son of witless wrote:
If JFK came back from the dead and saw how Liberals have twisted what he said, he would shake his head in disbelief.
~~~~~~~~
Boy ya got that right.
He wanted to disband the CIA & Fed Res.
Now he'd want to disband the FBI & DOJ too!
crazylibertarian wrote:
There is an implicit inference from that statement that is not true, namely that if you're not a liberal that you don't care about the poor, health care, etc. & liberals use it regularly. Hakeem Jeffries used it in the uproar over the debt
ceiling. It's that if government doesn't provide it, it won't be provided. Nancy Pelosi used the same tactic. It's a lie.
What is never discussed by them is that wh**ever the government provides will b about three times what it should cost. It's not surprising that Rinaldi would use it also.
There is an implicit inference from that statement... (
show quote)
That really isn’t correct is it ?
That’s only another lie being broadcast against the government.
The government does not require
a 40% Profit margin.
When anything run by government is privatized its efficiency drops by 40% .
So to say government will pay more for everything is not true.
Government gives more bang per buck .
It has no white shirt brigades drawing
Excessive salaries . Or stock programs that may fluctuate up or down .
What is meant by Civil Liberties? If the government has to provide for your health, welfare, job etc. do you really have freedom to think for yourself and make your own way the world?
Milosia2 wrote:
That really isn’t correct is it ?
That’s only another lie being broadcast against the government.
The government does not require
a 40% Profit margin.
When anything run by government is privatized its efficiency drops by 40% .
So to say government will pay more for everything is not true.
Government gives more bang per buck .
It has no white shirt brigades drawing
Excessive salaries . Or stock programs that may fluctuate up or down .
The sheer stupidity of this statement is astounding.
Milosia2 wrote:
That really isn’t correct is it ?
That’s only another lie being broadcast against the government.
The government does not require
a 40% Profit margin.
When anything run by government is privatized its efficiency drops by 40% .
So to say government will pay more for everything is not true.
Government gives more bang per buck .
It has no white shirt brigades drawing
Excessive salaries . Or stock programs that may fluctuate up or down .
" When anything run by government is privatized its efficiency drops by 40% ."
Prove it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SeaLass
Loc: Western Soviet Socialist Republics
Milosia2 wrote:
That really isn’t correct is it ?
That’s only another lie being broadcast against the government.
The government does not require
a 40% Profit margin.
When anything run by government is privatized its efficiency drops by 40% .
So to say government will pay more for everything is not true.
Government gives more bang per buck .
It has no white shirt brigades drawing
Excessive salaries . Or stock programs that may fluctuate up or down .
Your forgetting to add in the 50% - 60% extra needed to cover inefficiencies and fraud. How did that $2,500/family savings with obbamycare work out for you? Can you document any examples of were something of equivalent or superior quality provided by the government at a lower cost that could be sustained (ie. not subsidized by the taxpayer)?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.