Judge Blocks Obama's Amnesty Order (Page 2): I hope you understand I'm not completely serious. I'm mainly just venting a feeling.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Mollypitcher1 wrote:

Why not? Sounds good to me!

I hope you understand I'm not completely serious. I'm mainly just venting a feeling.

Mollypitcher1

LAPhil wrote:

I hope you understand I'm not completely serious. I'm mainly just venting a feeling.

No "qualifications" necessary. We all get a bit "tart" from time to time.

Antisocialist Loc: Florida

Kevyn wrote:

Just watch what happens, this time bend over drop your pants and watch with your only good eye.

You are beyond stupid.

Your first post made it sound as though you only wanted to see rulings that followed US law and our Constitution. Now you want a ruling that defies US law and our Constitution but backs Obama's lawless executive orders.

Do you r****ds ever listen to the s**t that come out of your mouths?

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Here is a link to the text of Justice Hanen's ruling. It's 100 pages if anyone wants to tackle it. There is some juicy stuff in there.

Justice Hanen pulled no punches in his ruling

Definitely not in any way is this "judicial activism". Anyone who thinks it is is completely ignorant of the rule of law in our country.

The most infamous example of judicial activism would be Justice Robert's ruling that Obamacare is a tax. That was not only reprehensible, it was damn near treasonous.

silvereagle

If congress doesn't fund the i*****l i*********n it dies on the vine.Simple. Where would he get the money for this?

Kevyn

Antisocialist wrote:

You are beyond stupid.

Your first post made it sound as though you only wanted to see rulings that followed US law and our Constitution. Now you want a ruling that defies US law and our Constitution but backs Obama's lawless executive orders.

Do you r****ds ever listen to the s**t that come out of your mouths?

How the president administers departments is entirely up to him, he sets his prioritys within the law. His executive orders are no different than a police chief deciding what road to patrol. Your head is filled with a bunch of nonsense pumped there by propagandists and repeated right wing nutters.

She Wolf Loc: Currently Georgia

Since both parties do not care what the people want, I am afraid they are only giving lip service to stopping this invasion. We have laws on the books. No other country in the world allows entry in this manner.

I do not want my tax dollars used in social programs for i******s. I would like to help Americans. We have allowed the government of Mexico to rid itself of it's criminals. Send them back and stop all aid and trade with Mexico until such time as they assists in border control. Problem solved.

bylm1-Bernie

Kevyn wrote:

How the president administers departments is entirely up to him, he sets his prioritys within the law. His executive orders are no different than a police chief deciding what road to patrol. Your head is filled with a bunch of nonsense pumped there by propagandists and repeated right wing nutters.

Kevyn, there is just no other way to say it. You are full of s**t. The prosecutorial discretion applies only to not deporting those i*****l a***ns immediately or delaying their departure. It does not extend to the benefits that Obama was going to give them such as driver's licenses or any other benefits that he has been known to illegally bestow on i*****l a***ns. That is not to say that he may not find a way to get around it. We have to remember that we are dealing with a Chicago politician and they have been experts at pulling off all kinds of illegal stuff such as registering v**ers at the cemetery. We're keeping our fingers crossed.

robmull Loc: florida

JMHO wrote:

Pot/kettle!!!! But activist libtard judges who rule politically are okay???!!!! GD moron!

T***h has nothing to do with demonrats and liberal progressive ideology, JMHO, and to argue with a "libtard," is like "playing chess with a pigeon" [Putin].

lfdavis Loc: Alabama

Kevyn wrote:

Just watch what happens, this time bend over drop your pants and watch with your only good eye.

Nice emotional, non-intellectual reply -- typical liberal pablum.

lfdavis Loc: Alabama

Kevyn wrote:

How the president administers departments is entirely up to him, he sets his prioritys within the law. His executive orders are no different than a police chief deciding what road to patrol. Your head is filled with a bunch of nonsense pumped there by propagandists and repeated right wing nutters.

But he doesn't get to create the law, and THEN set his priority.

"What a maroon!" -- B. Bunny.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Blade_Runner wrote:

Here is a link to the text of Justice Hanen's ruli... (show quote)

Great post. :thumbup: Isn't it refreshing to finally know there's a judge who has his head on straight? I'll bet that took some of the wind out of Obama's sails. Judge Andrew Napolitano on Fox News yesterday said that he thinks it's more likely than not the ruling will hold up.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Kevyn wrote:

How the president administers departments is entirely up to him, he sets his prioritys within the law. His executive orders are no different than a police chief deciding what road to patrol. Your head is filled with a bunch of nonsense pumped there by propagandists and repeated right wing nutters.

The bottom line is "within the law". Obama went outside the law when he issued work permits to i*****l a***ns.

chuck slusser

you who want to shoot them all ...will get your chance, sooner than you would like,,,you can bet your ass on it....LETS NOT FORGET THAT THE MEXICAN-AMERICAN WAR HAS BEEN A WORK IN PROGRESS SINCE THE ALAMO, Texas 150 years ago(more or less). I have family photo's of the IOWA NATIONAL GUARD,,AT E L PASO TEXAS 1917 ...in one, a family member as part of a firing squad doing what firing squads do....if I can figure out how to, I will post them....

richard0135 Loc: little rock, arkansas

Kevyn wrote:

Another activist republican judge acting politically rather than following the law and constitution, he will be quickly overturned.

Of course, if the same Judge had ruled for the president, then he would not then be activist: RIGHT!!!