Repeal Land Zoning and Land Use Laws.
Land use and zoning laws are unconstitutional abrogations and expropriations of property rights. They are a key part of the communization of a country as proposed by Karl Marx in The Manifesto.
Unfortunately, they have been around so long that even Republicans and conservatives have forgotten what it was like before they were permitted under a Supreme Court decision; a previous Supreme Court had ruled them unconstitutional.
Their purpose is to preserve and develop community character. Malls and Big Box stores attest to that success. They arise not in spite of zoning laws but because of them. They confirm the adage that government never does anything right and will always achieve the precise opposite of anything it tries to do.
They are anachronisms in the world of freedom and should all be outlawed.
crazylibertarian wrote:
Land use and zoning laws are unconstitutional abrogations and expropriations of property rights. They are a key part of the communization of a country as proposed by Karl Marx in The Manifesto.
Unfortunately, they have been around so long that even Republicans and conservatives have forgotten what it was like before they were permitted under a Supreme Court decision; a previous Supreme Court had ruled them unconstitutional.
Their purpose is to preserve and develop community character. Malls and Big Box stores attest to that success. They arise not in spite of zoning laws but because of them. They confirm the adage that government never does anything right and will always achieve the precise opposite of anything it tries to do.
They are anachronisms in the world of freedom and should all be outlawed.
Land use and zoning laws are unconstitutional abro... (
show quote)
So if your neighbor wants to put in a tire burning facility you are fine with it?
Kevyn wrote:
So if your neighbor wants to put in a tire burning facility you are fine with it?
H**e to admit it, you're right.
But wait, there's more:
Only a unified religious and moral people are able to live in freedom and not destroy each other.
The further this country gets away from this principle, the more the need for government oversight and control.
crazylibertarian wrote:
Land use and zoning laws are unconstitutional abrogations and expropriations of property rights. They are a key part of the communization of a country as proposed by Karl Marx in The Manifesto.
Unfortunately, they have been around so long that even Republicans and conservatives have forgotten what it was like before they were permitted under a Supreme Court decision; a previous Supreme Court had ruled them unconstitutional.
Their purpose is to preserve and develop community character. Malls and Big Box stores attest to that success. They arise not in spite of zoning laws but because of them. They confirm the adage that government never does anything right and will always achieve the precise opposite of anything it tries to do.
They are anachronisms in the world of freedom and should all be outlawed.
Land use and zoning laws are unconstitutional abro... (
show quote)
================
Rediculous! Logic dictates that land usage should be determined by its suitability and function for the neighborhood, and there are many types of neighborhoods, from city to suburbs, to rural, to roadsides, etc. Not only would I not want a tire factory next to my home, neither would I want a six-story building there, or a parking lot, or a pig farm. Or many other obnoxious items that might creep in. Hence, Land Use and Zoning Laws protect me from such value-destroying events. This legal protection extends to building codes for structures to be built in given types of zones. Thus, I will not see the house next door razed to build a restaurant, or even adapted as it stands for that purpose.
Kevyn wrote:
So if your neighbor wants to put in a tire burning facility you are fine with it?
🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Kevyn wrote:
So if your neighbor wants to put in a tire burning facility you are fine with it?
Lots of those around...... ain't there?
I'm willing to risk it.
Kevyn wrote:
So if your neighbor wants to put in a tire burning facility you are fine with it?
My property May become more valuable selling tires. Are you fine with a mall being built next to you as does happen now.
I don't want government to have that power. As Benjamin Franklin said, those who would trade freedom for security get neither.
The usage of other nearby properties usually influence what your own property is used for. Many other factors go into such a decision. For instance, I would never want to live near you.
crazylibertarian wrote:
My property May become more valuable selling tires. Are you fine with a mall being built next to you as does happen now.
I don't want government to have that power. As Benjamin Franklin said, those who would trade freedom for security get neither.
================
Fortunately, the land use and zoning laws are in effect where I live, and I seriously doubt it will change in this era. So, the laws or no laws argument is a tempest in a teapot for me!
manning5me wrote:
================
Fortunately, the land use and zoning laws are in effect where I live, and I seriously doubt it will change in this era. So, the laws or no laws argument is a tempest in a teapot for me!
It's one of the most basic assaults on our freedom in the effort to communize a country. Other always follow. Government is never satisfied with it power and, inevitably it will expand in to other area, if only citing its power in
supervising land us.
And what makes you so sure that with a little greasing that some huge Big Box or store won't be allowed onyou block.
Beware of any government power.
crazylibertarian wrote:
It's one of the most basic assaults on our freedom in the effort to communize a country. Other always follow. Government is never satisfied with it power and, inevitably it will expand in to other area, if only citing its power in
supervising land us.
And what makes you so sure that with a little greasing that some huge Big Box or store won't be allowed onyou block.
Beware of any government power.
===============
For now, it works both ways. They need the acceptance of the existing residents, 2/3rds of them. or maybe all of them, I think, to obtain permission to do anything. That ain't happening here!
( I needed an excuse to use ain't, and you gave me one, thanks!)
Kevyn wrote:
So if your neighbor wants to put in a tire burning facility you are fine with it?
Everyone should understand, liberals despise everyone who disagrees with them and, likely, also most who agree with them. They despise humanity. That's the way for liberals. They don't think you should have the right to do anything unless government, i.e they, approve it.
The best determinant of land use, like everything else is the free market, which they also despise. Zoning & land use laws are inefficient for the complexities of making that determination. They stifle the human imagination for solving the problems of urban overcrowding by, for example, building upward. Instead, we have urban and suburban sprawl with over-reliance on automobiles and the resultant air pollution.
So the next time you sit at a red light, choking with your eyes smarting from the vehicle exhausts around you, thank the zoning law bureaucrats with their archaic, inflexible zoning laws.
I actually like the zoning laws of Toronto better than the US. It plans for dense housing and apartments so people can stay in their neighborhoods.
crazylibertarian wrote:
Everyone should understand, liberals despise everyone who disagrees with them and, likely, also most who agree with them. They despise humanity. That's the way for liberals. They don't think you should have the right to do anything unless government, i.e they, approve it.
The best determinant of land use, like everything else is the free market, which they also despise. Zoning & land use laws are inefficient for the complexities of making that determination. They stifle the human imagination for solving the problems of urban overcrowding by, for example, building upward. Instead, we have urban and suburban sprawl with over-reliance on automobiles and the resultant air pollution.
So the next time you sit at a red light, choking with your eyes smarting from the vehicle exhausts around you, thank the zoning law bureaucrats with their archaic, inflexible zoning laws.
Everyone should understand, liberals despise every... (
show quote)
The free market, which no longer exists, if it ever did. would bring the big biz to place any facility it wished in any area it wanted.. your home, gone and replaced by a junk dealer. Or that always wanted tire disposal. or that missed timber treatment facility..
Without the protection of zoning, our lives would be lived in the sewers of runoff from business waste..
Have to ask, did you get rejected from building a out of zone business? Perhaps a lively bar in the heart of residential area?? So all the little kids can enjoy the ambiance of drunks and fight every night of the week as you try to have them attack homework rather then each other...
permafrost wrote:
The free market, which no longer exists, if it ever did. would bring the big biz to place any facility it wished in any area it wanted.. your home, gone and replaced by a junk dealer. Or that always wanted tire disposal. or that missed timber treatment facility..
Without the protection of zoning, our lives would be lived in the sewers of runoff from business waste..
Have to ask, did you get rejected from building a out of zone business? Perhaps a lively bar in the heart of residential area?? So all the little kids can enjoy the ambiance of drunks and fight every night of the week as you try to have them attack homework rather then each other...
The free market, which no longer exists, if it eve... (
show quote)
====================
A few thoughts:
1. Land Use and Zoning Laws protect my property from devaluation by allowing a next-door neighbor to deface his property somehow.
2. The city I live in, Richmond, VA. runs a very sharp Zoning Commission, with some really talented individuals as members. I have been before them twice for various issues.
3. Yes, I won my issues!
4. The greatest problem I have is with the misuse of Emanant Domain to seize property and offer far less for it than the market would afford to the owner. And, to make it even more d********g, to turn the property over to a commercial venture of some kind. Both factors are against the law, but corruption is where you find it.
5. The variation on that move out west has been well-publicized, where government people have tried to appropriate key pieces of land, only to be met with armed resistors, including the landowners, that I believe lost in the end.
6. Then we have the government people that have the power to declare your watering hole to be inadequate or polluted or inappropriate for its location or what have you. You must comply with their demands or you lose the property!
7. On and on it goes with big battles and small ones, and the smell of bad money and corrupt people is often hovering over it all. We have 50 sovereign states and thousands of counties and cities where these kinds of maneuvers are taking place every day of the year. How can we solve this?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.