More shenanigans.
Did J. Biden really take showers with his daughter like she said in her diary?
Let me quote another Quoran who replied on this topic
‘’…Ashley Biden’s alleged diary which was stolen from a room she stayed in and sold to a politically-motivated “news” organization, and then leaked by a disgruntled employee with an even-less-scrupulous reputation after said organization refused to publish it when they couldn’t determine that it was authentic? The diary that Trump’s campaign wouldn’t touch, either?
The above should be setting off sirens in your head that anything published in this “diary” would be considered suspect, but then you’re apparently not concerned at all with allegations of this manner unless it hurts a Democratic politician…………There is this pesky little thing called “chain of custody”, the same thing that dogs the whole “H****r B***n laptop” case. Even if the item is legitimate, and no one has been able to verify that this diary is, once a personal item leaves the hands of its owner without their permission, the chain of custody is considered to be broken. In the hands of politically-motivated individuals, contents can be altered, taken out of context and/or skewed towards wh**ever purpose they wish. As such, even if the diary was formerly authentic, it no longer is.’’
permafrost wrote:
Did J. Biden really take showers with his daughter like she said in her diary?
Let me quote another Quoran who replied on this topic
‘’…Ashley Biden’s alleged diary which was stolen from a room she stayed in and sold to a politically-motivated “news” organization, and then leaked by a disgruntled employee with an even-less-scrupulous reputation after said organization refused to publish it when they couldn’t determine that it was authentic? The diary that Trump’s campaign wouldn’t touch, either?
The above should be setting off sirens in your head that anything published in this “diary” would be considered suspect, but then you’re apparently not concerned at all with allegations of this manner unless it hurts a Democratic politician…………There is this pesky little thing called “chain of custody”, the same thing that dogs the whole “H****r B***n laptop” case. Even if the item is legitimate, and no one has been able to verify that this diary is, once a personal item leaves the hands of its owner without their permission, the chain of custody is considered to be broken. In the hands of politically-motivated individuals, contents can be altered, taken out of context and/or skewed towards wh**ever purpose they wish. As such, even if the diary was formerly authentic, it no longer is.’’
Did J. Biden really take showers with his daughter... (
show quote)
Such hypocritical BS from you the champion of guilt by accusation and whose favorite sources are unknown and anonymous when it comes to Republicans.
permafrost wrote:
Did J. Biden really take showers with his daughter like she said in her diary?
Let me quote another Quoran who replied on this topic
‘’…Ashley Biden’s alleged diary which was stolen from a room she stayed in and sold to a politically-motivated “news” organization, and then leaked by a disgruntled employee with an even-less-scrupulous reputation after said organization refused to publish it when they couldn’t determine that it was authentic? The diary that Trump’s campaign wouldn’t touch, either?
The above should be setting off sirens in your head that anything published in this “diary” would be considered suspect, but then you’re apparently not concerned at all with allegations of this manner unless it hurts a Democratic politician…………There is this pesky little thing called “chain of custody”, the same thing that dogs the whole “H****r B***n laptop” case. Even if the item is legitimate, and no one has been able to verify that this diary is, once a personal item leaves the hands of its owner without their permission, the chain of custody is considered to be broken. In the hands of politically-motivated individuals, contents can be altered, taken out of context and/or skewed towards wh**ever purpose they wish. As such, even if the diary was formerly authentic, it no longer is.’’
Did J. Biden really take showers with his daughter... (
show quote)
Chain of custody.......hummmph.....
Does, or should this term also apply to mail in b****ts? Or, something as benign as say, the debunked Steel dossier that convicted Trump of drinking Russian hooker pee among other things with all of you hypocritical, double standard, mental feebs?
permafrost wrote:
Did J. Biden really take showers with his daughter like she said in her diary?
Let me quote another Quoran who replied on this topic
‘’…Ashley Biden’s alleged diary which was stolen from a room she stayed in and sold to a politically-motivated “news” organization, and then leaked by a disgruntled employee with an even-less-scrupulous reputation after said organization refused to publish it when they couldn’t determine that it was authentic? The diary that Trump’s campaign wouldn’t touch, either?
The above should be setting off sirens in your head that anything published in this “diary” would be considered suspect, but then you’re apparently not concerned at all with allegations of this manner unless it hurts a Democratic politician…………There is this pesky little thing called “chain of custody”, the same thing that dogs the whole “H****r B***n laptop” case. Even if the item is legitimate, and no one has been able to verify that this diary is, once a personal item leaves the hands of its owner without their permission, the chain of custody is considered to be broken. In the hands of politically-motivated individuals, contents can be altered, taken out of context and/or skewed towards wh**ever purpose they wish. As such, even if the diary was formerly authentic, it no longer is.’’
Did J. Biden really take showers with his daughter... (
show quote)
Everybody knows H****rs laptop was his, at least anyone with a functioning brain.
If it wasn't Ashlies, why was the SDNY seeing to get it back, at HER request?
WEBCO wrote:
Everybody knows H****rs laptop was his, at least anyone with a functioning brain.
If it wasn't Ashlies, why was the SDNY seeing to get it back, at HER request?
It was in the hands of the two people who got jail time for stealing it and other personal items..
the chain of custody rule is long standing and must always be maintained.
permafrost wrote:
Did J. Biden really take showers with his daughter like she said in her diary?
Let me quote another Quoran who replied on this topic
‘’…Ashley Biden’s alleged diary which was stolen from a room she stayed in and sold to a politically-motivated “news” organization, and then leaked by a disgruntled employee with an even-less-scrupulous reputation after said organization refused to publish it when they couldn’t determine that it was authentic? The diary that Trump’s campaign wouldn’t touch, either?
The above should be setting off sirens in your head that anything published in this “diary” would be considered suspect, but then you’re apparently not concerned at all with allegations of this manner unless it hurts a Democratic politician…………There is this pesky little thing called “chain of custody”, the same thing that dogs the whole “H****r B***n laptop” case. Even if the item is legitimate, and no one has been able to verify that this diary is, once a personal item leaves the hands of its owner without their permission, the chain of custody is considered to be broken. In the hands of politically-motivated individuals, contents can be altered, taken out of context and/or skewed towards wh**ever purpose they wish. As such, even if the diary was formerly authentic, it no longer is.’’
Did J. Biden really take showers with his daughter... (
show quote)
Chain of custody...like in 'those drop box b****ts'
😆 what a 'nad
permafrost wrote:
It was in the hands of the two people who got jail time for stealing it and other personal items..
the chain of custody rule is long standing and must always be maintained.
Do you think they added to it?
Because it was definitely hers.
Sonny Magoo wrote:
Chain of custody...like in 'those drop box b****ts'
😆 what a 'nad
why would a box of b****ts have a chain of custody?? Maybe they do.. I have never been involved with t***sporting b****ts.. But it would not be in the same orbit as the law covering evidence or stolen property..
In which case the obvious concern in a diary or anything which accepts data is the adding or changing of the data..
WEBCO wrote:
Do you think they added to it?
Because it was definitely hers.
I just made a line about that, had not mentioned it ... yes that is the concern in the justice system.. no way to be positive about that one way or the other.. And in the diary case the know actions of the many people who had access to the diary made the rewriting or additions to it very much a possibility..
permafrost wrote:
I just made a line about that, had not mentioned it ... yes that is the concern in the justice system.. no way to be positive about that one way or the other.. And in the diary case the know actions of the many people who had access to the diary made the rewriting or additions to it very much a possibility..
Yes and H****r’s laptop was f**e too
permafrost wrote:
why would a box of b****ts have a chain of custody?? Maybe they do.. I have never been involved with t***sporting b****ts.. But it would not be in the same orbit as the law covering evidence or stolen property..
In which case the obvious concern in a diary or anything which accepts data is the adding or changing of the data..
Quit, Permi!! I'm getting embarrassed for you.
I ain't all that bright, but I've dealt with "chain of custody" stuff for more years than I can remember.
Your attempted narrow view of this term caused Pathetic to commit suicide, and leave it's estate to Just Plain Stupid.
Seriously, quit while you're down on the mat. Tap out.
BIRDMAN wrote:
Yes and H****r’s laptop was f**e too
does not matter, if it exists, it has no value as evidence in any court in the USA... again... chain of evidence and the very suspicious story that goes along with the "laptop" journey..
archie bunker wrote:
Quit, Permi!! I'm getting embarrassed for you.
I ain't all that bright, but I've dealt with "chain of custody" stuff for more years than I can remember.
Your attempted narrow view of this term caused Pathetic to commit suicide, and leave it's estate to Just Plain Stupid.
Seriously, quit while you're down on the mat. Tap out.
Did you have a bad experience with chain of custody??? It is fairly common but even the county mounties up here are getting more disciplined about it.. Nothing at all to be embarrassed about.. it is all very factual..
I think the Post office has a chain of custody rule, for at least some mail.. or maybe I recall in error.. nuts..
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.