T******s With Assault Weapons...Still Think Background Checks Are A Bad Idea? (Page 5): You don't need to imagine changing shoes, Blade. The images & video released to public from the...

whole2th

Blade_Runner wrote:

No, whole2th is a hard-core, Jew hating, neo-N**i ... (show quote)

You don't need to imagine changing shoes, Blade.

The images & video released to public from the school security camera and body cams show two different pairs of shoes.

And Blade doubles down on the Building 7 (911) LIES. What is Blade really about?

EmilyD

whole2th wrote:

You don't need to imagine changing shoes, Blade.

The images & video released to public from the school security camera and body cams show two different pairs of shoes.

And Blade doubles down on the Building 7 (911) LIES. What is Blade really about?

So what are you suggesting? That this was staged?

If so, logic would dictate that it is the Dems who would do this kind of thing, not Republicans.

They are the ones with a LOT to hide.

Several Biden family members were indirectly paid a lot of money...and nobody knows what "services" the Bidens gave for the money.

They need a "diversion" from that, and they think indicting Trump for something that is not a crime, and the statute of limitations has run out, is enough to cancel out their money laundering of highly questionable payments from one of our biggest enemies.

Oh...and is the shooter not dead?

Are the three kids and adults not dead??

whole2th

EmilyD wrote:

So what are you suggesting? That this was staged? ... (show quote)

EmilyD,

Your questions are logical in the context of the clear evidence of two different pairs of shoes.

I cannot answer your questions. I invite scrutiny into the discrepancy.

We know the US media and government lies about Building 7. What is so unfathomable about a false f**g control drama that fits an agenda of gun control and 'divide and conquer' prejudice involving t******s.

EmilyD

whole2th wrote:

EmilyD,

Your questions are logical in the context of the clear evidence of two different pairs of shoes.

I cannot answer your questions. I invite scrutiny into the discrepancy.

We know the US media and government lies about Building 7. What is so unfathomable about a false f**g control drama that fits an agenda of gun control and 'divide and conquer' prejudice involving t******s.

The Building 7 controversy is another issue. Yes the media skews the t***h, as does our government...now. They both used to be more "complete" in their coverage. Now it's more of a cover-up that goes on in order to keep the t***h from us.

But I guess if you think they can k**l thousands of people by staging the Building 7 controversy, they are capable of staging the k*****g children at schools to prove other points.

I suppose if they threaten enough by staging mass k*****gs, people will bow down and do their bidding. Sounds like s***ery to me. Or at the least C*******m.

Jim0001 Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA

EmilyD wrote:

So what are you suggesting? That this was staged? ... (show quote)

Also note that in the recent "mass shooting" categotry. four have been committed by t******s. Could the drug cocktails these mentally ill people are taking to try to change something that cannot be changed (X is X and Y is Y) possibly be causing even more d*****t behavior. Joebama and the democrats are the ones pushing perversion as a normal behavior.

SeaLass Loc: Western Soviet Socialist Republics

woodguru wrote:

Word is on our christian shooting t****y, she was unstable to a degree she never should have been able to legally buy guns...her parents knew it.

Yet he/she LEGALLY got through 7 background checks and bought 7 guns without anyone being the wiser. He/she also left a detailed manifesto, and told people what was being planned. Still think background checks work?

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

whole2th wrote:

You don't need to imagine changing shoes, Blade.

The images & video released to public from the school security camera and body cams show two different pairs of shoes.

And Blade doubles down on the Building 7 (911) LIES. What is Blade really about?

If all those photos had been taken with one camera, at one aperture setting or one FPS resolution, with the same lens and in the same lighting conditions, and there were actually two pairs of shoes, we might have something to talk about.

Police body cams, security cameras, smart phone apps, SLR, wide angle lenses, polarizing filters, wh**ever,
take a picture of the same thing, under the same lighting conditions, with a dozen different cameras and you're gonna get a dozen different results.

If WTC7 had actually been brought down by controlled demolition, we might have something to talk about.

If it had been Jews that attacked us on 9/11 rather than Muslim terrorists, we might have something to talk about.

What is Blade really about?

I drill into the T***h, not into a tooth.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

EmilyD wrote:

The Building 7 controversy is another issue.

In t***h, Emily, there is no controversy about WTC7, the building collapsed due to severe damage and fire.
Only the tin foil hatters and their cockamamie theories are controversial.

EmilyD

Blade_Runner wrote:

In t***h, Emily, there is no controversy about WTC7, the building collapsed due to severe damage and fire.
Only the tin foil hatters and their cockamamie theories are controversial.

No, I don't think it's a controversy in the least. I have no doubts wh**ever about 9/11 - it was an attack by Muslim terrorists on our country by using four planes to blow up the twin towers in New York, the Pentagon in DC and by crashing the other one into the ground in Pennsylvania. The buildings that were damaged as a result were collateral damage from the attack.

I called it a "controversy" because others are making it that by not believing the obvious facts.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Fab wrote:

That’s stereotyping, you’re saying all t*********rs are mental. Sick!

I am. You are correct! If you don't know you're a boy or a girl, something be wrong with you!

whole2th

Blade_Runner wrote:

In t***h, Emily, there is no controversy about WTC7, the building collapsed due to severe damage and fire.
Only the tin foil hatters and their cockamamie theories are controversial.

Blade: "In t***h, Emily..."

Why would Blade want to keeping doubling down on this obvious lie?

The 911 Commission Report does not mention WTC7 in over 500 pages of the report.

The BBC announced WTC7 had collapsed, 23 minutes BEFORE IT COLLAPSED. https://youtu.be/9GcjP9KVR7E Search in JewTube makes this video hard to locate.

https://www.b***hute.com/video/zqiDlGPT1ZB2/

NIST admitted to not testing the WTC7 debris for explosives. https://youtu.be/n-XboRtBhAg

https://www.facebook.com/wtc7evaluation/posts/d41d8cd9/2670699839919419/

That Building 7 was an obvious controlled demolition undermines the entire official story about 9-11. Muslims could not have prepared WTC7 for demolition. It wasn't hit by a plane. The University of Alaska--Fairbanks study with computer modeling went well beyond the government NIST evaluation to prove that what is observed could not have been the result of fire weakening the structure.

Does Blade get his jollies from spewing lies and receiving criticism for his lies?

Justice101

whole2th wrote:

Blade: "In t***h, Emily..." br br Why ... (show quote)

Here is a link to add to your archives. It is a timeline regarding the World Trade towers. When you get down to the 9/11/2001 you will find the mentioning about the thermite from a bomb as the aluminum is pouring out a yellow color, while molten aluminum is silver.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210128120920/http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?investigations:_a_detailed_look=wtcinvestigation&timeline=complete_911_timeline

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Justice101 wrote:

Some of the t***swomen do actually look like r**l w***n. I usually thought of them as caricatures of women or women impersonators. Ignorance is bliss.

https://www.cnn.com/style/article/miss-international-queen-2022-winner-philippines/index.html

They have a saying in Thailand. 'Never go out with a tall Thai woman. There aren't any"

Justice101

LogicallyRight wrote:

They have a saying in Thailand. 'Never go out with a tall Thai woman. There aren't any"

I'm not interested. Happily married for over 40 years. God-given Original equipment on both of us.

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

Justice101 wrote:

I'm not interested. Happily married for over 40 years. God-given Original equipment on both of us.