One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Can't Have It...
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jan 8, 2015 16:33:25   #
Snoopy
 
Bad Bob wrote:
We will and then ya get locked up in a FEMA camp too.

:lol: :lol:


Bad Bob

That means you want the federal government to control EVERY part of your life with regards to personal freedom.

Why is a comprehensive background check, also joined with the mental health database, not enough to ensure the stability and honesty of a firearm owner?

It also should be noted that the majority of shooting incidents were carried out by people with mental health issues.

Snoopy

Reply
Jan 8, 2015 16:42:24   #
CarolSeer2016
 
Bad Bob wrote:
:shock:


She changed? Must have been her weak feminine libido.

Reply
Jan 8, 2015 16:47:26   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
Bad Bob wrote:
A well regulated m*****a being necessary to the security of a free state,

Pretty sample English ain't it. Well regulated m*****a.

:-D :-D :-D :-D


only a liberal could misinterpret the second amendment if they could read there would be no problem with what it says

Reply
 
 
Jan 8, 2015 16:47:35   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Snoopy wrote:
Bad Bob

That means you want the federal government to control EVERY part of your life with regards to personal freedom.

Why is a comprehensive background check, also joined with the mental health database, not enough to ensure the stability and honesty of a firearm owner?

It also should be noted that the majority of shooting incidents were carried out by people with mental health issues.

Snoopy
Naaa Snoop only gun nuts.

Reply
Jan 8, 2015 16:49:10   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
MarvinSussman wrote:
Why is the registration of a buyer's name an infringement on the buyer's right to buy and keep the weapon?


bite by bite, mean anything to you of course you will deny it

Reply
Jan 8, 2015 17:34:53   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
alex wrote:
only a liberal could misinterpret the second amendment if they could read there would be no problem with what it says
Well Regulated

Well
Define Well at Dictionary.com
dictionary.reference.com/browse/well Dictionary.com
4. commendably, meritoriously, or excellently:
Regulated
control or maintain the rate or speed of (a machine or process) so that it operates properly

Reply
Jan 8, 2015 17:56:03   #
Armageddun Loc: The show me state
 
Bad Bob wrote:
A well regulated m*****a being necessary to the security of a free state,

Pretty sample English ain't it. Well regulated m*****a.

:-D :-D :-D :-D


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Jan 8, 2015 17:59:38   #
CarolSeer2016
 
See my thread: Standing armies--further exposition.

Reply
Jan 8, 2015 18:03:08   #
Armageddun Loc: The show me state
 
MrEd wrote:
I don't think you understand the second amendment exactly right. A well regulated m*****a is only one of many reasons we have a right to bear arms. They couldn't put every reason in there or they would be taking a chance they would forget something and then the government would scream if we tried to use our guns for that. Aside from a m*****a, we have a right to self defense, hunting, sport shooting and ANYTHING else you can think of so long as it does not interfere with the rights of someone else.

I think if you truly read and understand our Constitution, you will find that we have a government of enumerated powers. ALL of their authority is listed in the Constitution and if it is not listed, then they do NOT have the authority to do that. Our 10th amendment states that ALL POWERS NOT VESTED IN THE GOVERNMENT IS RESERVED TO THE STATES, OR THE PEOPLE. That's pretty simple isn't it? If we do not delegate a power to this government, then they CAN'T have that power, because we have reserved it for the states, or the people.
I don't think you understand the second amendment ... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jan 8, 2015 18:37:34   #
MarvinSussman
 
MrEd wrote:
For two reasons.

1. The government have NO authority to do this. The Constitution does NOT give them the authority to register ANYTHING, let alone guns.

2. When the government decides it is going to take those guns away, then they know exactly were they are and who to go after to get them. Don't think that registration does not lead to confiscation, because it ALWAYS has in the past and there is no reason to think that our government never will. As soon as they think they can get away with it, they will come take them.
For two reasons. br br 1. The government have NO ... (show quote)


1. US Constitution, ARTICLE I, Section 8: "To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. "

2. That excuse, if allowed to stand, can be used to disparage any law and will ultimately destroy the Constitution. You are wrong. Period.

Reply
Jan 9, 2015 06:18:24   #
Snoopy
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Naaa Snoop only gun nuts.


Bad Bob

I guess my post was very difficult for you to understand and therefore you could not respond with an intelligent answer.

Snoopy

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2015 06:58:02   #
Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Naaa Snoop only gun nuts.


******************************
Meaning......the guy/gal who is considered to not have enough shot in their load? Or....the avid sportsman, competition shooter or conceal carry holder? Which is it?

Just want a little clarification.

Reply
Jan 9, 2015 07:06:16   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Armageddun wrote:
A well regulated m*****a being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.


To me this says each state should develop and have a well regulated (Well Ordered and established recognized m*****a) in order to keep each state free.

As well as the right of the individual to keep in their possession and carry arms.

It is the responsibility of the law and legal system to take care of those who use weapons in an illegal manner. It is not the responsibility of the president or congress to interpret the constitution.

To change the constitution is the responsibility of the people beginning the initiative.
A well regulated m*****a being necessary to the se... (show quote)


Amen!!!! And just to reiterate, ain't nobody taken my gun(s), period.. And Thankfully, thus far the SCOTUS sees it the same way~~~

Reply
Jan 9, 2015 07:20:56   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
MarvinSussman wrote:
1. US Constitution, ARTICLE I, Section 8: "To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. "

2. That excuse, if allowed to stand, can be used to disparage any law and will ultimately destroy the Constitution. You are wrong. Period.


And history shows what??? The Constitution is the foundation of the law of land and has worked quite well in protecting and defending~~what's wrong with it, if I may ask??

Reply
Jan 9, 2015 07:52:58   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Bad Bob wrote:
A well regulated m*****a being necessary to the security of a free state,

Pretty sample English ain't it. Well regulated m*****a.

:-D :-D :-D :-D



Yes, it is and I support it~~

Thomas Jefferson envisioned the needs of the people if there ever came another time that they needed to o*******w an oppressive government. One of the biggest problems our Founding Fathers had was fielding a well "armed" m*****a to fight against the well armed British Army. The Americans frequently fought with hunting rifles against cannons. Being a revolutionary himself, and knowing the problems revolutionaries have, his intent when he wrote the Second Amendment is quite clear. Clearly, the "populace" was his intended beneficiary of the right to keep and bear arms. Gun control advocates want you to forget all about why he wrote that, and the government certainly h**es the idea of being o*******wn, but the reason Jefferson wrote the Second Amendment the way he did is quite clear for anyone who is willing to learn the facts.




Full Definition of M*****A

1
a : a part of the organized armed forces of a country liable to call only in emergency
b : a body of citizens organized for military service
2
: the whole body of able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service
See m*****a defined for English-language learners »
See m*****a defined for kids »
Origin of M*****A



bivouac, logistics, petard, salient, sally, supernumerary, tactical
m*****a noun (Concise Encyclopedia)
Military organization of citizens with limited military training who are available for emergency service, usually for local defense. In many countries the m*****a is of ancient origin. The Anglo-Saxons required every able-bodied free male to serve. In colonial America it was the only defense against hostile Indians when regular British forces were not available. In the American Revolution the m*****a, called the Minutemen, provided the bulk of the American forces. M*****as played a similar role in the War of 1812 and the American Civil War. State-controlled volunteer m*****as in the U.S. became the National Guard. British m*****a units, begun in the 16th century for home defense and answerable to the county sheriff or lord lieutenant, were absorbed into the regular army in the 20th century. Today various paramilitary organizations, from U.S. w***e s*********ts to revolutionaries in the developing world, use the term m*****a to accentuate their populist origins.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.