RascalRiley wrote:
Earth’s God is the most powerful entity in the entire universe?
A universe so vast we can not scientifically measure the number of planets that are trillions of light years away. In all directions.
There is a ‘God’ but are not aware enough to know.
My faith is that there is more and karma is a b***h.
The number of planets? Astronomers are still discovering entire galaxies that were not known to exist. That brings me to another point; Atheists insist that the entire shebang happened by accident. Now, accidents are covered by the laws of probability, which indicate that for this universe, which may not even be the only one, could not have just "happened." There had to be some kind of primal moving force. I am using generic terms here in an effort to be inclusive. So, where did the primal matter which originated the "Big Bang" come from? I find it ironic that the same people who make fun of the Biblical account of creation in Genesis as a fairy tale believe that 14 billion years ago, a tiny amount of hydrogen, which conveniently appeared ex nihilo somehow compressed and totally by accident, caused the Big Bang that created the entire universe. When pressed for an explanation of the source of the primal matter, some will even say it was left over from a previous universe, which once more begs the question, where did the previous universe, assuming there was one, come from?
Religion is an attempt to reduce the incomprehensible vastness of the cosmos down to a level that humans can comprehend. I believe there is a Supreme Being, and that death is not the end of our existence. I also think that lots of people have been and will continue to be mighty damn surprised when their time comes.
If God has always existed, then time and space are a sort of closed circuit, rather than a linear construct with a beginning and a one way arrow headed for infinity. In other words, what is happening and will happen has already happened. Confusing, isn't it? Funny how "settled science" becomes unsettled every few hundred years or sooner. I mean, look at where we are today, and the existence of atoms was not conclusively proven until about 1900 or thereabouts. They've been here the entire time and we just didn't know about them. Black holes were unknown in the fifties, as were quasars and quarks, and antimatter. Science has advanced more in the last 150 years than in all of recorded history, yet no one has ever been able to produce an original creative thought in a laboratory setting. There is a part of us that cannot be measured. Yet. Most people don't remember a lot of their dreams, and people who have been put under in surgery cannot remember anything about it, but can get some recall of events if they are able to be hypnotized. Your subconscious mind records everything, even though you may or may not be able to access the data.
If thought is nothing more than an electro-chemical reaction, then why can we not take a fresh corpse and introduce the proper amount of electricity to create a thought?
I am rambling, but I do believe that organized religion tends to oversimplify many questions.