oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
With those pictures you have driven the nail clear through the board. They are so right.
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
And yet we hear about Obama and Biden getting ready to EO us about gun control. I think they really believe that we all want gun control.
Did you see mention that in the movie, "Red Dawn" the Russian officer told the Cuban officer to get down to the local gun shop and get his hands on the 4473 forms so they would know who had guns etc. Who really thinks that 4473 forms were ever for any other purpose?
The Dutchman wrote:
b Looks as though these i***ts are about to once ... (
show quote)
Liberals do not want to take away your Constitutional rights to murder babies. Judging from the picture I just saw from reading "Children With Guns More Deadly Than Mass Shooters In America" it looks the the GOP teething ring is a barrel of a gun.
We do not want to take away the rights of a 3 or 6 year old to murder their siblings or parents. In one case a 4 year old k**led his Iraq War veteran dad and he gets to grow up knowing that he k**led his dad. It looks like as long as your guns are k*****g babies that is justified by your 2nd Amendment. And that blood is on your hands and the hands of your crazed lunatic gun totin' hicks.
Query: If 90% of Americans want gun control, and 3 showed up at the rally, I wonder where the (according to the media) 1/2 person who doesn't want it wandered off to. Do these anti-gun propaganda pundits take stupid classes? Nobody comes by this much dumbass naturally.
Poco624 wrote:
Liberals do not want to take away your Constitutional rights to murder babies. Judging from the picture I just saw from reading "Children With Guns More Deadly Than Mass Shooters In America" it looks the the GOP teething ring is a barrel of a gun.
We do not want to take away the rights of a 3 or 6 year old to murder their siblings or parents. In one case a 4 year old k**led his Iraq War veteran dad and he gets to grow up knowing that he k**led his dad. It looks like as long as your guns are k*****g babies that is justified by your 2nd Amendment. And that blood is on your hands and the hands of your crazed lunatic gun totin' hicks.
Liberals do not want to take away your Constitutio... (
show quote)
Where do you obtain your information? How about some sources? By the way, anyone who supports a******n on demand has no room to talk about k*****g babies.
I do not know if you will print this or not.
Obama, is a lying,coward,bullying SON OF A B***H.
I do not know what is wrong with our CONGRESS, I guess they do not have the BALLS to go after Obama. Maybe they are afraid of him. He damn sure can't do nothing to them. If he does then Congress has a recourse and should have done their JOB by IMPEACHING the SON OF A B***H, he is a DAMN MUSLUM, and also he should also be charged with TREASON over B******I. According to the UCMJ, the
penalty for TREASON is DEATH before a FIRING SQUAD. After all he is the so called commander in chief of the MILITARY.
What I and a lot of WE THE PEOPLE want to know is, WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH OUR CONGRESS, ARE THEY ALL PUPPETS OF Obama, or are TO DAMN LAZY OR SORRY TO DO THE JOB THEY WERE ELECTED TO DO? CONGRESS NEEDS THEY ARE PUT IN OFFICE BY THE PEOPLE. THEY ARE THERE TO WORK FOR US [WE THE PEOPLE] NOT TO
KISS obamas ASS AN DO HIS BIDDING. IF THEY DO NOT WORK FOR THE PEOPLE THEN THEY CAN BE REPLACED BY THE PEOPLE..IF THEY DO NOT DO THEIR JOB {WE THE PEOPLE] NEED TO IMPEACH CONGRESS FOR DERILECTION
OF THEIR DUTY TO [WE THE PEOPLE]. OR MAYBE WE THE PEOPLE NEED TO MARCH ON WASHINGTON, BUT DO NOT GO EMPTY HANDED. THIS WILL SEND A MESSAGE TO THAT
DUMB SON OF A B***H AND CONGRESS THAT [WE THE PEOPLE] ARE TAKING OUR COUNTRY BACK AND MAKE IT PROUD AND STRONG. Obama IS NOT AN AMERICAN BY BIRTH THEREFORE HE CAN NOT HOLD OFFICE. HE HAS LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND NEEDS TO BE DEALT WITH NOW BEFORE HE COMPLETELY DESTROYS OUR GREAT NATION.
Well said
:thumbup: :thumbup: :roll: :roll:
alex
Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
oldroy wrote:
I thought you were really confused at first but then the t***h came out. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
I guess I can read minds I knew that's what was coming
Please, let us start with the basics. The weapon that won our Revolutionary War and fought the War of 1812 to a draw was the Kaintuck Toothpick and not a firearm! I suggest that you try walking down a street in any metropolitan area in America with a (say) 8 inch blade sheath knife (much less a 20-24 inch Toothpick) h*****g from your belt. The Shot Heard Round the World is a poem that was not written until 1838.
The ammunition you fire is not saltpetre, sulfur, & charcoal "gunpowder" of the 18th century, it is a highly evolved def**gerant that, when purchased for any use other than firearms requires (1) an explosive's license and (2) registration of the taggent ID against said explosive's license. Were you to try to make any of the components of modern ammunition in your "home shop," you will be "caught" -- by your local fire department!
You are not going to resist a modern military with the firearms you are allowed to own today. Such a suggestion represents a combination of ignorance and stupidity -- as well as a complete misunderstanding of the nature of modern warfare.
The little extremely insignificant one (AKA)Poco624 wrote:Liberals do not want to take away your Constitutional rights to murder babies. Judging from the picture I just saw from reading "Children With Guns More Deadly Than Mass Shooters In America" it looks the the GOP teething ring is a barrel of a gun.
We do not want to take away the rights of a 3 or 6 year old to murder their siblings or parents. In one case a 4 year old k**led his Iraq War veteran dad and he gets to grow up knowing that he k**led his dad. It looks like as long as your guns are k*****g babies that is justified by your 2nd Amendment. And that blood is on your hands and the hands of your crazed lunatic gun totin' hicks.
banjojack wrote:
Where do you obtain your information? How about some sources? By the way, anyone who supports a******n on demand has no room to talk about k*****g babies.
Banjo Jack, I think we all to well know this little extremely insignificant one just pulls this stuff out of it's anal orifice!
banjojack wrote:
Where do you obtain your information? How about some sources? By the way, anyone who supports a******n on demand has no room to talk about k*****g babies.
Oh right, a******n is the only murder. Remember, the GOP only save babies just to shoot them. Obviously your 2nd Amendment gives you the right to murder inocent babies and children. We have Roe v. Wade, and the support of "The American Congress of OB/GYN", "The American Medical Women's Association" and "Journal of the American Medical Association".
This is my source of info. 19 deaths in 5 months where the shooter was 3 to 6 years old.
Children With Guns More Deadly Than Mass Shooters In America
http://samuel-warde.com/2013/06/children-with-guns-more-deadly-than-mass-shooters-in-america/
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
Poco624 wrote:
Liberals do not want to take away your Constitutional rights to murder babies. Judging from the picture I just saw from reading "Children With Guns More Deadly Than Mass Shooters In America" it looks the the GOP teething ring is a barrel of a gun.
We do not want to take away the rights of a 3 or 6 year old to murder their siblings or parents. In one case a 4 year old k**led his Iraq War veteran dad and he gets to grow up knowing that he k**led his dad. It looks like as long as your guns are k*****g babies that is justified by your 2nd Amendment. And that blood is on your hands and the hands of your crazed lunatic gun totin' hicks.
Liberals do not want to take away your Constitutio... (
show quote)
Fifty with guns and how many did not make it out of the womb alive during the same period? Hmm...how many made it partially out of the womb alive; however, by the time they were fully delivered were no longer alive?
You actually want to take away the rights to be born.
AuntiE wrote:
Fifty with guns and how many did not make it out of the womb alive during the same period? Hmm...how many made it partially out of the womb alive; however, by the time they were fully delivered were no longer alive?
You actually want to take away the rights to be born.
Another compelling argument for universal background checks, which would have prevented these pint-sized pistoleers from obtaining guns.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.