,,, and you got your tiny wittle feewing hurt-ed!!

HAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAAHHAAAAAAAAAAA

That was fun..

Ve'hoe

So was anal retention,,,, which is what he did,, when he intellectually "filled his pants"... what is likely next,,, as with most lower primates, is that he will fling his fecal matter/brains/intellect at us, with his hand........