More Right-Wing Hysteria and Conspiracy Theories (Page 3): I never disagreed with you, you reactionary jerk-off. Now tell me, how much is enough? How much public treasure and lives...

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

JMHO wrote:

Ok asshole, if you don't put ground troops over there to stop them, get ready for them to expand, more atrocities, and eventually be in your back yard. If you're not going to use the military, why do we have a military? And, BTW, I am retired military, pal...that's their job. Wake up jerk off!!!!!

I never disagreed with you, you reactionary jerk-off. Now tell me, how much is enough? How much public treasure and lives wasted? How much is enough?

Artemis

jelun wrote:

Yes, apparently he is.
He just doesn't understand that the problem is that President Bush had to do the AFU thing to destroy the containment method of control.
Now anytime it APPEARS that things are under control the US has to keep spening BILLIONS because that climate ruins equipment to keep a hundred thousand troops there or some other group will grow to fill the hole left by the last group.
It is not our problem, or would not be if we got smart and turned to sustainable energy.

I believe the word sustainable is the key word here, not profitable enough for them.

jelun

J Anthony wrote:

No, you're the t*****r. As a h**eful ignoramus full of stubborn, ignorant bulls**t-p***e that you call "patriotism", you are helping to divide the public and bring the country down. Either make a positive contribution, say something intelligent, or go off yourself troll-boy.

Face it, J Anthony, none of us is influencing anyone from here.
That person may be boosting the h**ers of American here on OPP.
Everyone, including his family, sees him and the rest for what they are. They are impotent, angry, frightened guys who were good for nothing but booby trap fodder as young men and continue with that. Except, of course, that now they are not even good for that.
Look at how they play "I'm a vet, you're a vet" it is all they ever had.
Pretending that an experience like being a tunnel rat in Nam gives them some special knowledge beyond the horror of friends and enemies dying is just plain stupid and yet they have to cling to that. Otherwise they have nothing, what is that name of that puny little area of Louisiana? Bayou Pigeon?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayou_Pigeon,_Louisiana

jelun

Artemis wrote:

I believe the word sustainable is the key word here, not profitable enough for them.

No doubt, I am not sure why our families should pay for that... in the midst of the tragedy that is the American Sniper trial balanced against the movie it is unspeakable that people wish to return to that region in battle mode.

jelun

J Anthony wrote:

I never disagreed with you, you reactionary jerk-off. Now tell me, how much is enough? How much public treasure and lives wasted? How much is enough?

Our treasure doesn't matter to a military man who totally misconstrues the reason to have a military.
Since when is having the best system in the world to wage war? Putting troops in the field is failure, the purpose of a strong defense system is to pressure others to negotiate.
Our strong military is leverage.

The Messenger Loc: Every where

I agree that murderous fanatics of any kind need to be wiped out completely. But just going in there all-out is not going to solve the problem...there will be repurcussions. As long as we continue to occupy and manipulate that region, there will be groups that form to fight us, assuring that the Pentagon and our military always have something to do. It's all madness, and at root is about money and power, as usual. At this point no one is blameless. You can't keep poking a hornet's nest then act surprised when you get stung.[/quote]

We no longer "occupy or manipulate that region". Your nitwit president took care of that. And that is the problem!

jelun

The Messenger wrote:

I agree that murderous fanatics of any kind need t... (show quote)

Quote:

We no longer "occupy or manipulate that region". Your nitwit president took care of that. And that is the problem!

Your suggestion would be to continue to occupy a sovereign nation without that nation's agreement?
That would be an (other) act of war.
It is hard to fathom, I know, but the US doesn't have the right to just take over every foreign entity we want to control.

KHH1

DamnYANKEE wrote:

Hey Look . Kuntas Out on BAIL :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I see you are on your period today...as usual.....you ought to be out of blood by now........

JMHO Loc: Utah

J Anthony wrote:

I never disagreed with you, you reactionary jerk-off. Now tell me, how much is enough? How much public treasure and lives wasted? How much is enough?

Well, how many are enough when they get to our soil?

JMHO Loc: Utah

jelun wrote:

Our treasure doesn't matter to a military man who totally misconstrues the reason to have a military.
Since when is having the best system in the world to wage war? Putting troops in the field is failure, the purpose of a strong defense system is to pressure others to negotiate.
Our strong military is leverage.

Moron Alert!!!!! YOU DON'T KNOW JACK S**T ABOUT THE MILITARY NITWIT!!!!!!

jelun

JMHO wrote:

Moron Alert!!!!! YOU DON'T KNOW JACK S**T ABOUT THE MILITARY NITWIT!!!!!!

I would say it is you who understands nothing about diplomacy, how that melds with a strong military, or what the world needs from the military.
It doesn't matter how many exclamation points you use. Your supposed knowledge is not tactical and neither is it comprehensive.

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

The Messenger wrote:

I agree that murderous fanatics of any kind need t... (show quote)

We no longer "occupy or manipulate that region". Your nitwit president took care of that. And that is the problem![/quote]

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

The Messenger wrote:

I agree that murderous fanatics of any kind need t... (show quote)

We no longer "occupy or manipulate that region". Your nitwit president took care of that. And that is the problem![/quote]

Another reactionary in denial of reality. Get lost.

JMHO Loc: Utah

jelun wrote:

I would say it is you who understands nothing about diplomacy, how that melds with a strong military, or what the world needs from the military.
It doesn't matter how many exclamation points you use. Your supposed knowledge is not tactical and neither is it comprehensive.

Like I said, you jack s**t about the military...period. You never served, and your colossal ignorance shows. Dumber than a bag of hammers!!!!!!!!!!!

KHH1

JMHO wrote:

Moron Alert!!!!! YOU DON'T KNOW JACK S**T ABOUT THE MILITARY NITWIT!!!!!!

you should tell him what he does not know instead of talking schit........