White House Says Its Nearly Completed Executive Actions on Gun Control (Page 3): Go ahead make my DAY!

ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio

The Dutchman wrote:

b Looks as though these i***ts are about to once ... (show quote)

Go ahead make my DAY!

Must READ for Loyal American Citizens

The Dutchman

The little extremely insignificant one (AKA)Poco624 wrote:
Liberals do not want to take away your Constitutional rights to murder babies. Judging from the picture I just saw from reading "Children With Guns More Deadly Than Mass Shooters In America" it looks the the GOP teething ring is a barrel of a gun.

We do not want to take away the rights of a 3 or 6 year old to murder their siblings or parents. In one case a 4 year old k**led his Iraq War veteran dad and he gets to grow up knowing that he k**led his dad. It looks like as long as your guns are k*****g babies that is justified by your 2nd Amendment. And that blood is on your hands and the hands of your crazed lunatic gun totin' hicks.

AuntiE wrote:

Fifty with guns and how many did not make it out of the womb alive during the same period? Hmm...how many made it partially out of the womb alive; however, by the time they were fully delivered were no longer alive?
You actually want to take away the rights to be born.

AuntiE I think we all to well know this little extremely insignificant one just pulls this stuff out of it's anal orifice!
All we do by responding to it is feed it's desire for the human contact it so desperately lacks!

ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio

Mack Deaton wrote:

I do not know if you will print this or not. br Ob... (show quote)

Exactly the responsibility of Congress to hold everybody fully responsible to the United States Constitution the Supreme Law of our NATION!

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Poco624 wrote:

Oh right, a******n is the only murder. Remember, t... (show quote)

Your position is because there is a SCOTUS decision and support by two medical associations the death in the womb of hundreds of fetuses per month is okay; however, having a US Constitutional Amendment allowing the ownership of a weapon the death of 3.8 people is worse.

What a ............never mind....it is simply to rude to post.

Loki Loc: Georgia

MechDvtEngr wrote:

Please, let us start with the basics. The weapon ... (show quote)

"Please let us start with the basics." Yes, let us do that.
First, the weapon that won the Revolution and enabled a "draw" in the War of 1812 was NOT a "Kaintuck Toothpick." There is not, and never was any such thing. There was an "Arkansas Toothpick," which was a large knife, double edged, supposedly invented by James Black. (Untrue, but more of that anon). However, there was no such thing as an "Arkansas Toothpick" in the time period of the Revolution and War of 1812. The "Arkansas Toothpick" was not invented until the 1830s. (For that matter, neither was Arkansas). The vast majority of American Forces, (and British) were armed with smoothbore flintlock muskets. The Continental Army did not charge massed British troops carrying nothing but large knives. You do not attend a gunfight carrying a knife, which is why I will not essay your second suggestion, that of walking down the streets of a large city carrying one. My Sig Sauer .40 would be a far more appropriate choice.

You are correct in one particular, the ammunition I fire is not the sulfur, saltpeter, and charcoal "gunpowder" of the 18th Century. The ammunition I fire is 165 grain hollowpoints, propelled by a sufficient quantity of a "highly evolved def**gerant." (For those of you who are wondering, a def**gerant is simply modern smokeless powder). DuPont, among others, makes tons of the stuff. As to your other statement, I routinely make ammunition in my home, I just purchase the "def**gerant" ready made.

Regarding your last statement: "You are not going to resist a modern military with the firearms you are allowed to own today," perhaps you would regale us with your combat quals and experience, that you would make such a sweeping (and untrue) statement. Your statement of my ignorance and stupidity, coupled with my complete misunderstanding of the nature of modern warfare, leads me to believe that you have somehow gained the wisdom to enlighten me. Which branch of the Armed Forces did you serve in, that allowed you to gain these insights?

One more thing: "The Shot Heard 'Round the World" was written in 1837, not 1838, and the phrase is used just as frequently to allude to Gavrilo Princip's assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand, which act precipitated WWI.

ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio

Poco624 wrote:

Liberals do not want to take away your Constitutio... (show quote)

What makes you think conservatives support murder of innocent children? LIEberals are the vile individuals falsely claiming to have a "constitutional right" to murder the unborn. Roe V. Wade. Being defenceless is INSANITY! Especially in this day and age when so much EVIL exists.

As for 3 to 6 year old's murdering others liberals have yet to accomplish this. I am quite certain you liberals are hard at work on it. Lying to children about American History while denigrating the founding fathers trashing Christianity is TREASON. This is a recipe for creating barbarians instead of citizens capable of taking on responsibility in society.

The God you trash all day long gives everybody the absolute RIGHT of self defence. No individual or government grants this right. To infringe upon this right is EVIL and will be punished severely. Those like you who prevent others from defending themselves are guilty of the crimes committed by those you enable. No, the BLOOD is on YOUR HANDS, not conservatives.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

banjojack wrote:

"Please let us start with the basics." Yes, let us do that.
First, the weapon that won the Revolution and enabled a "draw" in the War of 1812 was NOT a "Kaintuck Toothpick." There is not, and never was any such thing. There was an "Arkansas Toothpick," which was a large knife, double edged, supposedly invented by James Black. (Untrue, but more of that anon). However, there was no such thing as an "Arkansas Toothpick" in the time period of the Revolution and War of 1812. The "Arkansas Toothpick" was not invented until the 1830s. (For that matter, neither was Arkansas). The vast majority of American Forces, (and British) were armed with smoothbore flintlock muskets. The Continental Army did not charge massed British troops carrying nothing but large knives. You do not attend a gunfight carrying a knife, which is why I will not essay your second suggestion, that of walking down the streets of a large city carrying one. My Sig Sauer .40 would be a far more appropriate choice.

You are correct in one particular, the ammunition I fire is not the sulfur, saltpeter, and charcoal "gunpowder" of the 18th Century. The ammunition I fire is 165 grain hollowpoints, propelled by a sufficient quantity of a "highly evolved def**gerant." (For those of you who are wondering, a def**gerant is simply modern smokeless powder). DuPont, among others, makes tons of the stuff. As to your other statement, I routinely make ammunition in my home, I just purchase the "def**gerant" ready made.

Regarding your last statement: "You are not going to resist a modern military with the firearms you are allowed to own today," perhaps you would regale us with your combat quals and experience, that you would make such a sweeping (and untrue) statement. Your statement of my ignorance and stupidity, coupled with my complete misunderstanding of the nature of modern warfare, leads me to believe that you have somehow gained the wisdom to enlighten me. Which branch of the Armed Forces did you serve in, that allowed you to gain these insights?

One more thing: "The Shot Heard 'Round the World" was written in 1837, not 1838, and the phrase is used just as frequently to allude to Gavrilo Princip's assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand, which act precipitated WWI.

"Please let us start with the basics." Y... (show quote)

Go to the Introduce Yourself Page. His introduction is enlightening or not.

The Dutchman

AuntiE wrote:

Go to the Introduce Yourself Page. His introduction is enlightening or not.

:thumbup:

CATMANDU381

Guess they think it will work. See how gun control in Chicago did. They only had 46 shootings last week. Pray to the rain god that while Obama is in Africa on his tax payers money doing a vacation at 60 to 100 million while border patrol is having to walk fences because they don't have money for gas. That he gets home sick and stays there.

Loki Loc: Georgia

CATMANDU381 wrote:

Guess they think it will work. See how gun control in Chicago did. They only had 46 shootings last week. Pray to the rain god that while Obama is in Africa on his tax payers money doing a vacation at 60 to 100 million while border patrol is having to walk fences because they don't have money for gas. That he gets home sick and stays there.

What do you mean, HIS taxpayer money?

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

banjojack wrote:

What do you mean, HIS taxpayer money?

It may be an error in presentation; however, if you think about it, it is accurate.

He sees us as "his" taxpayers.

PS: check and answer your messages!

CATMANDU381

I mean it in this way. Ever what a door mat feels like when somebody wipes dog crap on it. About sums up what I think of his policies.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

CATMANDU381 wrote:

I mean it in this way. Ever what a door mat feels like when somebody wipes dog crap on it. About sums up what I think of his policies.

I actually believe without intent you were accurate in the wording "his taxpayers". He sees us as working to pay him for an agenda that is bankrupt and ultimately bankrupt for the country.