Republicans want you to have over six children
Feb 28, 2024 13:52:31 #
RascalRiley wrote:
Your definition of ‘liar’ is anyone who post that which you disagree with or you are blissfully unaware of.
T***hfully, this should be classified as irrelevant. Do you people really need to go back to early 2023 for topics? Rhetorical question.
Basically this thread is nothing short of trolling.
Feb 28, 2024 14:09:03 #
AuntiE wrote:
Hmmm…here we are at the end of February 24, two wars occurring, hundreds of thousands i*****l a***ns flooding our borders, inflation still very high and multiple other issues and your idea of a trending issue is something that the Republicans supposedly did almost a year ago.
That would be called trolling.
That would be called trolling.
The Alabama IVF Supreme Court decision has put birth control back on the table.
Feb 28, 2024 14:14:14 #
RascalRiley wrote:
The Alabama IVF Supreme Court decision has put birth control back on the table.
Which is utterly ridiculous and shows a complete lack of knowledge. It is one state. No other state has written or proposed any laws in this regard. It is going to end up at SCOTUS and be overturned.
You people are becoming caricatures.
Feb 28, 2024 14:47:38 #
saltwind 78 wrote:
On April 21, 2023, The Republicans in the House overwhelmingly v**ed to to refuse to v**e in favor of protecting the right of citizens to use birth control devices according to The NY Times and several other news sources. I guess that they want couples to have as many children as possible.
No they didn`t!! They v**ed to keep more public funds from going to Planned Parenthood for more a******ns!! They v**ed against physicians being prosecuted for not prescribing contraceptives!! The v**ed against companies being forced to pay for contraceptives!! I researched this bill and why Republicans v**ed against the deceptions in this bill!! Did you instead spouting off about Republicans wanting everybody to have 6 kids??
Feb 28, 2024 14:50:23 #
RascalRiley wrote:
The Republican v****g record on women’s rights is very predictable.
I do not understand why you would doubt such a statement.
A simple search would have shown that 195 Republican v**ed against Birth Control Protection.
I do not understand why you would doubt such a statement.
A simple search would have shown that 195 Republican v**ed against Birth Control Protection.
A simple search would be to try and find out WHY Republicans v**ed against this bill which I did!! Did you??
Feb 28, 2024 14:54:09 #
martsiva wrote:
No they didn`t!! They v**ed to keep more public funds from going to Planned Parenthood for more a******ns!! They v**ed against physicians being prosecuted for not prescribing contraceptives!! The v**ed against companies being forced to pay for contraceptives!! I researched this bill and why Republicans v**ed against the deceptions in this bill!! Did you instead spouting off about Republicans wanting everybody to have 6 kids??
The simple fact is they are to LAZY to read legislation. They take the path of allowing the NYT and other media sources to inform them. The same is applicable to court cases.
Feb 28, 2024 14:55:06 #
martsiva wrote:
A simple search would be to try and find out WHY Republicans v**ed against this bill which I did!! Did you??
Angels will be ice skating in hades before these caricatures do any such thing. It is way to much effort.
Feb 28, 2024 15:00:50 #
American Vet wrote:
He has been proven to be a liar.
Do you trust a liar?
Do you believe every claim a proven liar posts?
Do you trust a liar?
Do you believe every claim a proven liar posts?
Non don’t. Do you trust Trump?!
Feb 28, 2024 15:10:37 #
AuntiE wrote:
The simple fact is they are to LAZY to read legislation. They take the path of allowing the NYT and other media sources to inform them. The same is applicable to court cases.
After saltwind`s post that became very obvious!!
Feb 28, 2024 15:18:40 #
Feb 28, 2024 15:20:07 #
martsiva wrote:
After saltwind`s post that became very obvious!!
T***hfully, I should probably read the Alabama case now instead of waiting. It is undoubtedly going to end up at SCOTUS.
Feb 28, 2024 17:21:59 #
saltwind 78 wrote:
On April 21, 2023, The Republicans in the House overwhelmingly v**ed to to refuse to v**e in favor of protecting the right of citizens to use birth control devices according to The NY Times and several other news sources. I guess that they want couples to have as many children as possible.
I did a paper on US birth rates in college. I found out without birth control, the average woman would have 8 children. Just look at the birth rates of Amish and Mormons if you do not believe me.
Feb 28, 2024 17:27:49 #
martsiva wrote:
No they didn`t!! They v**ed to keep more public funds from going to Planned Parenthood for more a******ns!! They v**ed against physicians being prosecuted for not prescribing contraceptives!! The v**ed against companies being forced to pay for contraceptives!! I researched this bill and why Republicans v**ed against the deceptions in this bill!! Did you instead spouting off about Republicans wanting everybody to have 6 kids??
This is their ploy to demonize the Republicans with their way of twisting the t***h to suit their narrative.
Anyone speaking against their immoral ways are therefore the bad guys .
Feb 28, 2024 17:28:36 #
pegw wrote:
I did a paper on US birth rates in college. I found out without birth control, the average woman would have 8 children. Just look at the birth rates of Amish and Mormons if you do not believe me.
And I would wager those Mormons and Amish were married.
Feb 28, 2024 17:48:35 #
pegw wrote:
I did a paper on US birth rates in college. I found out without birth control, the average woman would have 8 children. Just look at the birth rates of Amish and Mormons if you do not believe me.
Considering fertility hormones are showing a decline in both g****rs, the paper has little to no validity. In fact, even Amish and Mormon birth rates are down.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.