Republicans want you to have over six children (Page 6): Absolutely unequivocally not true. If Planned Parenthood did not strongly encourage a******ns, they would be out of business.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

[quote=Pauco]Nonsense. What you say defies common sense. Pro-choice literally means allowing choice, letting people choose. If someone does not want an a******n they are not required

Quote:

or even encouraged to have one. They should have that choice, usually a difficult one.

Absolutely unequivocally not true. If Planned Parenthood did not strongly encourage a******ns, they would be out of business.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Pauco wrote:

Nonsense. What you say defies common sense. Pro-choice literally means allowing choice, letting people choose. If someone does not want an a******n they are not required or even encouraged to have one. They should have that choice, usually a difficult one.

Why would any "clear thinking" person attach themselves to your obnoxious scenario of pro-choice if the primary option was not a choice to murder their child? One is either pro-life or pro- the option to murder their child. Pro-choice is pro-death. There are only two options, life or death.

EmilyD

padremike wrote:

Pro-choice only means that a woman with child (pregnant) has a right whether to premediate murdering her child or not.

The most unnatural thing a woman can ever do is to k**l her child.

And that is why I refer to those who support murdering babies "pro-death". They are choosing death over life - of their own babies!...how else can it be perceived?

If they are suggesting they call us "anti-choice", then I submit we call them "pro-death"....

..

Pauco

padremike wrote:

Why would any "clear thinking" person attach themselves to your obnoxious scenario of pro-choice if the primary option was not a choice to murder their child? One is either pro-life or pro- the option to murder their child. Pro-choice is pro-death. There are only two options, life or death.

Outlawing a******ns does not end a******ns, it merely moves the a******ns out of hospitals and into unsanitary back allies. And it k**ls women, some even by suicide. Anti-choice is not pro-life, it could easily mean an increase in deaths and it certainly takes away the right to choose.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Pauco wrote:

Outlawing a******ns does not end a******ns, it merely moves the a******ns out of hospitals and into unsanitary back allies. And it k**ls women, some even by suicide. Anti-choice is not pro-life, it could easily mean an increase in deaths and it certainly takes away the right to choose.

Hmmm, 900,000 (about 2400 per day) a******ns in 2023.

Are you able to answer a question. Your ilk stated making a******n legal would be safe and infrequent. Hillary Clinton was one of those to say that. Do you find over 2400 a******ns a day, in 2023, infrequent?

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

EmilyD wrote:

And that is why I refer to those who support murdering babies "pro-death". They are choosing death over life - of their own babies!...how else can it be perceived?

If they are suggesting they call us "anti-choice", then I submit we call them "pro-death"....

..

Pro-choice is pro-death camouf**ged as being more tolerant and acceptable.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

EmilyD wrote:

And that is why I refer to those who support murdering babies "pro-death". They are choosing death over life - of their own babies!...how else can it be perceived?

If they are suggesting they call us "anti-choice", then I submit we call them "pro-death"....

..

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Pauco wrote:

Outlawing a******ns does not end a******ns, it merely moves the a******ns out of hospitals and into unsanitary back allies. And it k**ls women, some even by suicide. Anti-choice is not pro-life, it could easily mean an increase in deaths and it certainly takes away the right to choose.

So from your perspective, a woman's life is more important than a child's life as pro. Life first don't feel that way at all we feel that life is equally important

Pauco

microphor wrote:

So from your perspective, a woman's life is more important than a child's life as pro. Life first don't feel that way at all we feel that life is equally important

Anti-choice takes the position that the life of a not-yet-viable fetus seems more important than the life of a woman. Pro-choice views that differently.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Pauco wrote:

Anti-choice takes the position that the life of a not-yet-viable fetus seems more important than the life of a woman. Pro-choice views that differently.

One of the deceitful tactics of evil people like you is to first dehumanize their victims before they murder or ens***e them. A fetus? Fetus is Latin for “little one. Embryo in Greek means "young one." Fetus in Evilspeak means a blob of cells.

What is more important a new life or a mother so evil that for convenience sake she can choose to k**l her unborn child deeming that child's unexamined life is less important than her own.

Question: Have you always been an atheist or is this something you eventually chose believing your "choice" means you'll never have to answer for immoral thoughts, words and actions?

martsiva

AuntiE wrote:

All this individual did was post the new DNC mantra to not call it pro choice. It was in the news a few weeks ago.

Pro-choice is what the Democrats are - how can they call it anything else??

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Pauco wrote:

Anti-choice takes the position that the life of a not-yet-viable fetus seems more important than the life of a woman. Pro-choice views that differently.

Listen god junior, what makes that life non viable? Is it because you say so, cuz all the other excuses we've already set aside as not relevant. We are not saying the mother's life is not important. We're saying that inconvenience of carrying a pregnancy for term, a pregnancy that you lay down for, isn't a good excuse to just k**l an unborn baby. You pro death people will do anything not to be inconvenienced.

Pauco

EmilyD wrote:

And that is why I refer to those who support murdering babies "pro-death". They are choosing death over life - of their own babies!...how else can it be perceived?

If they are suggesting they call us "anti-choice", then I submit we call them "pro-death"....

..

I'm pro-choice. You should have the right to spout wh**ever nonsense you want. I was suggesting only that those who feel differently should take advantage of their own right to speak and write honestly, without bowing to the feelings of the anti-choice crowd.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Pauco wrote:

I'm pro-choice. You should have the right to spout wh**ever nonsense you want. I was suggesting only that those who feel differently should take advantage of their own right to speak and write honestly, without bowing to the feelings of the anti-choice crowd.

You have a right to speak enshrined in the 1st Amendment. There is no right to murder children found in the Constitution it's found only in the hearts and minds of evil people.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Pauco wrote:

I'm pro-choice. You should have the right to spout wh**ever nonsense you want. I was suggesting only that those who feel differently should take advantage of their own right to speak and write honestly, without bowing to the feelings of the anti-choice crowd.

Hmm, as a long term site member, I would suggest we need no suggestions from you. For going on 11 years, members have been writing freely about their positions on multiple issues.