One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Put the false stories down
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Mar 18, 2023 00:22:12   #
BIRDMAN
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
The Philippines went to the international court if law... UN... But China doesn't recognize the ruling...

Personally, I think building those islands was brilliant...


Unsinkable aircraft carrier

Reply
Mar 18, 2023 00:24:55   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Birdmam wrote:
Unsinkable aircraft carrier


And because they are man-made they absolutely belong to China...

Reply
Mar 18, 2023 02:24:48   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
permafrost wrote:
MMMM, yes, I think it would be good to see the issue brought up to the UN... but would like to understand jurisdiction on the issue.. at least on paper.. How about the world court.. In netherland????


Would be a waste China holds a permanent position in UN security which has primarily maintained international peace and security under UN charter 8 THIS IS A JOKE since China is threatening war and is. I don't see any UN peace and security working here, do you????

Reply
 
 
Mar 18, 2023 02:39:59   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
bggamers wrote:
Would be a waste China holds a permanent position in UN security which has primarily maintained international peace and security under UN charter 8 THIS IS A JOKE since China is threatening war and is. I don't see any UN peace and security working here, do you????


The US, Russia, the UK, and France all hold seats on the permanent council...
The difference is that China hasn't started any wars...

Reply
Mar 18, 2023 11:07:55   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
The Philippines went to the international court if law... UN... But China doesn't recognize the ruling...

Personally, I think building those islands was brilliant...


Heck of an accomplishment, like it or not...

Reply
Mar 18, 2023 14:00:54   #
LostAggie66 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
 
RascalRiley wrote:
You are missing a take on reality. It is necessity to separate the factual reporting from the opinion.

Most, all actually, are from a left wing’s perspective. Half the country.

It is wise to know the enemy.

Some fact you would not know about if you do not at least read the RawStory burbs.

PS. Most will piss you off just as much as most of The Federalist blurbs rankle me.


That makes sense RR so I will give RAw Story a second look from now on.

Reply
Mar 18, 2023 14:18:42   #
Justice101
 
RascalRiley wrote:
You are missing a take on reality. It is necessity to separate the factual reporting from the opinion.

Most, all actually, are from a left wing’s perspective. Half the country.

It is wise to know the enemy.

Some fact you would not know about if you do not at least read the RawStory burbs.

PS. Most will piss you off just as much as most of The Federalist blurbs rankle me.


Where's the factual reporting of Raw Story Rascal? If you have to separate the "wheat from the chaff" to find any t***h in their reporting, then why bother? There are other more CREDITABLE SOURCES to find factual articles that may or may not be slanted toward one side, but they are at least not tabloid-style opinion click-bait journalism.

Reply
 
 
Mar 18, 2023 14:21:30   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Justice101 wrote:
Where's the factual reporting of Raw Story Rascal? If you have to separate the "wheat from the chaff" to find any t***h in their reporting, then why bother? There are other more CREDITABLE SOURCES to find factual articles that may or may not be slanted toward one side, but they are at least not tabloid-style opinion click-bait journalism.

There are other more CREDITABLE SOURCES

What do you consider credible sources?

Reply
Mar 18, 2023 17:34:54   #
Justice101
 
RascalRiley wrote:
There are other more CREDITABLE SOURCES

What do you consider credible sources?


Well, as you know unbiased news doesn't exist. The key is to read multiple publications from the other side of the fence that are reporting on the same subject that you are questioning and compare them to the sources that you have confidence in for reporting facts as well as opinions.

A few examples of news sources that I find credible are: BBC, C-SPAN, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, ProPublica, Wall Street Journal, [Reuters & AP (for comparisons)], Axios, Newsweek, Politico and USA Today has some good journalists, and the Economist. FAIR writes about media bias and shines a light on the left as well as those on the right. Some others I read are: Real Clear Politics, Newsweek, Forbes, The Hill, Market Watch, Reason, Epoch News, New York Post News, Washington Examiner to name a few.

Here is a good site from Allsides.com which shows you where different sites land on the bias chart and you can take it from there.
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
There are many others that I may peruse, depending on what the subject is, and which news sites are reporting on it. You wouldn't find many left-leaning sites that report on detrimental news regarding the Biden admin. would you?

Reply
Mar 18, 2023 17:59:10   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Justice101 wrote:
Well, as you know unbiased news doesn't exist. The key is to read multiple publications from the other side of the fence that are reporting on the same subject that you are questioning and compare them to the sources that you have confidence in for reporting facts as well as opinions.

A few examples of news sources that I find credible are: BBC, C-SPAN, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, ProPublica, Wall Street Journal, [Reuters & AP (for comparisons)], Axios, Newsweek, Politico and USA Today has some good journalists, and the Economist. FAIR writes about media bias and shines a light on the left as well as those on the right. Some others I read are: Real Clear Politics, Newsweek, Forbes, The Hill, Market Watch, Reason, Epoch News, New York Post News, Washington Examiner to name a few.

Here is a good site from Allsides.com which shows you where different sites land on the bias chart and you can take it from there.
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
There are many others that I may peruse, depending on what the subject is, and which news sites are reporting on it. You wouldn't find many left-leaning sites that report on detrimental news regarding the Biden admin. would you?
Well, as you know unbiased news doesn't exist. The... (show quote)

Good list. I read many of them myself.

Reply
Mar 18, 2023 18:03:17   #
Justice101
 
RascalRiley wrote:

Good list. I read many of them myself.


Then why don't you use some of them other than the junk journalism (Raw Story) that you usually site?

Reply
 
 
Mar 18, 2023 18:30:15   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Justice101 wrote:
Then why don't you use some of them other than the junk journalism (Raw Story) that you usually site?


I was just reading articles on RedState. There are many on OPP that post the far right articles and few who post far left.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/03/18/jonathan-turley-destroys-the-d-a-s-case-against-trump-its-all-about-theatrics-n718332

This is an interesting article but it’s message is well covered by those on OPP right of centre.

The Stormy case is small potatoes.

Reply
Mar 18, 2023 18:36:07   #
Justice101
 
RascalRiley wrote:
I was just reading articles on RedState. There are many on OPP that post the far right articles and few who post far left.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/03/18/jonathan-turley-destroys-the-d-a-s-case-against-trump-its-all-about-theatrics-n718332

This is an interesting article but it’s message is well covered by those on OPP right of centre.

The Stormy case is small potatoes.


I use right and left-leaning sources (sometimes in the same post) to get my point across or defend my statements.
Good article from RedState It uses a reliable source (Jonathan Turley) to get their point across.

Reply
Mar 19, 2023 01:15:28   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
permafrost wrote:
There is no known deal where the Bidens are concerned. No deals at all. None of the Bidens got 3 million from China

Now we know China invested in a Trump project when they ran out of money, millions and millions . Trump admitted owing the Chinese government owned bank of China over 500 million dollars.

We know H****r B***n served a 5 year term on the board of a Cypr**t company that did oil and gas exploration in the Ukraine and got paid slightly under the going rate for a corporate board member. The service that was provided was sitting on a corporate board and making decisions for the company. H****r B***n was also tapped because he had a record of being a successful venture capitalist, raising money for companies.

Biden has no ties to Russia or China and the only ties to the Ukraine is encouraging Americans to support the Ukrainians in defending themselves. Biden unlike Trump has stood up to both Russia and China as well as North Korea. He isn’t going to grovel to North Korea, or Russia or China as Trump did.
There is no known deal where the Bidens are concer... (show quote)

Ahahahaha, now I know why you guys loved the Russian Collusion Delusion so much, You all live in delusions!!!!

Reply
Mar 19, 2023 11:48:12   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
microphor wrote:
Ahahahaha, now I know why you guys loved the Russian Collusion Delusion so much, You all live in delusions!!!!


Gee, micro, you have to do better than that...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.