Feminists Finally Starting to Support R**l W***n in Sports
Apr 25, 2023 10:11:17 #
Kellett3745 wrote:
Why aren't women who t***sition to men competing against men in sports?
🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
Indeed, why not?
Apr 25, 2023 10:41:06 #
keepuphope
Loc: Idaho
pegw wrote:
I personally think that t***s women, especially ones who are under 18, and or still produce testerone, should not be competing on women's teams. Other than that, t***s people should not be discriminated against 8n any way. Some people here do not accept that people can be very different than they are.
News flash peg...men continually produce testosterone their whole lives. So...its never fair and they have larger heart,lungs,muscle strength ect. It's never fair do you understand that.
Apr 25, 2023 11:21:21 #
Kellett3745 wrote:
Why aren't women who t***sition to men competing against men in sports?
Because they would lose. There are plenty of activities where women can compete effectively with men. Chess and pool come to mind. There are also a few athletic activities I do not believe t***swomen could beat actual women in. Women's gymnastics comes to mind.
Apr 25, 2023 11:43:08 #
son of witless wrote:
Because they would lose. There are plenty of activities where women can compete effectively with men. Chess and pool come to mind. There are also a few athletic activities I do not believe t***swomen could beat actual women in. Women's gymnastics comes to mind.
They could compete in rifle sports and curling also.
Apr 25, 2023 11:49:17 #
pegw wrote:
I personally think that t***s women, especially ones who are under 18, and or still produce testerone, should not be competing on women's teams. Other than that, t***s people should not be discriminated against 8n any way. Some people here do not accept that people can be very different than they are.
Can you not understand that allowing men to compete against women is wrong on any level? Thats not discrimination
T***s people are mentally ill. Instead of enabling that illness they should be helped.
Apr 25, 2023 12:24:29 #
Apr 25, 2023 13:52:04 #
son of witless wrote:
Because they would lose. There are plenty of activities where women can compete effectively with men. Chess and pool come to mind. There are also a few athletic activities I do not believe t***swomen could beat actual women in. Women's gymnastics comes to mind.
They certainly can’t compete effectively in the pretty and feminine category of being a woman!🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Apr 25, 2023 17:50:28 #
Justice101 wrote:
They could compete in rifle sports and curling also.
Isn't curling Canadian ice shuffle board ?
Apr 25, 2023 23:58:02 #
son of witless wrote:
Isn't curling Canadian ice shuffle board ?
It is ice shuffleboard, and it is a Winter Olympics event. Different countries participate.
Apr 26, 2023 08:17:18 #
Rose42 wrote:
Can you not understand that allowing men to compete against women is wrong on any level? Thats not discrimination
T***s people are mentally ill. Instead of enabling that illness they should be helped.
T***s people are mentally ill. Instead of enabling that illness they should be helped.
pegw can't grasp how it is wrong for men to compete against women.
Or why there has been men's and women's sports.
Apr 26, 2023 09:52:17 #
Justice101 wrote:
It is ice shuffleboard, and it is a Winter Olympics event. Different countries participate.
It is not that I do not respect those who play that sport, but from a spectator's point of view I would rather watch a chess match.
Apr 26, 2023 10:01:22 #
son of witless wrote:
It is not that I do not respect those who play that sport, but from a spectator's point of view I would rather watch a chess match.
I'd rather watch the action sports like skiing or snowboarding in the Winter Olympics. My son is an avid chess player and afficionado. Not Master level.
Apr 26, 2023 10:23:56 #
Justice101 wrote:
I'd rather watch the action sports like skiing or snowboarding in the Winter Olympics. My son is an avid chess player and afficionado. Not Master level.
In the 1980s my wife bought me a Gary Kasparov Radio Shack electronic chess set. It was great. I played a lot and got pretty good. My friends and co workers got similar electronic chess sets. We all would play each other, but eventually we all burned out. A year ago I dug out the set which sat for 25 years with the old batteries in it. they had leaked and damaged the battery holder. I was able to get it working again and started playing. I found out, I really suck now.
Before I was able to get better the old set began malfunctioning, which considering how old it was I salvaged the pieces and threw it out. I went shopping online for a new set. I thought, that after 30 plus years the new sets must be even better. Online the price range of the type of sets I wanted start at $ 49 and go up to about $ 150. I went cheap and got a Croove. It's not bad, but I liked my old Radio Shack set much better. I still suck. My son in law keeps beating me, and I cannot seem to improve no matter how much I play the computer.
My daughter put a chess program on my phone called chess club which I really like, because I can set the level much lower than one on the electronic set and My ego doesn't take a beating so bad.
Apr 26, 2023 12:20:00 #
son of witless wrote:
In the 1980s my wife bought me a Gary Kasparov Rad... (show quote)
I haven't played chess in many years, myself. My spouse and I enjoy and play the card games: bridge and pitch.Apr 26, 2023 12:42:35 #
Justice101 wrote: I haven't played chess in many years, myself. My spouse and I enjoy and play the card games: bridge and pitch.
I haven't played chess in many years, myself. My spouse and I enjoy and play the card games: bridge and pitch.PINOCHLE!!!!!!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.