One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Over 60% of republicans don't want Boehner, So why is he still there???
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
Jan 7, 2015 14:57:46   #
RETW Loc: Washington
 
Here are those that v**ed against Boehner:

1. Rep. Justin Amash v**ed for Jim Jordan
2. Rep. Brian Babin v**ed for present
3. Rep. Rod Blum v**ed for Daniel Webster
4. Rep. Dave Brat v**ed for Jeff Duncan
5. Rep. Jim Bridenstine v**ed for Louie Gohmert
6. Rep. Curt Clawson v**ed for Rand Paul
7. Rep. Scott DesJarlais v**ed for Jim Jordan
8. Rep. Jeff Duncan v**ed for Trey Gowdy
9. Rep. Scott Garrett v**ed for Daniel Webster
10. Rep. Chris Gibson v**ed for Kevin McCarthy
11. Rep. Louie Gohmert v**ed for Louie Gohmert
12. Rep. Paul Gosar v**ed for Daniel Webster
13. Rep. Tim Huelskamp v**ed for Daniel Webster
14. Rep. Walter Jones v**ed for Daniel Webster
15. Rep. Steve King v**ed for Daniel Webster
16. Rep. Thomas Massie v**ed for Ted Yoho
17. Rep. Mark Meadows v**ed for Daniel Webster
18. Rep. Rich Nugent v**ed for Daniel Webster
19. Rep. Gary Palmer v**ed for Jeff Sessions
20. Rep. Bill Posey v**ed for Daniel Webster
21. Rep. Scott Rigell v**ed for Daniel Webster
22. Rep. Marlin Stutzman v**ed for Daniel Webster
23. Rep. Randy Weber v**ed for Gohmert
24. Rep. Daniel Webster v**ed for Daniel Webster
25. Rep. Ted Yoho v**ed for Ted Yoho

Politico reported that “more punishment is likely to come for others that crossed Boehner.”


In his remarks shortly after the v**e, Boehner emphasized the need to reduce government spending and debt, saying future generations would have opportunities only if lawmakers worked to break free of the national debt.

"Our government has built up too much debt. Our economy is not producing enough jobs," Boehner said. "These are not separate problems.

This is yet again, Boehner talking out both sides of his face.
If he is so concerned about the debt, why then did he v**e to increase it more?
Boehner is more concerned with his power than he is with the American peoples needs. And this is despicable.

The American people v**ed overwhelmingly to end this over spending Government. And what Boehner has done, is spit right in the face of all, who with there v**e, wanted change. I suspect we will see a vast number of conservative republicans leave the party all together. I have all ready done so. I v**e independent. In keeping with this idea of dumping the republican party, might I suggest a new name for a new party.

The “American Conservative Party”
(( ACP ))

The new party would be focused on the principles of the Constitution.

And as part of its main platform, would seek to set in place term limits for all of congress, senate, and judges.
Including the Supreme Court.
Also to remove the IRS and go to a flat tax or graduated tax system.

I would think all TP members would get behind this new party, as well as
A great deal of republicans that want nothing more to do with there republican party.

Should be an interesting new year.

RETW

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 15:09:02   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
25 v**es, even for the same person is way short. Although I don't really like Boehner I'm willing to give a chance now that here has the House and Senate on his side.



RETW wrote:
Here are those that v**ed against Boehner:

1. Rep. Justin Amash v**ed for Jim Jordan
2. Rep. Brian Babin v**ed for present
3. Rep. Rod Blum v**ed for Daniel Webster
4. Rep. Dave Brat v**ed for Jeff Duncan
5. Rep. Jim Bridenstine v**ed for Louie Gohmert
6. Rep. Curt Clawson v**ed for Rand Paul
7. Rep. Scott DesJarlais v**ed for Jim Jordan
8. Rep. Jeff Duncan v**ed for Trey Gowdy
9. Rep. Scott Garrett v**ed for Daniel Webster
10. Rep. Chris Gibson v**ed for Kevin McCarthy
11. Rep. Louie Gohmert v**ed for Louie Gohmert
12. Rep. Paul Gosar v**ed for Daniel Webster
13. Rep. Tim Huelskamp v**ed for Daniel Webster
14. Rep. Walter Jones v**ed for Daniel Webster
15. Rep. Steve King v**ed for Daniel Webster
16. Rep. Thomas Massie v**ed for Ted Yoho
17. Rep. Mark Meadows v**ed for Daniel Webster
18. Rep. Rich Nugent v**ed for Daniel Webster
19. Rep. Gary Palmer v**ed for Jeff Sessions
20. Rep. Bill Posey v**ed for Daniel Webster
21. Rep. Scott Rigell v**ed for Daniel Webster
22. Rep. Marlin Stutzman v**ed for Daniel Webster
23. Rep. Randy Weber v**ed for Gohmert
24. Rep. Daniel Webster v**ed for Daniel Webster
25. Rep. Ted Yoho v**ed for Ted Yoho

Politico reported that “more punishment is likely to come for others that crossed Boehner.”


In his remarks shortly after the v**e, Boehner emphasized the need to reduce government spending and debt, saying future generations would have opportunities only if lawmakers worked to break free of the national debt.

"Our government has built up too much debt. Our economy is not producing enough jobs," Boehner said. "These are not separate problems.

This is yet again, Boehner talking out both sides of his face.
If he is so concerned about the debt, why then did he v**e to increase it more?
Boehner is more concerned with his power than he is with the American peoples needs. And this is despicable.

The American people v**ed overwhelmingly to end this over spending Government. And what Boehner has done, is spit right in the face of all, who with there v**e, wanted change. I suspect we will see a vast number of conservative republicans leave the party all together. I have all ready done so. I v**e independent. In keeping with this idea of dumping the republican party, might I suggest a new name for a new party.

The “American Conservative Party”
(( ACP ))

The new party would be focused on the principles of the Constitution.

And as part of its main platform, would seek to set in place term limits for all of congress, senate, and judges.
Including the Supreme Court.
Also to remove the IRS and go to a flat tax or graduated tax system.

I would think all TP members would get behind this new party, as well as
A great deal of republicans that want nothing more to do with there republican party.

Should be an interesting new year.

RETW
Here are those that v**ed against Boehner: br br ... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 15:36:14   #
memartin
 
RETW: Unless Boehner starts acting like a patriotic American and a Republican, I may join your new party. I'm so s**k of liars.

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2015 15:42:38   #
RETW Loc: Washington
 
memartin wrote:
RETW: Unless Boehner starts acting like a patriotic American and a Republican, I may join your new party. I'm so s**k of liars.



Me to. I'm so fed up with all this bull s**t both parties put out.

RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 15:51:23   #
RETW Loc: Washington
 
bmac32 wrote:
25 v**es, even for the same person is way short. Although I don't really like Boehner I'm willing to give a chance now that here has the House and Senate on his side.


Boehner is nothing more than a closet democrat. Spineless. This man has proven this over and over again. He sure wasn’t re-elected to the house from his state to cave to the democrats.
RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 16:14:16   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 16:14:36   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2015 16:15:18   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 16:15:19   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 16:15:19   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 16:15:19   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2015 16:15:19   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 16:15:19   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 16:15:19   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
Jan 7, 2015 16:15:19   #
battalion
 
I certainly agree with forming The American Conservative Party. It is about high time we get something done with the way we operate in Washington,D.C.. Also I would like Mr Boehner explain why he was in such a great rush to increase the U.S. debt.

Reply
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.