BIRDMAN

Why would it not be evidence it proves his father is a crook🤪🤪🤪🤪

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

While I doubt it proves any wrongdoing by President Biden.. if the chain of custody is broken it will not, can not be used in a court of law.. because it cannot be proven that the contents were not changed during the two years or more it was in the hands of people unknown.. that is the law..

BIRDMAN

So if I k**l my wife I could just say the computer was tampered with

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Ummmm.......mail in b****ts, and any other political mail......

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

It seems Bird, you may not know what chain of custody is about.. Has nothing at all to do with the wife you k**led,,, per say.. Or only to computers, it covers all potential evidence..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551677/

Chain of Custody
Ashish Badiye; Neeti Kapoor; Ritesh G. Menezes.

Author Information and Affiliations
Last Update: February 13, 2023.

The chain of custody is the most critical process of evidence documentation. It is a must to assure the court of law that the evidence is authentic, i.e., it is the same evidence seized at the crime scene. It was, at all times, in the custody of a person designated to handle it and for which it was never unaccounted. Although it is a lengthy process, it is required for evidence to be relevant in the court. The continuity of possession of evidence or custody of evidence and its movement and location from the point of discovery and recovery (at the scene of a crime or from a person), to its t***sport to the laboratory for examination and until the time it is allowed and admitted in the court, is known as the chain of custody or chain of evidence.

Go to:
Issues of Concern
Importance of the Chain of Custody

The chain of custody proves the integrity of a piece of evidence.[1] A paper trail is maintained so that the persons who had charge of the evidence at any given time can be known quickly and summoned to testify during the trial if required.

A record of the chain of evidence must be maintained and established in the court whenever presenting evidence as an exhibit.[2] Otherwise, the evidence may be inadmissible in the court leading to serious questions regarding its legitimacy, integrity, and the examination rendered upon it.[3] The chain of custody needs to document every t***smission from the moment the evidence is collected, from one person to another, to establish that nobody else could have accessed or possessed that evidence without authorization. Although there is no limit on the number of t***sfers, it is crucial to keep this number as low as possible.

Evidence requires conscientious handling to avert tampering. The chain of custody is said to be the sequential documentation or trail that accounts for the sequence of custody, control, t***sfer, analysis, and disposition of physical or electronic evidence. The goal is to establish that the evidence is related to the alleged crime, was collected from the scene, and was in its original/unaltered condition rather than having been tampered with or "planted" deceitfully to make someone seem guilty. The chain of custody maintains the integrity of the sample. The traceability of the record of the control, t***sfer, and analysis of samples indicates the t***sparency to the procedure.[4]

Maintaining the chain of custody is critical in forensic practice.[5] This step of documentation is vital because everything done for the examination and analysis of the evidentiary sample must be authorized and recorded. The liability for the condition rests with everyone coming in contact with it. The documentation should be comprehensive with information regarding the circumstances of evidence collection, the people who handled the evidence, period of the guardianship of evidence, safekeeping conditions while handling and/or storing of the evidence, and how evidence is handed over to subsequent custodians every time a t***sfer occurs (along with the signs of individuals involved at the respective stage). It prevents police officers and other labs/law officials involved from tainting the evidence or misplacing the piece of evidence as it would eventually be traceable back to them, and they would be held responsible for the same.[6]

archie bunker Loc: Texas

So, if the chain of custody is broken on mail in b****ts, does that mean that they cannot be proven to be accurate?

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Really... Good.... Do not think I was ever instructed on those.. if so I forgot it all. That could well be the fact.. forgot.. but also do not recall ever handling a mail in b****t.. except my own when I mailed it in from Camp Pendleton.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Honest, I do not know Archie.. need to check with someone else on that.. not a crime like the examples...



A moment of thought.... do not think it would matter. the b****ts are not evidence in any crime.. but you should check further if you are really interested..

BIRDMAN

👍👍👍

archie bunker Loc: Texas

I'm gonna go discuss quantum physics with my dog. It's a more intelligent conversation, and less frustrating than you.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

FYI, the diary was not sold. It was delivered free of charge at which time law enforcement authorities were notified by the receiving news organization.

Pot meet kettle. Your threads are as guilty as anyone else of being one sided…your side.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

the thieves got 40,000$ as a down payment, think it all went to the lawyers.. the thieves are in cells.. the news groups who had it varied from those who said they were agents to some who felt it was so nasty to steal and reveal the diary that whoever did so would not survive as a biz.. one of those was the defunct outfit which did the f**e tape of Planned Parenthood... forget the name.. but even they did not want to publish the diary.. they doing so would be so low they would loose business.. as it turned out, they are gone or nearly so over some other deeds..

someone did leak the names and the theft of the diary and the other items.. then the law tracked down the two criminals.

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

You take stupid to a whole new level....... does your husband know you post i***t views publicly?

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

Hmmmm, prolly why permaliar's dog left his sorry ass and moved in with the neighbors.....the dog couldn't handle being molested by an i***t...or worse, having to listen to the drunk i***t that filled his dog dish drone on with endless stupid.

Smart dog.

WEBCO

If you believe so